Cargando…

Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up

PURPOSE: Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelmach, Ramona, Apostolidis, Leonidas, Kahle, Steffen, Sisic, Leila, Nienhüser, Henrik, Weber, Tim Frederik, Jäger, Dirk, Haag, Georg Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4
_version_ 1785126497379418112
author Stelmach, Ramona
Apostolidis, Leonidas
Kahle, Steffen
Sisic, Leila
Nienhüser, Henrik
Weber, Tim Frederik
Jäger, Dirk
Haag, Georg Martin
author_facet Stelmach, Ramona
Apostolidis, Leonidas
Kahle, Steffen
Sisic, Leila
Nienhüser, Henrik
Weber, Tim Frederik
Jäger, Dirk
Haag, Georg Martin
author_sort Stelmach, Ramona
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3–4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106029542023-10-28 Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up Stelmach, Ramona Apostolidis, Leonidas Kahle, Steffen Sisic, Leila Nienhüser, Henrik Weber, Tim Frederik Jäger, Dirk Haag, Georg Martin J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3–4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10602954/ /pubmed/37589924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Stelmach, Ramona
Apostolidis, Leonidas
Kahle, Steffen
Sisic, Leila
Nienhüser, Henrik
Weber, Tim Frederik
Jäger, Dirk
Haag, Georg Martin
Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
title Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
title_full Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
title_fullStr Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
title_short Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
title_sort pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4
work_keys_str_mv AT stelmachramona patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT apostolidisleonidas patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT kahlesteffen patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT sisicleila patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT nienhuserhenrik patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT webertimfrederik patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT jagerdirk patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup
AT haaggeorgmartin patternandtimepointofrelapseinlocallyadvancedesophagogastricadenocarcinomaaftermultimodaltreatmentimplicationsforausefulstructuredfollowup