Coping with Administrative Workload: a Pilot Study in the Usefulness of a Workshop for Psychiatric Trainees

OBJECTIVE: Administrative workload may have detrimental effects on medical postgraduate trainee satisfaction, capacity, and quality of care. Best-practice guidelines to help trainees cope have yet to be developed. This study explores perceptions of factors that influence the experience or amount of administrative workload at the personal and workplace level and evaluates the usefulness of a workshop on coping with this workload. METHODS: A workshop was developed based on the Job Demands-Resources model, including a survey on perceptions of administrative workload; presentation on coping at personal (e.g., time management) and workplace (e.g., dealing with institutional rules) levels; personal plan of change during a group discussion; and reflective questionnaire after the session and again after 2 months. Perceptions of psychiatry trainee participants (N = 48) were collected. RESULTS: Trainees estimated they spent half their time on administration (average 50%, SD = 15%). They wanted to spend less time (average 23%, SD = 11%) on most administrative duties, except for health record keeping. Personal factors that trainees experienced as helpful to cope included time management and analytical skills. Perfectionism was perceived as impeding. Supportive job factors included helpful supervisors, competent administrative staff, trust in a team, allocated timeslots, and information technology support. High workload and cumbersome procedures were mentioned as impeding. On average, trainees rated the workshop quality and the likelihood of bringing change to their practice with a 7 out of 10. CONCLUSION: Psychiatry trainees’ participation in a workshop on coping with administrative load during their training may be a worthwhile investment in the long term.