Cargando…
Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37857560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001395 |
_version_ | 1785126614340730880 |
---|---|
author | Kaiser, Peter K Karpecki, Paul M Regillo, Carl D Baumal, Caroline Ryan, Edwin H Ip, Michael S Modi, Yasha Yeu, Elizabeth Nijm, Lisa Farid, Marjan Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke Kim, Terry Shechtman, Diana L Nichols, Kelly Schweitzer, Justin Dunbar, Mark T Rafieetary, Mohammad R Donnenfeld, Eric D |
author_facet | Kaiser, Peter K Karpecki, Paul M Regillo, Carl D Baumal, Caroline Ryan, Edwin H Ip, Michael S Modi, Yasha Yeu, Elizabeth Nijm, Lisa Farid, Marjan Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke Kim, Terry Shechtman, Diana L Nichols, Kelly Schweitzer, Justin Dunbar, Mark T Rafieetary, Mohammad R Donnenfeld, Eric D |
author_sort | Kaiser, Peter K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel process (Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus) consisting of three total surveys and one virtual live meeting held between survey 2 and survey 3. Data were collected from July to October 2022. Participants included expert members of the eye care community that have demonstrated outstanding leadership among peers: a steering committee with three ECPs and a 15-member panel divided between five optometrists, five comprehensive ophthalmologists and five retina specialists. Consensus on statements related to the management of patients with GA was calculated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: At the conclusion of the third survey, consensus was reached on 91% of the 77 statements. Critical consensus topics include: (1) optical coherence tomography as the favoured method to diagnose and monitor GA, (2) preferred practice patterns regarding referral of patients to retina specialists and (3) treatment criteria given the advent of emerging therapeutics for GA. CONCLUSIONS: Generating awareness of early signs of disease development, progression and identifying the best tools to evaluate GA establishes ideal management and referral strategies. Given the paradigm shift in GA management driven by approved therapies, coupled with the fact that the disease is progressive resulting in devastating vision loss, these strategies are critical to ensure best overall outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10603481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106034812023-10-28 Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment Kaiser, Peter K Karpecki, Paul M Regillo, Carl D Baumal, Caroline Ryan, Edwin H Ip, Michael S Modi, Yasha Yeu, Elizabeth Nijm, Lisa Farid, Marjan Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke Kim, Terry Shechtman, Diana L Nichols, Kelly Schweitzer, Justin Dunbar, Mark T Rafieetary, Mohammad R Donnenfeld, Eric D BMJ Open Ophthalmol Retina BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel process (Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus) consisting of three total surveys and one virtual live meeting held between survey 2 and survey 3. Data were collected from July to October 2022. Participants included expert members of the eye care community that have demonstrated outstanding leadership among peers: a steering committee with three ECPs and a 15-member panel divided between five optometrists, five comprehensive ophthalmologists and five retina specialists. Consensus on statements related to the management of patients with GA was calculated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: At the conclusion of the third survey, consensus was reached on 91% of the 77 statements. Critical consensus topics include: (1) optical coherence tomography as the favoured method to diagnose and monitor GA, (2) preferred practice patterns regarding referral of patients to retina specialists and (3) treatment criteria given the advent of emerging therapeutics for GA. CONCLUSIONS: Generating awareness of early signs of disease development, progression and identifying the best tools to evaluate GA establishes ideal management and referral strategies. Given the paradigm shift in GA management driven by approved therapies, coupled with the fact that the disease is progressive resulting in devastating vision loss, these strategies are critical to ensure best overall outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10603481/ /pubmed/37857560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001395 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Retina Kaiser, Peter K Karpecki, Paul M Regillo, Carl D Baumal, Caroline Ryan, Edwin H Ip, Michael S Modi, Yasha Yeu, Elizabeth Nijm, Lisa Farid, Marjan Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke Kim, Terry Shechtman, Diana L Nichols, Kelly Schweitzer, Justin Dunbar, Mark T Rafieetary, Mohammad R Donnenfeld, Eric D Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
title | Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
title_full | Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
title_fullStr | Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
title_short | Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
title_sort | geographic atrophy management consensus (ga-mac): a delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment |
topic | Retina |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37857560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaiserpeterk geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT karpeckipaulm geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT regillocarld geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT baumalcaroline geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT ryanedwinh geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT ipmichaels geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT modiyasha geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT yeuelizabeth geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT nijmlisa geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT faridmarjan geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT rebenitschronaldluke geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT kimterry geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT shechtmandianal geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT nicholskelly geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT schweitzerjustin geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT dunbarmarkt geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT rafieetarymohammadr geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment AT donnenfeldericd geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment |