Cargando…

Prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants with a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in April 2023, using databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, CNKI, and SinoMed, without language restriction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Zhongbin, Wang, Jie, Li, Yanming, Zhou, Yongkang, Yan, Xiaoli, Yang, Junqiang, Liu, Huili, Li, Bowen, Ling, Jizu, Pei, Yijie, Zhang, Jianglin, Li, Yuanyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37879719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002080
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants with a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in April 2023, using databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, CNKI, and SinoMed, without language restrictions. Eligible studies included cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of DDH among infants aged 0–12 months. Two independent reviewers manually selected and coded the studies, with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate the prevalence of DDH. Regression analysis examined the trend of DDH prevalence, and stratification analysis explored heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: A total of 65 studies involving 3 451 682 infants were included in the meta-analysis. None of the studies were classified as high quality, four were medium-to-high quality, 50 were low-to-medium quality, and eight were low quality. The pooled prevalence of DDH was 1.40% (95% CI: 0.86 to 2.28, I(2)=100%), and prevalence of dysplasia, subluxation, and dislocation was 1.45% (95% CI: 0.93 to 2.24, I(2)=97%), 0.37% (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.60, I(2)=94%), and 0.21% (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.34, I(2)=92%), respectively. Notably, the overall prevalence has a slight upward trend in the last three decades (β=0.24, p=0.35), but the dysplasia was downward trend (β=−0.48, p<0.01). Girls have higher risk of DDH than boys (1.46% vs 0.66%; Q=5.83, df=1, p=0.02). There were no significant differences based on gender, country, setting, or screening technique. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of DDH among infants is approximately one in a 100, with girls being at higher risk. Though the prevalence of dysplasia has decreased, there is a slight upward trend in overall DDH. Therefore, routine screening for DDH in infants is recommended to prevent more serious developmental problems.