Cargando…

Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Peter K, Karpecki, Paul M, Regillo, Carl D, Baumal, Caroline, Ryan, Edwin H, Ip, Michael S, Modi, Yasha, Yeu, Elizabeth, Nijm, Lisa, Farid, Marjan, Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke, Kim, Terry, Shechtman, Diana L, Nichols, Kelly, Schweitzer, Justin, Dunbar, Mark T, Rafieetary, Mohammad R, Donnenfeld, Eric D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37857560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001395
_version_ 1785126614340730880
author Kaiser, Peter K
Karpecki, Paul M
Regillo, Carl D
Baumal, Caroline
Ryan, Edwin H
Ip, Michael S
Modi, Yasha
Yeu, Elizabeth
Nijm, Lisa
Farid, Marjan
Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke
Kim, Terry
Shechtman, Diana L
Nichols, Kelly
Schweitzer, Justin
Dunbar, Mark T
Rafieetary, Mohammad R
Donnenfeld, Eric D
author_facet Kaiser, Peter K
Karpecki, Paul M
Regillo, Carl D
Baumal, Caroline
Ryan, Edwin H
Ip, Michael S
Modi, Yasha
Yeu, Elizabeth
Nijm, Lisa
Farid, Marjan
Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke
Kim, Terry
Shechtman, Diana L
Nichols, Kelly
Schweitzer, Justin
Dunbar, Mark T
Rafieetary, Mohammad R
Donnenfeld, Eric D
author_sort Kaiser, Peter K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel process (Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus) consisting of three total surveys and one virtual live meeting held between survey 2 and survey 3. Data were collected from July to October 2022. Participants included expert members of the eye care community that have demonstrated outstanding leadership among peers: a steering committee with three ECPs and a 15-member panel divided between five optometrists, five comprehensive ophthalmologists and five retina specialists. Consensus on statements related to the management of patients with GA was calculated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: At the conclusion of the third survey, consensus was reached on 91% of the 77 statements. Critical consensus topics include: (1) optical coherence tomography as the favoured method to diagnose and monitor GA, (2) preferred practice patterns regarding referral of patients to retina specialists and (3) treatment criteria given the advent of emerging therapeutics for GA. CONCLUSIONS: Generating awareness of early signs of disease development, progression and identifying the best tools to evaluate GA establishes ideal management and referral strategies. Given the paradigm shift in GA management driven by approved therapies, coupled with the fact that the disease is progressive resulting in devastating vision loss, these strategies are critical to ensure best overall outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106034812023-10-28 Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment Kaiser, Peter K Karpecki, Paul M Regillo, Carl D Baumal, Caroline Ryan, Edwin H Ip, Michael S Modi, Yasha Yeu, Elizabeth Nijm, Lisa Farid, Marjan Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke Kim, Terry Shechtman, Diana L Nichols, Kelly Schweitzer, Justin Dunbar, Mark T Rafieetary, Mohammad R Donnenfeld, Eric D BMJ Open Ophthalmol Retina BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel process (Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus) consisting of three total surveys and one virtual live meeting held between survey 2 and survey 3. Data were collected from July to October 2022. Participants included expert members of the eye care community that have demonstrated outstanding leadership among peers: a steering committee with three ECPs and a 15-member panel divided between five optometrists, five comprehensive ophthalmologists and five retina specialists. Consensus on statements related to the management of patients with GA was calculated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: At the conclusion of the third survey, consensus was reached on 91% of the 77 statements. Critical consensus topics include: (1) optical coherence tomography as the favoured method to diagnose and monitor GA, (2) preferred practice patterns regarding referral of patients to retina specialists and (3) treatment criteria given the advent of emerging therapeutics for GA. CONCLUSIONS: Generating awareness of early signs of disease development, progression and identifying the best tools to evaluate GA establishes ideal management and referral strategies. Given the paradigm shift in GA management driven by approved therapies, coupled with the fact that the disease is progressive resulting in devastating vision loss, these strategies are critical to ensure best overall outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10603481/ /pubmed/37857560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001395 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Retina
Kaiser, Peter K
Karpecki, Paul M
Regillo, Carl D
Baumal, Caroline
Ryan, Edwin H
Ip, Michael S
Modi, Yasha
Yeu, Elizabeth
Nijm, Lisa
Farid, Marjan
Rebenitsch, Ronald Luke
Kim, Terry
Shechtman, Diana L
Nichols, Kelly
Schweitzer, Justin
Dunbar, Mark T
Rafieetary, Mohammad R
Donnenfeld, Eric D
Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
title Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
title_full Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
title_fullStr Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
title_full_unstemmed Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
title_short Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
title_sort geographic atrophy management consensus (ga-mac): a delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment
topic Retina
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37857560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001395
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserpeterk geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT karpeckipaulm geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT regillocarld geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT baumalcaroline geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT ryanedwinh geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT ipmichaels geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT modiyasha geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT yeuelizabeth geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT nijmlisa geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT faridmarjan geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT rebenitschronaldluke geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT kimterry geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT shechtmandianal geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT nicholskelly geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT schweitzerjustin geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT dunbarmarkt geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT rafieetarymohammadr geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment
AT donnenfeldericd geographicatrophymanagementconsensusgamacadelphipanelstudyonidentificationdiagnosisandtreatment