Cargando…
Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies
Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025 |
_version_ | 1785126430054547456 |
---|---|
author | O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R Johnson, Walter G Tournas, Lucille Nalbach Rozell, Christopher J Rommelfanger, Karen S |
author_facet | O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R Johnson, Walter G Tournas, Lucille Nalbach Rozell, Christopher J Rommelfanger, Karen S |
author_sort | O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10602660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106026602023-10-27 Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R Johnson, Walter G Tournas, Lucille Nalbach Rozell, Christopher J Rommelfanger, Karen S J Law Biosci Original Article Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings. Oxford University Press 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10602660/ /pubmed/37901886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article O’Shaughnessy, Matthew R Johnson, Walter G Tournas, Lucille Nalbach Rozell, Christopher J Rommelfanger, Karen S Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
title | Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
title_full | Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
title_fullStr | Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
title_short | Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
title_sort | neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oshaughnessymatthewr neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies AT johnsonwalterg neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies AT tournaslucillenalbach neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies AT rozellchristopherj neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies AT rommelfangerkarens neuroethicsguidancedocumentsprinciplesanalysisandimplementationstrategies |