Cargando…

Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments

During perceptual decision-making tasks, centroparietal electroencephalographic (EEG) potentials report an evidence accumulation-to-bound process that is time locked to trial onset. However, decisions in real-world environments are rarely confined to discrete trials; they instead unfold continuously...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruesseler, Maria, Weber, Lilian Aline, Marshall, Tom Rhys, O'Reilly, Jill, Hunt, Laurence Tudor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883173
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82823
_version_ 1785126414916255744
author Ruesseler, Maria
Weber, Lilian Aline
Marshall, Tom Rhys
O'Reilly, Jill
Hunt, Laurence Tudor
author_facet Ruesseler, Maria
Weber, Lilian Aline
Marshall, Tom Rhys
O'Reilly, Jill
Hunt, Laurence Tudor
author_sort Ruesseler, Maria
collection PubMed
description During perceptual decision-making tasks, centroparietal electroencephalographic (EEG) potentials report an evidence accumulation-to-bound process that is time locked to trial onset. However, decisions in real-world environments are rarely confined to discrete trials; they instead unfold continuously, with accumulation of time-varying evidence being recency-weighted towards its immediate past. The neural mechanisms supporting recency-weighted continuous decision-making remain unclear. Here, we use a novel continuous task design to study how the centroparietal positivity (CPP) adapts to different environments that place different constraints on evidence accumulation. We show that adaptations in evidence weighting to these different environments are reflected in changes in the CPP. The CPP becomes more sensitive to fluctuations in sensory evidence when large shifts in evidence are less frequent, and the potential is primarily sensitive to fluctuations in decision-relevant (not decision-irrelevant) sensory input. A complementary triphasic component over occipito-parietal cortex encodes the sum of recently accumulated sensory evidence, and its magnitude covaries with parameters describing how different individuals integrate sensory evidence over time. A computational model based on leaky evidence accumulation suggests that these findings can be accounted for by a shift in decision threshold between different environments, which is also reflected in the magnitude of pre-decision EEG activity. Our findings reveal how adaptations in EEG responses reflect flexibility in evidence accumulation to the statistics of dynamic sensory environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106025892023-10-27 Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments Ruesseler, Maria Weber, Lilian Aline Marshall, Tom Rhys O'Reilly, Jill Hunt, Laurence Tudor eLife Neuroscience During perceptual decision-making tasks, centroparietal electroencephalographic (EEG) potentials report an evidence accumulation-to-bound process that is time locked to trial onset. However, decisions in real-world environments are rarely confined to discrete trials; they instead unfold continuously, with accumulation of time-varying evidence being recency-weighted towards its immediate past. The neural mechanisms supporting recency-weighted continuous decision-making remain unclear. Here, we use a novel continuous task design to study how the centroparietal positivity (CPP) adapts to different environments that place different constraints on evidence accumulation. We show that adaptations in evidence weighting to these different environments are reflected in changes in the CPP. The CPP becomes more sensitive to fluctuations in sensory evidence when large shifts in evidence are less frequent, and the potential is primarily sensitive to fluctuations in decision-relevant (not decision-irrelevant) sensory input. A complementary triphasic component over occipito-parietal cortex encodes the sum of recently accumulated sensory evidence, and its magnitude covaries with parameters describing how different individuals integrate sensory evidence over time. A computational model based on leaky evidence accumulation suggests that these findings can be accounted for by a shift in decision threshold between different environments, which is also reflected in the magnitude of pre-decision EEG activity. Our findings reveal how adaptations in EEG responses reflect flexibility in evidence accumulation to the statistics of dynamic sensory environments. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10602589/ /pubmed/37883173 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82823 Text en © 2023, Ruesseler, Weber et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ruesseler, Maria
Weber, Lilian Aline
Marshall, Tom Rhys
O'Reilly, Jill
Hunt, Laurence Tudor
Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
title Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
title_full Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
title_fullStr Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
title_short Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
title_sort quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883173
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82823
work_keys_str_mv AT ruesselermaria quantifyingdecisionmakingindynamiccontinuouslyevolvingenvironments
AT weberlilianaline quantifyingdecisionmakingindynamiccontinuouslyevolvingenvironments
AT marshalltomrhys quantifyingdecisionmakingindynamiccontinuouslyevolvingenvironments
AT oreillyjill quantifyingdecisionmakingindynamiccontinuouslyevolvingenvironments
AT huntlaurencetudor quantifyingdecisionmakingindynamiccontinuouslyevolvingenvironments