Cargando…

Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase

[Image: see text] A polyhydroxy methacrylate-based stationary reversed phase was used for the determination of coformulants in 20 plant protection products (PPPs). These samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to Q-Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS) in ful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín-García, Beatriz, Romero-González, Roberto, Vidal, José Luis Martínez, Garrido Frenich, Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c03600
_version_ 1785126684153872384
author Martín-García, Beatriz
Romero-González, Roberto
Vidal, José Luis Martínez
Garrido Frenich, Antonia
author_facet Martín-García, Beatriz
Romero-González, Roberto
Vidal, José Luis Martínez
Garrido Frenich, Antonia
author_sort Martín-García, Beatriz
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] A polyhydroxy methacrylate-based stationary reversed phase was used for the determination of coformulants in 20 plant protection products (PPPs). These samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to Q-Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS) in full-scan MS and data-dependent acquisition (ddMS(2)) modes. A total of 92 coformulants were tentatively identified in these formulations by nontargeted and unknown analyses. Twelve out of them were quantified by analytical standards. The most concentrated coformulant was the anionic surfactant dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, whose highest content was obtained in the Score 25 sample (6.87%, w/v). Furthermore, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, 4-s-butyl-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol, 1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, sorbitan monostearate, 2,6-dimethylaniline, palmitamide, and N-lauryldiethanolamine were quantified for the first time in these products. Hence, the polyhydroxy methacrylate-based stationary phase increased the identification of new coformulants in PPPs, being complementary to conventional C18. This strategy could be applied in future studies to estimate potential coformulant residues from PPPs applied to crops.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106038052023-10-28 Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase Martín-García, Beatriz Romero-González, Roberto Vidal, José Luis Martínez Garrido Frenich, Antonia J Agric Food Chem [Image: see text] A polyhydroxy methacrylate-based stationary reversed phase was used for the determination of coformulants in 20 plant protection products (PPPs). These samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to Q-Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS) in full-scan MS and data-dependent acquisition (ddMS(2)) modes. A total of 92 coformulants were tentatively identified in these formulations by nontargeted and unknown analyses. Twelve out of them were quantified by analytical standards. The most concentrated coformulant was the anionic surfactant dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, whose highest content was obtained in the Score 25 sample (6.87%, w/v). Furthermore, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, 4-s-butyl-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol, 1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, sorbitan monostearate, 2,6-dimethylaniline, palmitamide, and N-lauryldiethanolamine were quantified for the first time in these products. Hence, the polyhydroxy methacrylate-based stationary phase increased the identification of new coformulants in PPPs, being complementary to conventional C18. This strategy could be applied in future studies to estimate potential coformulant residues from PPPs applied to crops. American Chemical Society 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10603805/ /pubmed/37846851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c03600 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Martín-García, Beatriz
Romero-González, Roberto
Vidal, José Luis Martínez
Garrido Frenich, Antonia
Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase
title Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase
title_full Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase
title_fullStr Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase
title_full_unstemmed Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase
title_short Unveiling Coformulants in Plant Protection Products by LC-HRMS Using a Polyhydroxy Methacrylate Stationary Phase
title_sort unveiling coformulants in plant protection products by lc-hrms using a polyhydroxy methacrylate stationary phase
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37846851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c03600
work_keys_str_mv AT martingarciabeatriz unveilingcoformulantsinplantprotectionproductsbylchrmsusingapolyhydroxymethacrylatestationaryphase
AT romerogonzalezroberto unveilingcoformulantsinplantprotectionproductsbylchrmsusingapolyhydroxymethacrylatestationaryphase
AT vidaljoseluismartinez unveilingcoformulantsinplantprotectionproductsbylchrmsusingapolyhydroxymethacrylatestationaryphase
AT garridofrenichantonia unveilingcoformulantsinplantprotectionproductsbylchrmsusingapolyhydroxymethacrylatestationaryphase