Cargando…

What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE: This work explores the perceptions of obstetrical clinicians about artificial intelligence (AI) in order to bridge the gap in uptake of AI between research and medical practice. Identifying potential areas where AI can contribute to clinical practice, enables AI research to align with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Anne, Rietveld, Anna, Teunissen, Pim, Hoogendoorn, Mark, Bakker, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37879682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076017
_version_ 1785126601149644800
author Fischer, Anne
Rietveld, Anna
Teunissen, Pim
Hoogendoorn, Mark
Bakker, Petra
author_facet Fischer, Anne
Rietveld, Anna
Teunissen, Pim
Hoogendoorn, Mark
Bakker, Petra
author_sort Fischer, Anne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This work explores the perceptions of obstetrical clinicians about artificial intelligence (AI) in order to bridge the gap in uptake of AI between research and medical practice. Identifying potential areas where AI can contribute to clinical practice, enables AI research to align with the needs of clinicians and ultimately patients. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: A national study conducted in the Netherlands between November 2022 and February 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Dutch clinicians working in obstetrics with varying relevant work experience, gender and age. ANALYSIS: Thematic analysis of qualitative interview transcripts. RESULTS: Thirteen gynaecologists were interviewed about hypothetical scenarios of an implemented AI model. Thematic analysis identified two major themes: perceived usefulness and trust. Usefulness involved AI extending human brain capacity in complex pattern recognition and information processing, reducing contextual influence and saving time. Trust required validation, explainability and successful personal experience. This result shows two paradoxes: first, AI is expected to provide added value by surpassing human capabilities, yet also a need to understand the parameters and their influence on predictions for trust and adoption was expressed. Second, participants recognised the value of incorporating numerous parameters into a model, but they also believed that certain contextual factors should only be considered by humans, as it would be undesirable for AI models to use that information. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetricians’ opinions on the potential value of AI highlight the need for clinician-AI researcher collaboration. Trust can be built through conventional means like randomised controlled trials and guidelines. Holistic impact metrics, such as changes in workflow, not just clinical outcomes, should guide AI model development. Further research is needed for evaluating evolving AI systems beyond traditional validation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106034162023-10-28 What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals Fischer, Anne Rietveld, Anna Teunissen, Pim Hoogendoorn, Mark Bakker, Petra BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: This work explores the perceptions of obstetrical clinicians about artificial intelligence (AI) in order to bridge the gap in uptake of AI between research and medical practice. Identifying potential areas where AI can contribute to clinical practice, enables AI research to align with the needs of clinicians and ultimately patients. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: A national study conducted in the Netherlands between November 2022 and February 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Dutch clinicians working in obstetrics with varying relevant work experience, gender and age. ANALYSIS: Thematic analysis of qualitative interview transcripts. RESULTS: Thirteen gynaecologists were interviewed about hypothetical scenarios of an implemented AI model. Thematic analysis identified two major themes: perceived usefulness and trust. Usefulness involved AI extending human brain capacity in complex pattern recognition and information processing, reducing contextual influence and saving time. Trust required validation, explainability and successful personal experience. This result shows two paradoxes: first, AI is expected to provide added value by surpassing human capabilities, yet also a need to understand the parameters and their influence on predictions for trust and adoption was expressed. Second, participants recognised the value of incorporating numerous parameters into a model, but they also believed that certain contextual factors should only be considered by humans, as it would be undesirable for AI models to use that information. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetricians’ opinions on the potential value of AI highlight the need for clinician-AI researcher collaboration. Trust can be built through conventional means like randomised controlled trials and guidelines. Holistic impact metrics, such as changes in workflow, not just clinical outcomes, should guide AI model development. Further research is needed for evaluating evolving AI systems beyond traditional validation methods. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10603416/ /pubmed/37879682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076017 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Fischer, Anne
Rietveld, Anna
Teunissen, Pim
Hoogendoorn, Mark
Bakker, Petra
What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals
title What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals
title_full What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals
title_fullStr What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals
title_short What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals
title_sort what is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? a qualitative study among healthcare professionals
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37879682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076017
work_keys_str_mv AT fischeranne whatisthefutureofartificialintelligenceinobstetricsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionals
AT rietveldanna whatisthefutureofartificialintelligenceinobstetricsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionals
AT teunissenpim whatisthefutureofartificialintelligenceinobstetricsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionals
AT hoogendoornmark whatisthefutureofartificialintelligenceinobstetricsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionals
AT bakkerpetra whatisthefutureofartificialintelligenceinobstetricsaqualitativestudyamonghealthcareprofessionals