In Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates to Ceftriaxone Alone and Ceftriaxone in Combination With Sulbactam or Tazobactam: A Comparative Study of Broad-Spectrum β-Lactam Antibiotics in India

Background This study was designed to evaluate the current in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates to broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Methodology Bacterial isolates, cultured from 180 non-repetitive clinical samples between April and November 2022 at three hospitals in India, were used to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics using the Epsilometer test (E-test) method. Test antibiotics were ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) sulbactam and tazobactam. Comparator antibiotics included amoxicillin + BLI clavulanic acid, piperacillin + tazobactam, cefotaxime, and cefepime. The MIC values obtained were used to assess the susceptibility of the isolates and to compute the efficacy ratios (ERs) of the antibiotics. Results Among the 180 clinical isolates, ~89% were gram-negative bacteria, the most prevalent ones being Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of the gram-negative isolates, ~37% were susceptible/intermediately susceptible to ceftriaxone, and ~29% were susceptible to ceftriaxone + BLIs. The test antibiotics had ER >10 against 85%-95% E. coli isolates, whereas comparator antibiotics had ER >10 against 31%-68% isolates. The differences between the test antibiotics and piperacillin + tazobactam or cefotaxime were statistically significant. Ceftriaxone, ceftriaxone + sulbactam, and ceftriaxone + tazobactam had ER >10 against 78%, 100%, and 90% of K. pneumoniae isolates, while the corresponding percentages for cefotaxime, piperacillin + tazobactam, and cefepime were 100%, 64%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between ceftriaxone + BLIs and piperacillin + tazobactam was statistically significant. Ceftriaxone + BLIs had ER >10 against all E. coli isolates producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); the percentage of isolates was significantly higher than that for piperacillin + tazobactam. Ceftriaxone + tazobactam had ER >10 against all ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates; ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone + sulbactam had ER ranging 6-10. Conclusions Ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone in combination with sulbactam and tazobactam are promising antibiotics to explore against prevalent infectious microorganisms such as E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Ceftriaxone + tazobactam also holds promise against ESBL-producing variants.