Cargando…

Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program

The UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (DISC) launched in 2020 to provide dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, technical assistance, community engagement, and research advancement. DISC developed a pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viglione, Clare, Rabin, Borsika, Fang, Olivia, Sheckter, Laura, Aarons, Gregory A., Brookman-Frazee, Lauren, Stadnick, Nicole A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.630
_version_ 1785126589366796288
author Viglione, Clare
Rabin, Borsika
Fang, Olivia
Sheckter, Laura
Aarons, Gregory A.
Brookman-Frazee, Lauren
Stadnick, Nicole A.
author_facet Viglione, Clare
Rabin, Borsika
Fang, Olivia
Sheckter, Laura
Aarons, Gregory A.
Brookman-Frazee, Lauren
Stadnick, Nicole A.
author_sort Viglione, Clare
collection PubMed
description The UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (DISC) launched in 2020 to provide dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, technical assistance, community engagement, and research advancement. DISC developed a program-wide logic model to inform a process evaluation of member engagement and impact related to DISC services. The DISC Logic Model (DLM) served as the framework for a process evaluation capturing quantitative and qualitative information about scientific activities, outputs, and outcomes. The evaluation involved a multimethod approach with surveys, attendance tracking, feedback forms, documentation of grant outcomes, and promotions metrics (e.g., Twitter engagement). There were 540 DISC Members at the end of year 2 of the DISC. Engagement in the DISC was high with nearly all members endorsing at least one scientific activity. Technical assistance offerings such as DISC Journal Club and consultation were most frequently used. The most common scientific outputs were grant submission (65, 39%), formal mentoring for career award (40, 24%), and paper submission (34, 21%). The DLM facilitated a comprehensive process evaluation of our center. Actionable steps include prioritizing technical assistance, strengthening networking opportunities, identifying streamlined approaches to facilitate DIS grant writing through writing workshops, as well as “office hours” or organized writing leagues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106033572023-10-28 Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program Viglione, Clare Rabin, Borsika Fang, Olivia Sheckter, Laura Aarons, Gregory A. Brookman-Frazee, Lauren Stadnick, Nicole A. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications The UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center (DISC) launched in 2020 to provide dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, technical assistance, community engagement, and research advancement. DISC developed a program-wide logic model to inform a process evaluation of member engagement and impact related to DISC services. The DISC Logic Model (DLM) served as the framework for a process evaluation capturing quantitative and qualitative information about scientific activities, outputs, and outcomes. The evaluation involved a multimethod approach with surveys, attendance tracking, feedback forms, documentation of grant outcomes, and promotions metrics (e.g., Twitter engagement). There were 540 DISC Members at the end of year 2 of the DISC. Engagement in the DISC was high with nearly all members endorsing at least one scientific activity. Technical assistance offerings such as DISC Journal Club and consultation were most frequently used. The most common scientific outputs were grant submission (65, 39%), formal mentoring for career award (40, 24%), and paper submission (34, 21%). The DLM facilitated a comprehensive process evaluation of our center. Actionable steps include prioritizing technical assistance, strengthening networking opportunities, identifying streamlined approaches to facilitate DIS grant writing through writing workshops, as well as “office hours” or organized writing leagues. Cambridge University Press 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10603357/ /pubmed/37900352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.630 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Communications
Viglione, Clare
Rabin, Borsika
Fang, Olivia
Sheckter, Laura
Aarons, Gregory A.
Brookman-Frazee, Lauren
Stadnick, Nicole A.
Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
title Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
title_full Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
title_fullStr Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
title_short Process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
title_sort process evaluation of an academic dissemination and implementation science capacity building program
topic Special Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.630
work_keys_str_mv AT viglioneclare processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram
AT rabinborsika processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram
AT fangolivia processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram
AT sheckterlaura processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram
AT aaronsgregorya processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram
AT brookmanfrazeelauren processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram
AT stadnicknicolea processevaluationofanacademicdisseminationandimplementationsciencecapacitybuildingprogram