Cargando…
Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
The UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (DISC) launched in 2020 to provide dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, technical assistance, community engagement, and research advancement. DISC developed a pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.630 |
_version_ | 1785126589366796288 |
---|---|
author | Viglione, Clare Rabin, Borsika Fang, Olivia Sheckter, Laura Aarons, Gregory A. Brookman-Frazee, Lauren Stadnick, Nicole A. |
author_facet | Viglione, Clare Rabin, Borsika Fang, Olivia Sheckter, Laura Aarons, Gregory A. Brookman-Frazee, Lauren Stadnick, Nicole A. |
author_sort | Viglione, Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | The UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (DISC) launched in 2020 to provide dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, technical assistance, community engagement, and research advancement. DISC developed a program-wide logic model to inform a process evaluation of member engagement and impact related to DISC services. The DISC Logic Model (DLM) served as the framework for a process evaluation capturing quantitative and qualitative information about scientific activities, outputs, and outcomes. The evaluation involved a multimethod approach with surveys, attendance tracking, feedback forms, documentation of grant outcomes, and promotions metrics (e.g., Twitter engagement). There were 540 DISC Members at the end of year 2 of the DISC. Engagement in the DISC was high with nearly all members endorsing at least one scientific activity. Technical assistance offerings such as DISC Journal Club and consultation were most frequently used. The most common scientific outputs were grant submission (65, 39%), formal mentoring for career award (40, 24%), and paper submission (34, 21%). The DLM facilitated a comprehensive process evaluation of our center. Actionable steps include prioritizing technical assistance, strengthening networking opportunities, identifying streamlined approaches to facilitate DIS grant writing through writing workshops, as well as “office hours” or organized writing leagues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10603357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106033572023-10-28 Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program Viglione, Clare Rabin, Borsika Fang, Olivia Sheckter, Laura Aarons, Gregory A. Brookman-Frazee, Lauren Stadnick, Nicole A. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications The UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (DISC) launched in 2020 to provide dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, technical assistance, community engagement, and research advancement. DISC developed a program-wide logic model to inform a process evaluation of member engagement and impact related to DISC services. The DISC Logic Model (DLM) served as the framework for a process evaluation capturing quantitative and qualitative information about scientific activities, outputs, and outcomes. The evaluation involved a multimethod approach with surveys, attendance tracking, feedback forms, documentation of grant outcomes, and promotions metrics (e.g., Twitter engagement). There were 540 DISC Members at the end of year 2 of the DISC. Engagement in the DISC was high with nearly all members endorsing at least one scientific activity. Technical assistance offerings such as DISC Journal Club and consultation were most frequently used. The most common scientific outputs were grant submission (65, 39%), formal mentoring for career award (40, 24%), and paper submission (34, 21%). The DLM facilitated a comprehensive process evaluation of our center. Actionable steps include prioritizing technical assistance, strengthening networking opportunities, identifying streamlined approaches to facilitate DIS grant writing through writing workshops, as well as “office hours” or organized writing leagues. Cambridge University Press 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10603357/ /pubmed/37900352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.630 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Communications Viglione, Clare Rabin, Borsika Fang, Olivia Sheckter, Laura Aarons, Gregory A. Brookman-Frazee, Lauren Stadnick, Nicole A. Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
title | Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
title_full | Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
title_fullStr | Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
title_short | Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
title_sort | process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program |
topic | Special Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viglioneclare processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram AT rabinborsika processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram AT fangolivia processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram AT sheckterlaura processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram AT aaronsgregorya processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram AT brookmanfrazeelauren processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram AT stadnicknicolea processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram |