Cargando…
I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel
The supraglottic airway (SGA) is widely used. I-gel Plus is a next-generation i-gel with some improvements, including facilitation of fiberoptic tracheal intubation (FOI). To compare the performance of i-gel Plus and standard i-gel as conduits for FOI, a Thiel-embalmed cadaveric study was conducted....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37884591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45631-0 |
_version_ | 1785126523521466368 |
---|---|
author | Chaki, Tomohiro Tachibana, Shunsuke Kumita, Sho Sato, Satoshi Hirahata, Tomoki Ikeshima, Yuta Ohsaki, Yuki Yamakage, Michiaki |
author_facet | Chaki, Tomohiro Tachibana, Shunsuke Kumita, Sho Sato, Satoshi Hirahata, Tomoki Ikeshima, Yuta Ohsaki, Yuki Yamakage, Michiaki |
author_sort | Chaki, Tomohiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The supraglottic airway (SGA) is widely used. I-gel Plus is a next-generation i-gel with some improvements, including facilitation of fiberoptic tracheal intubation (FOI). To compare the performance of i-gel Plus and standard i-gel as conduits for FOI, a Thiel-embalmed cadaveric study was conducted. Twenty-two anesthesiologists were enrolled as operators in Experiment 1. The i-gel Plus and standard i-gel were inserted into one cadaver, and the FOI was performed through each SGA. The primary outcome was time required for FOI. The secondary outcomes were the number of attempts and visual analog scale (VAS) score for difficulty in FOI. Moreover, fiberoptic views of the vocal cords in each SGA were assessed by an attending anesthesiologist using nine cadavers in Experiment 2. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score without fiberscope tip upward flexion and upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The time for FOI through i-gel Plus was significantly shorter than that through standard i-gel (median (IQR), i-gel Plus: 30.3 (25.4–39.0) s, vs standard i-gel: 54.7 (29.6–135.0) s; median of differences, 24.4 s; adjusted 95% confidence interval, 3.0–105.7; adjusted P = 0.040). Although the number of attempts for successful FOI was not significantly different, the VAS score for difficulty in the i-gel Plus group was significantly lower (easier) than that in the standard i-gel group. Moreover, i-gel Plus required a significantly smaller upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score. FOI can be performed more easily using i-gel Plus than using standard i-gel because of the improved fiberoptic visibility of vocal cords. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10603072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106030722023-10-28 I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel Chaki, Tomohiro Tachibana, Shunsuke Kumita, Sho Sato, Satoshi Hirahata, Tomoki Ikeshima, Yuta Ohsaki, Yuki Yamakage, Michiaki Sci Rep Article The supraglottic airway (SGA) is widely used. I-gel Plus is a next-generation i-gel with some improvements, including facilitation of fiberoptic tracheal intubation (FOI). To compare the performance of i-gel Plus and standard i-gel as conduits for FOI, a Thiel-embalmed cadaveric study was conducted. Twenty-two anesthesiologists were enrolled as operators in Experiment 1. The i-gel Plus and standard i-gel were inserted into one cadaver, and the FOI was performed through each SGA. The primary outcome was time required for FOI. The secondary outcomes were the number of attempts and visual analog scale (VAS) score for difficulty in FOI. Moreover, fiberoptic views of the vocal cords in each SGA were assessed by an attending anesthesiologist using nine cadavers in Experiment 2. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score without fiberscope tip upward flexion and upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The time for FOI through i-gel Plus was significantly shorter than that through standard i-gel (median (IQR), i-gel Plus: 30.3 (25.4–39.0) s, vs standard i-gel: 54.7 (29.6–135.0) s; median of differences, 24.4 s; adjusted 95% confidence interval, 3.0–105.7; adjusted P = 0.040). Although the number of attempts for successful FOI was not significantly different, the VAS score for difficulty in the i-gel Plus group was significantly lower (easier) than that in the standard i-gel group. Moreover, i-gel Plus required a significantly smaller upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score. FOI can be performed more easily using i-gel Plus than using standard i-gel because of the improved fiberoptic visibility of vocal cords. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10603072/ /pubmed/37884591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45631-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Chaki, Tomohiro Tachibana, Shunsuke Kumita, Sho Sato, Satoshi Hirahata, Tomoki Ikeshima, Yuta Ohsaki, Yuki Yamakage, Michiaki I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
title | I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
title_full | I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
title_fullStr | I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
title_full_unstemmed | I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
title_short | I-gel Plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
title_sort | i-gel plus acts as a superior conduit for fiberoptic intubation than standard i-gel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37884591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45631-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chakitomohiro igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT tachibanashunsuke igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT kumitasho igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT satosatoshi igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT hirahatatomoki igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT ikeshimayuta igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT ohsakiyuki igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel AT yamakagemichiaki igelplusactsasasuperiorconduitforfiberopticintubationthanstandardigel |