Cargando…

Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jantunen, Esa, Partanen, Anu, Turunen, Antti, Varmavuo, Ville, Silvennoinen, Raija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531940
_version_ 1785126642592514048
author Jantunen, Esa
Partanen, Anu
Turunen, Antti
Varmavuo, Ville
Silvennoinen, Raija
author_facet Jantunen, Esa
Partanen, Anu
Turunen, Antti
Varmavuo, Ville
Silvennoinen, Raija
author_sort Jantunen, Esa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered. SUMMARY: Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34(+) cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes. KEY MESSAGE: Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106036222023-10-28 Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Jantunen, Esa Partanen, Anu Turunen, Antti Varmavuo, Ville Silvennoinen, Raija Transfus Med Hemother Review Article BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered. SUMMARY: Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34(+) cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes. KEY MESSAGE: Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT. S. Karger AG 2023-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10603622/ /pubmed/37899993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531940 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jantunen, Esa
Partanen, Anu
Turunen, Antti
Varmavuo, Ville
Silvennoinen, Raija
Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
title Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
title_full Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
title_fullStr Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
title_short Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
title_sort mobilization strategies in myeloma patients intended for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531940
work_keys_str_mv AT jantunenesa mobilizationstrategiesinmyelomapatientsintendedforautologoushematopoieticcelltransplantation
AT partanenanu mobilizationstrategiesinmyelomapatientsintendedforautologoushematopoieticcelltransplantation
AT turunenantti mobilizationstrategiesinmyelomapatientsintendedforautologoushematopoieticcelltransplantation
AT varmavuoville mobilizationstrategiesinmyelomapatientsintendedforautologoushematopoieticcelltransplantation
AT silvennoinenraija mobilizationstrategiesinmyelomapatientsintendedforautologoushematopoieticcelltransplantation