Cargando…
Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity
Machine learning approaches have been fruitfully applied to several neurophysiological signal classification problems. Considering the relevance of emotion in human cognition and behaviour, an important application of machine learning has been found in the field of emotion identification based on ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899775 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22202.3 |
_version_ | 1785126580107870208 |
---|---|
author | Bilucaglia, Marco Duma, Gian Marco Mento, Giovanni Semenzato, Luca Tressoldi, Patrizio E. |
author_facet | Bilucaglia, Marco Duma, Gian Marco Mento, Giovanni Semenzato, Luca Tressoldi, Patrizio E. |
author_sort | Bilucaglia, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Machine learning approaches have been fruitfully applied to several neurophysiological signal classification problems. Considering the relevance of emotion in human cognition and behaviour, an important application of machine learning has been found in the field of emotion identification based on neurophysiological activity. Nonetheless, there is high variability in results in the literature depending on the neuronal activity measurement, the signal features and the classifier type. The present work aims to provide new methodological insight into machine learning applied to emotion identification based on electrophysiological brain activity. For this reason, we analysed previously recorded EEG activity measured while emotional stimuli, high and low arousal (auditory and visual) were provided to a group of healthy participants. Our target signal to classify was the pre-stimulus onset brain activity. Classification performance of three different classifiers (LDA, SVM and kNN) was compared using both spectral and temporal features. Furthermore, we also contrasted the performance of static and dynamic (time evolving) approaches. The best static feature-classifier combination was the SVM with spectral features (51.8%), followed by LDA with spectral features (51.4%) and kNN with temporal features (51%). The best dynamic feature classifier combination was the SVM with temporal features (63.8%), followed by kNN with temporal features (63.70%) and LDA with temporal features (63.68%). The results show a clear increase in classification accuracy with temporal dynamic features. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10603316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106033162023-10-28 Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity Bilucaglia, Marco Duma, Gian Marco Mento, Giovanni Semenzato, Luca Tressoldi, Patrizio E. F1000Res Method Article Machine learning approaches have been fruitfully applied to several neurophysiological signal classification problems. Considering the relevance of emotion in human cognition and behaviour, an important application of machine learning has been found in the field of emotion identification based on neurophysiological activity. Nonetheless, there is high variability in results in the literature depending on the neuronal activity measurement, the signal features and the classifier type. The present work aims to provide new methodological insight into machine learning applied to emotion identification based on electrophysiological brain activity. For this reason, we analysed previously recorded EEG activity measured while emotional stimuli, high and low arousal (auditory and visual) were provided to a group of healthy participants. Our target signal to classify was the pre-stimulus onset brain activity. Classification performance of three different classifiers (LDA, SVM and kNN) was compared using both spectral and temporal features. Furthermore, we also contrasted the performance of static and dynamic (time evolving) approaches. The best static feature-classifier combination was the SVM with spectral features (51.8%), followed by LDA with spectral features (51.4%) and kNN with temporal features (51%). The best dynamic feature classifier combination was the SVM with temporal features (63.8%), followed by kNN with temporal features (63.70%) and LDA with temporal features (63.68%). The results show a clear increase in classification accuracy with temporal dynamic features. F1000 Research Limited 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10603316/ /pubmed/37899775 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22202.3 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Bilucaglia M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Method Article Bilucaglia, Marco Duma, Gian Marco Mento, Giovanni Semenzato, Luca Tressoldi, Patrizio E. Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
title | Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
title_full | Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
title_fullStr | Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
title_short | Applying machine learning EEG signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
title_sort | applying machine learning eeg signal classification to emotion‑related brain anticipatory activity |
topic | Method Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899775 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22202.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bilucagliamarco applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity AT dumagianmarco applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity AT mentogiovanni applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity AT semenzatoluca applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity AT tressoldipatrizioe applyingmachinelearningeegsignalclassificationtoemotionrelatedbrainanticipatoryactivity |