Cargando…

Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin

Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzariti, Stefano, Mead, Andrew, Toutain, Pierre-Louis, Bond, Ross, Pelligand, Ludovic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548
_version_ 1785126696624586752
author Azzariti, Stefano
Mead, Andrew
Toutain, Pierre-Louis
Bond, Ross
Pelligand, Ludovic
author_facet Azzariti, Stefano
Mead, Andrew
Toutain, Pierre-Louis
Bond, Ross
Pelligand, Ludovic
author_sort Azzariti, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-mechanistic mathematical model, to estimate the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (ƒAUC/MIC or %ƒT > MIC) for the prediction of clinical efficacy of veterinary FQs in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli collected from canine pyoderma cases with a focus on the comparison between marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin. Eight TCKs for each bacterial species (4 susceptible and 4 resistant) were analysed in duplicate. The best PK/PD index was ƒAUC(24h)/MIC in both staphylococci and E. coli. For staphylococci, values of 25–40 h were necessary to achieve a bactericidal effect, whereas the calculated values (25–35 h) for E. coli were lower than those predicting a positive clinical outcome (100–120 h) in murine models. Pradofloxacin showed a higher potency (lower EC(50)) in comparison with marbofloxacin. However, no difference in terms of a maximal possible pharmacological killing rate (E(max)) was observed. Taking into account in vivo exposure at the recommended dosage regimen (3 and 2 mg/kg for pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin, respectively), the overall killing rates (K(drug)) computed were also similar in most instances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106038602023-10-28 Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin Azzariti, Stefano Mead, Andrew Toutain, Pierre-Louis Bond, Ross Pelligand, Ludovic Antibiotics (Basel) Article Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-mechanistic mathematical model, to estimate the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (ƒAUC/MIC or %ƒT > MIC) for the prediction of clinical efficacy of veterinary FQs in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli collected from canine pyoderma cases with a focus on the comparison between marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin. Eight TCKs for each bacterial species (4 susceptible and 4 resistant) were analysed in duplicate. The best PK/PD index was ƒAUC(24h)/MIC in both staphylococci and E. coli. For staphylococci, values of 25–40 h were necessary to achieve a bactericidal effect, whereas the calculated values (25–35 h) for E. coli were lower than those predicting a positive clinical outcome (100–120 h) in murine models. Pradofloxacin showed a higher potency (lower EC(50)) in comparison with marbofloxacin. However, no difference in terms of a maximal possible pharmacological killing rate (E(max)) was observed. Taking into account in vivo exposure at the recommended dosage regimen (3 and 2 mg/kg for pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin, respectively), the overall killing rates (K(drug)) computed were also similar in most instances. MDPI 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10603860/ /pubmed/37887249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Azzariti, Stefano
Mead, Andrew
Toutain, Pierre-Louis
Bond, Ross
Pelligand, Ludovic
Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
title Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
title_full Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
title_fullStr Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
title_full_unstemmed Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
title_short Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
title_sort time-kill analysis of canine skin pathogens: a comparison of pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548
work_keys_str_mv AT azzaritistefano timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin
AT meadandrew timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin
AT toutainpierrelouis timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin
AT bondross timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin
AT pelligandludovic timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin