Cargando…

UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol

INTRODUCTION: The number of robotic-assisted hip replacement procedures has expanded globally with the intended aim of improving outcomes. Intraoperative robotic-arm systems add additional costs to total hip replacement (THR) surgery but may improve surgical precision and could contribute to diminis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, James, Davis, Edward T, Parsons, Helen, Stevens, Siobhan, Bradley, Helen, Bruce, Julie, Ellard, David R, Haddad, Fares, Hutchinson, Charles E, Mason, James, Nwankwo, Henry, Metcalfe, Andrew, Smith, Toby, Smith, Jennifer, Warwick, Jane, Skinner, John A, Rees, Sophie, Underwood, Martin, Khatri, Chetan, Wall, Peter David Henry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37852762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079328
_version_ 1785126608554688512
author Griffin, James
Davis, Edward T
Parsons, Helen
Stevens, Siobhan
Bradley, Helen
Bruce, Julie
Ellard, David R
Haddad, Fares
Hutchinson, Charles E
Mason, James
Nwankwo, Henry
Metcalfe, Andrew
Smith, Toby
Smith, Jennifer
Warwick, Jane
Skinner, John A
Rees, Sophie
Underwood, Martin
Khatri, Chetan
Wall, Peter David Henry
author_facet Griffin, James
Davis, Edward T
Parsons, Helen
Stevens, Siobhan
Bradley, Helen
Bruce, Julie
Ellard, David R
Haddad, Fares
Hutchinson, Charles E
Mason, James
Nwankwo, Henry
Metcalfe, Andrew
Smith, Toby
Smith, Jennifer
Warwick, Jane
Skinner, John A
Rees, Sophie
Underwood, Martin
Khatri, Chetan
Wall, Peter David Henry
author_sort Griffin, James
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The number of robotic-assisted hip replacement procedures has expanded globally with the intended aim of improving outcomes. Intraoperative robotic-arm systems add additional costs to total hip replacement (THR) surgery but may improve surgical precision and could contribute to diminished pain and improved function. Additionally, these systems may reduce the need for expensive revision surgery. Surgery with conventional instruments may be just as successful, quick and affordable. There is timely demand for a robust evaluation of this technology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial for Hips (RACER-Hip) is a multicentre (minimum of six UK sites), participant–assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. 378 participants with hip osteoarthritis requiring THR will be randomised (1:1) to receive robotic-assisted THR, or THR using conventional surgical instruments. The primary outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months post-randomisation; a patient-reported outcome measure assessing participants’ awareness of their joint when undertaking daily activities. Secondary outcomes will be collected post-operatively (pain, blood loss and opioid usage) and at 3, 6, 12, 24 months, then 5 and 10 years postrandomisation (including function, pain, health-related quality of life, reoperations and satisfaction). Allocation concealment will be accomplished using a computer-based randomisation procedure on the day of surgery. Blinding methods include the use of sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will adhere to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by an ethics committee (Solihull Research Ethics Committee, 30 June 2021, IRAS: 295831). Participants will provide informed consent before agreeing to participate. Results will be disseminated using peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations at international conferences and through the use of social media. We will develop plans to disseminate to patients and public with our patient partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13374625.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106034532023-10-28 UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol Griffin, James Davis, Edward T Parsons, Helen Stevens, Siobhan Bradley, Helen Bruce, Julie Ellard, David R Haddad, Fares Hutchinson, Charles E Mason, James Nwankwo, Henry Metcalfe, Andrew Smith, Toby Smith, Jennifer Warwick, Jane Skinner, John A Rees, Sophie Underwood, Martin Khatri, Chetan Wall, Peter David Henry BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: The number of robotic-assisted hip replacement procedures has expanded globally with the intended aim of improving outcomes. Intraoperative robotic-arm systems add additional costs to total hip replacement (THR) surgery but may improve surgical precision and could contribute to diminished pain and improved function. Additionally, these systems may reduce the need for expensive revision surgery. Surgery with conventional instruments may be just as successful, quick and affordable. There is timely demand for a robust evaluation of this technology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Robotic Arthroplasty Clinical and cost Effectiveness Randomised controlled trial for Hips (RACER-Hip) is a multicentre (minimum of six UK sites), participant–assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. 378 participants with hip osteoarthritis requiring THR will be randomised (1:1) to receive robotic-assisted THR, or THR using conventional surgical instruments. The primary outcome is the Forgotten Joint Score at 12 months post-randomisation; a patient-reported outcome measure assessing participants’ awareness of their joint when undertaking daily activities. Secondary outcomes will be collected post-operatively (pain, blood loss and opioid usage) and at 3, 6, 12, 24 months, then 5 and 10 years postrandomisation (including function, pain, health-related quality of life, reoperations and satisfaction). Allocation concealment will be accomplished using a computer-based randomisation procedure on the day of surgery. Blinding methods include the use of sham incisions for marker clusters and blinded operation notes. The primary analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle. Results will adhere to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by an ethics committee (Solihull Research Ethics Committee, 30 June 2021, IRAS: 295831). Participants will provide informed consent before agreeing to participate. Results will be disseminated using peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations at international conferences and through the use of social media. We will develop plans to disseminate to patients and public with our patient partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13374625. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10603453/ /pubmed/37852762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079328 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Griffin, James
Davis, Edward T
Parsons, Helen
Stevens, Siobhan
Bradley, Helen
Bruce, Julie
Ellard, David R
Haddad, Fares
Hutchinson, Charles E
Mason, James
Nwankwo, Henry
Metcalfe, Andrew
Smith, Toby
Smith, Jennifer
Warwick, Jane
Skinner, John A
Rees, Sophie
Underwood, Martin
Khatri, Chetan
Wall, Peter David Henry
UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol
title UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol
title_full UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol
title_fullStr UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol
title_short UK robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (RACER-Hip): a study protocol
title_sort uk robotic arthroplasty clinical and cost effectiveness randomised controlled trial for hips (racer-hip): a study protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37852762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079328
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinjames ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT davisedwardt ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT parsonshelen ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT stevenssiobhan ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT bradleyhelen ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT brucejulie ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT ellarddavidr ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT haddadfares ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT hutchinsoncharlese ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT masonjames ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT nwankwohenry ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT metcalfeandrew ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT smithtoby ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT smithjennifer ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT warwickjane ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT skinnerjohna ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT reessophie ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT underwoodmartin ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT khatrichetan ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol
AT wallpeterdavidhenry ukroboticarthroplastyclinicalandcosteffectivenessrandomisedcontrolledtrialforhipsracerhipastudyprotocol