Cargando…
Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
PURPOSE: Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced es...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4 |
_version_ | 1785126497379418112 |
---|---|
author | Stelmach, Ramona Apostolidis, Leonidas Kahle, Steffen Sisic, Leila Nienhüser, Henrik Weber, Tim Frederik Jäger, Dirk Haag, Georg Martin |
author_facet | Stelmach, Ramona Apostolidis, Leonidas Kahle, Steffen Sisic, Leila Nienhüser, Henrik Weber, Tim Frederik Jäger, Dirk Haag, Georg Martin |
author_sort | Stelmach, Ramona |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3–4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10602954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106029542023-10-28 Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up Stelmach, Ramona Apostolidis, Leonidas Kahle, Steffen Sisic, Leila Nienhüser, Henrik Weber, Tim Frederik Jäger, Dirk Haag, Georg Martin J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3–4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10602954/ /pubmed/37589924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Stelmach, Ramona Apostolidis, Leonidas Kahle, Steffen Sisic, Leila Nienhüser, Henrik Weber, Tim Frederik Jäger, Dirk Haag, Georg Martin Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
title | Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
title_full | Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
title_fullStr | Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
title_short | Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
title_sort | pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stelmachramona patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT apostolidisleonidas patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT kahlesteffen patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT sisicleila patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT nienhuserhenrik patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT webertimfrederik patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT jagerdirk patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup AT haaggeorgmartin patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup |