Cargando…
Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS
BACKGROUND: Participation in clinical research is associated with better patient outcomes and higher staff retention and satisfaction rates. Nevertheless, patient recruitment to mental health studies is challenging due to a reliance on clinician or patient referrals (standard approach). To empower p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37879674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300774 |
_version_ | 1785126600922103808 |
---|---|
author | Hinze, Verena Henshall, Catherine Smith, Tanya Littlejohns, Jemima Collett, Zoe Jones, Helen Maughan, Daniel Ede, Roger Moll, Deborah Marlowe, Karl Broughton, Nick Geddes, John Cipriani, Andrea |
author_facet | Hinze, Verena Henshall, Catherine Smith, Tanya Littlejohns, Jemima Collett, Zoe Jones, Helen Maughan, Daniel Ede, Roger Moll, Deborah Marlowe, Karl Broughton, Nick Geddes, John Cipriani, Andrea |
author_sort | Hinze, Verena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Participation in clinical research is associated with better patient outcomes and higher staff retention and satisfaction rates. Nevertheless, patient recruitment to mental health studies is challenging due to a reliance on clinician or patient referrals (standard approach). To empower patients and make healthcare research more equitable, we explored a novel researcher-led approach, called ‘Count Me In’ (CMI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a 12-month implementation of CMI in a routine clinical setting. METHODS: CMI was launched in August 2021 in a mental health National Health Service (NHS) Trust in England. Patients (aged 18+) learnt about CMI at their initial clinical appointment. Unless they opted out, they became contactable for research (via research informatics searches). FINDINGS: After 12 months, 368 patients opted out and 22 741 became contactable through CMI, including 2716 through the standard approach and 20 025 through electronic searches (637% increase). Of those identified via electronic searches, 738 were contacted about specific studies and 270 consented to participate. Five themes were identified based on patient and staff experiences of CMI: ‘level of awareness and accessibility of CMI’, ‘perceptions of research and perceived engagement with CMI’, ‘inclusive research practice’, ‘engagement and incentives for research participation’, and ‘relationships between clinical and research settings’. CONCLUSIONS: CMI (vs standard) led to a larger and diverse patient cohort and was favoured by patients and staff. Yet a shift in the NHS research culture is needed to ensure that this diversity translates to actual research participation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Through collaboration with other NHS Trusts and services, key funders (National Institute for Health and Care Research) and new national initiatives (Office for Life Sciences Mental Health Mission), CMI has the potential to address recruitment challenges through rapid patient recruitment into time-sensitive country-wide studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10603415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106034152023-10-28 Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS Hinze, Verena Henshall, Catherine Smith, Tanya Littlejohns, Jemima Collett, Zoe Jones, Helen Maughan, Daniel Ede, Roger Moll, Deborah Marlowe, Karl Broughton, Nick Geddes, John Cipriani, Andrea BMJ Ment Health Equality, Diversity and Inclusion BACKGROUND: Participation in clinical research is associated with better patient outcomes and higher staff retention and satisfaction rates. Nevertheless, patient recruitment to mental health studies is challenging due to a reliance on clinician or patient referrals (standard approach). To empower patients and make healthcare research more equitable, we explored a novel researcher-led approach, called ‘Count Me In’ (CMI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a 12-month implementation of CMI in a routine clinical setting. METHODS: CMI was launched in August 2021 in a mental health National Health Service (NHS) Trust in England. Patients (aged 18+) learnt about CMI at their initial clinical appointment. Unless they opted out, they became contactable for research (via research informatics searches). FINDINGS: After 12 months, 368 patients opted out and 22 741 became contactable through CMI, including 2716 through the standard approach and 20 025 through electronic searches (637% increase). Of those identified via electronic searches, 738 were contacted about specific studies and 270 consented to participate. Five themes were identified based on patient and staff experiences of CMI: ‘level of awareness and accessibility of CMI’, ‘perceptions of research and perceived engagement with CMI’, ‘inclusive research practice’, ‘engagement and incentives for research participation’, and ‘relationships between clinical and research settings’. CONCLUSIONS: CMI (vs standard) led to a larger and diverse patient cohort and was favoured by patients and staff. Yet a shift in the NHS research culture is needed to ensure that this diversity translates to actual research participation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Through collaboration with other NHS Trusts and services, key funders (National Institute for Health and Care Research) and new national initiatives (Office for Life Sciences Mental Health Mission), CMI has the potential to address recruitment challenges through rapid patient recruitment into time-sensitive country-wide studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10603415/ /pubmed/37879674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300774 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Hinze, Verena Henshall, Catherine Smith, Tanya Littlejohns, Jemima Collett, Zoe Jones, Helen Maughan, Daniel Ede, Roger Moll, Deborah Marlowe, Karl Broughton, Nick Geddes, John Cipriani, Andrea Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS |
title | Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS |
title_full | Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS |
title_fullStr | Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS |
title_full_unstemmed | Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS |
title_short | Count Me In: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the NHS |
title_sort | count me in: an inclusive approach towards patient recruitment for clinical research studies in the nhs |
topic | Equality, Diversity and Inclusion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37879674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinzeverena countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT henshallcatherine countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT smithtanya countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT littlejohnsjemima countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT collettzoe countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT joneshelen countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT maughandaniel countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT ederoger countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT molldeborah countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT marlowekarl countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT broughtonnick countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT geddesjohn countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs AT ciprianiandrea countmeinaninclusiveapproachtowardspatientrecruitmentforclinicalresearchstudiesinthenhs |