Cargando…

Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity

Machine learning approaches have been fruitfully applied to several neurophysiological signal classification problems. Considering the relevance of emotion in human cognition and behaviour, an important application of machine learning has been found in the field of emotion identification based on ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilucaglia, Marco, Duma, Gian Marco, Mento, Giovanni, Semenzato, Luca, Tressoldi, Patrizio E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899775
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22202.3
_version_ 1785126580107870208
author Bilucaglia, Marco
Duma, Gian Marco
Mento, Giovanni
Semenzato, Luca
Tressoldi, Patrizio E.
author_facet Bilucaglia, Marco
Duma, Gian Marco
Mento, Giovanni
Semenzato, Luca
Tressoldi, Patrizio E.
author_sort Bilucaglia, Marco
collection PubMed
description Machine learning approaches have been fruitfully applied to several neurophysiological signal classification problems. Considering the relevance of emotion in human cognition and behaviour, an important application of machine learning has been found in the field of emotion identification based on neurophysiological activity. Nonetheless, there is high variability in results in the literature depending on the neuronal activity measurement, the signal features and the classifier type. The present work aims to provide new methodological insight into machine learning applied to emotion identification based on electrophysiological brain activity. For this reason, we analysed previously recorded EEG activity measured while emotional stimuli, high and low arousal (auditory and visual) were provided to a group of healthy participants. Our target signal to classify was the pre-stimulus onset brain activity. Classification performance of three different classifiers (LDA, SVM and kNN) was compared using both spectral and temporal features. Furthermore, we also contrasted the performance of static and dynamic (time evolving) approaches. The best static feature-classifier combination was the SVM with spectral features (51.8%), followed by LDA with spectral features (51.4%) and kNN with temporal features (51%). The best dynamic feature classifier combination was the SVM with temporal features (63.8%), followed by kNN with temporal features (63.70%) and LDA with temporal features (63.68%). The results show a clear increase in classification accuracy with temporal dynamic features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106033162023-10-28 Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity Bilucaglia, Marco Duma, Gian Marco Mento, Giovanni Semenzato, Luca Tressoldi, Patrizio E. F1000Res Method Article Machine learning approaches have been fruitfully applied to several neurophysiological signal classification problems. Considering the relevance of emotion in human cognition and behaviour, an important application of machine learning has been found in the field of emotion identification based on neurophysiological activity. Nonetheless, there is high variability in results in the literature depending on the neuronal activity measurement, the signal features and the classifier type. The present work aims to provide new methodological insight into machine learning applied to emotion identification based on electrophysiological brain activity. For this reason, we analysed previously recorded EEG activity measured while emotional stimuli, high and low arousal (auditory and visual) were provided to a group of healthy participants. Our target signal to classify was the pre-stimulus onset brain activity. Classification performance of three different classifiers (LDA, SVM and kNN) was compared using both spectral and temporal features. Furthermore, we also contrasted the performance of static and dynamic (time evolving) approaches. The best static feature-classifier combination was the SVM with spectral features (51.8%), followed by LDA with spectral features (51.4%) and kNN with temporal features (51%). The best dynamic feature classifier combination was the SVM with temporal features (63.8%), followed by kNN with temporal features (63.70%) and LDA with temporal features (63.68%). The results show a clear increase in classification accuracy with temporal dynamic features. F1000 Research Limited 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10603316/ /pubmed/37899775 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22202.3 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Bilucaglia M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Method Article
Bilucaglia, Marco
Duma, Gian Marco
Mento, Giovanni
Semenzato, Luca
Tressoldi, Patrizio E.
Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
title Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
title_full Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
title_fullStr Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
title_full_unstemmed Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
title_short Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
title_sort applying machine learning eeg signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
topic Method Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899775
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22202.3
work_keys_str_mv AT bilucagliamarco applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity
AT dumagianmarco applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity
AT mentogiovanni applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity
AT semenzatoluca applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity
AT tressoldipatrizioe applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity