Cargando…

Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies

Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R, Johnson, Walter G, Tournas, Lucille Nalbach, Rozell, Christopher J, Rommelfanger, Karen S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025
_version_ 1785126430054547456
author O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R
Johnson, Walter G
Tournas, Lucille Nalbach
Rozell, Christopher J
Rommelfanger, Karen S
author_facet O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R
Johnson, Walter G
Tournas, Lucille Nalbach
Rozell, Christopher J
Rommelfanger, Karen S
author_sort O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R
collection PubMed
description Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106026602023-10-27 Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R Johnson, Walter G Tournas, Lucille Nalbach Rozell, Christopher J Rommelfanger, Karen S J Law Biosci Original Article Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings. Oxford University Press 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10602660/ /pubmed/37901886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R
Johnson, Walter G
Tournas, Lucille Nalbach
Rozell, Christopher J
Rommelfanger, Karen S
Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
title Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
title_full Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
title_fullStr Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
title_full_unstemmed Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
title_short Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
title_sort neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025
work_keys_str_mv AT oshaughnessymatthewr neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies
AT johnsonwalterg neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies
AT tournaslucillenalbach neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies
AT rozellchristopherj neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies
AT rommelfangerkarens neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies