Cargando…
Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548 |
_version_ | 1785126696624586752 |
---|---|
author | Azzariti, Stefano Mead, Andrew Toutain, Pierre-Louis Bond, Ross Pelligand, Ludovic |
author_facet | Azzariti, Stefano Mead, Andrew Toutain, Pierre-Louis Bond, Ross Pelligand, Ludovic |
author_sort | Azzariti, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-mechanistic mathematical model, to estimate the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (ƒAUC/MIC or %ƒT > MIC) for the prediction of clinical efficacy of veterinary FQs in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli collected from canine pyoderma cases with a focus on the comparison between marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin. Eight TCKs for each bacterial species (4 susceptible and 4 resistant) were analysed in duplicate. The best PK/PD index was ƒAUC(24h)/MIC in both staphylococci and E. coli. For staphylococci, values of 25–40 h were necessary to achieve a bactericidal effect, whereas the calculated values (25–35 h) for E. coli were lower than those predicting a positive clinical outcome (100–120 h) in murine models. Pradofloxacin showed a higher potency (lower EC(50)) in comparison with marbofloxacin. However, no difference in terms of a maximal possible pharmacological killing rate (E(max)) was observed. Taking into account in vivo exposure at the recommended dosage regimen (3 and 2 mg/kg for pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin, respectively), the overall killing rates (K(drug)) computed were also similar in most instances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10603860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106038602023-10-28 Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin Azzariti, Stefano Mead, Andrew Toutain, Pierre-Louis Bond, Ross Pelligand, Ludovic Antibiotics (Basel) Article Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-mechanistic mathematical model, to estimate the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (ƒAUC/MIC or %ƒT > MIC) for the prediction of clinical efficacy of veterinary FQs in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli collected from canine pyoderma cases with a focus on the comparison between marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin. Eight TCKs for each bacterial species (4 susceptible and 4 resistant) were analysed in duplicate. The best PK/PD index was ƒAUC(24h)/MIC in both staphylococci and E. coli. For staphylococci, values of 25–40 h were necessary to achieve a bactericidal effect, whereas the calculated values (25–35 h) for E. coli were lower than those predicting a positive clinical outcome (100–120 h) in murine models. Pradofloxacin showed a higher potency (lower EC(50)) in comparison with marbofloxacin. However, no difference in terms of a maximal possible pharmacological killing rate (E(max)) was observed. Taking into account in vivo exposure at the recommended dosage regimen (3 and 2 mg/kg for pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin, respectively), the overall killing rates (K(drug)) computed were also similar in most instances. MDPI 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10603860/ /pubmed/37887249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Azzariti, Stefano Mead, Andrew Toutain, Pierre-Louis Bond, Ross Pelligand, Ludovic Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin |
title | Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin |
title_full | Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin |
title_fullStr | Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin |
title_full_unstemmed | Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin |
title_short | Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin |
title_sort | time-kill analysis of canine skin pathogens: a comparison of pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azzaritistefano timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin AT meadandrew timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin AT toutainpierrelouis timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin AT bondross timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin AT pelligandludovic timekillanalysisofcanineskinpathogensacomparisonofpradofloxacinandmarbofloxacin |