Cargando…

Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population

Introduction: Genomics has the potential to transform medicine by identifying genetic risk factors that predispose people to certain illnesses. Use of genetic screening is rapidly expanding and shifting towards screening all patients regardless of known risk factors, but research is limited on the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickey, Lindsay, Gronowski, Ben, Jones, Kyle, Rinaldi, J. B., Emery, Kate, Clemens, Jon, Gordon, Ora, Vartanian, Keri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1272931
_version_ 1785126455915577344
author Dickey, Lindsay
Gronowski, Ben
Jones, Kyle
Rinaldi, J. B.
Emery, Kate
Clemens, Jon
Gordon, Ora
Vartanian, Keri
author_facet Dickey, Lindsay
Gronowski, Ben
Jones, Kyle
Rinaldi, J. B.
Emery, Kate
Clemens, Jon
Gordon, Ora
Vartanian, Keri
author_sort Dickey, Lindsay
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Genomics has the potential to transform medicine by identifying genetic risk factors that predispose people to certain illnesses. Use of genetic screening is rapidly expanding and shifting towards screening all patients regardless of known risk factors, but research is limited on the success of broad population-level outreach for genetic testing and the effectiveness of different outreach methods across diverse populations. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of Digital Only (emailing and texting) and Brochure Plus Digital (mailed brochure, emailing, and texting) outreach to encourage a diverse patient population to participate in a large hospital system’s whole genome sequencing program. Methods: Disproportionate stratified sampling was used to create a study population more demographically diverse than the eligible population and response rates were analyzed overall and by demographics to understand the effectiveness of different outreach strategies. Results: 7.5% of all eligible patients enrolled in the program. While approximately 70% of patients invited to complete genetic testing identified in their EHR as being Hispanic, Black or African America, Asian, or another non-White race, these patients generally enrolled at lower rates than the overall population. Other underrepresented groups had higher enrollment rates including people with Medicaid coverage (8.7%) and those residing in rural areas (10.6%). We found no significant difference in enrollment rates between our Digital-Only and our Brochure Plus Digital outreach approaches in the overall population, but enrollment rates were significantly higher for Asian patients and patients who resided in rural areas in the Brochure Plus Digital group. Across both outreach approaches, links provided in emails were most commonly used for enrollment. Discussion: Our study reveals expected enrollment rates for proactive outreach by a hospital system for genetic testing in a diverse population. As more hospital systems are adopting population-scale genetic testing, these findings can inform future outreach efforts to recruit patients for genetic testing including those patients traditionally underrepresented in genomics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106027752023-10-28 Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population Dickey, Lindsay Gronowski, Ben Jones, Kyle Rinaldi, J. B. Emery, Kate Clemens, Jon Gordon, Ora Vartanian, Keri Front Genet Genetics Introduction: Genomics has the potential to transform medicine by identifying genetic risk factors that predispose people to certain illnesses. Use of genetic screening is rapidly expanding and shifting towards screening all patients regardless of known risk factors, but research is limited on the success of broad population-level outreach for genetic testing and the effectiveness of different outreach methods across diverse populations. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of Digital Only (emailing and texting) and Brochure Plus Digital (mailed brochure, emailing, and texting) outreach to encourage a diverse patient population to participate in a large hospital system’s whole genome sequencing program. Methods: Disproportionate stratified sampling was used to create a study population more demographically diverse than the eligible population and response rates were analyzed overall and by demographics to understand the effectiveness of different outreach strategies. Results: 7.5% of all eligible patients enrolled in the program. While approximately 70% of patients invited to complete genetic testing identified in their EHR as being Hispanic, Black or African America, Asian, or another non-White race, these patients generally enrolled at lower rates than the overall population. Other underrepresented groups had higher enrollment rates including people with Medicaid coverage (8.7%) and those residing in rural areas (10.6%). We found no significant difference in enrollment rates between our Digital-Only and our Brochure Plus Digital outreach approaches in the overall population, but enrollment rates were significantly higher for Asian patients and patients who resided in rural areas in the Brochure Plus Digital group. Across both outreach approaches, links provided in emails were most commonly used for enrollment. Discussion: Our study reveals expected enrollment rates for proactive outreach by a hospital system for genetic testing in a diverse population. As more hospital systems are adopting population-scale genetic testing, these findings can inform future outreach efforts to recruit patients for genetic testing including those patients traditionally underrepresented in genomics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10602775/ /pubmed/37900185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1272931 Text en Copyright © 2023 Dickey, Gronowski, Jones, Rinaldi, Emery, Clemens, Gordon and Vartanian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Dickey, Lindsay
Gronowski, Ben
Jones, Kyle
Rinaldi, J. B.
Emery, Kate
Clemens, Jon
Gordon, Ora
Vartanian, Keri
Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
title Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
title_full Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
title_fullStr Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
title_full_unstemmed Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
title_short Participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
title_sort participation in genetic screening: testing different outreach methods across a diverse hospital system based patient population
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1272931
work_keys_str_mv AT dickeylindsay participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT gronowskiben participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT joneskyle participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT rinaldijb participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT emerykate participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT clemensjon participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT gordonora participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation
AT vartaniankeri participationingeneticscreeningtestingdifferentoutreachmethodsacrossadiversehospitalsystembasedpatientpopulation