Cargando…

Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement

Following the enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns, the choice of wound dressing is crucial for providing an adequate environment and suitable conditions for rapid wound healing. As Suprathel(®) and fatty gauze (Jelonet(®)) are the most commonly used dressings in burn centers, the aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heitzmann, Wolfram, Mossing, Mitja, Fuchs, Paul Christian, Akkan, Jan, Seyhan, Harun, Grieb, Gerrit, Opländer, Christian, Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102593
_version_ 1785126712698208256
author Heitzmann, Wolfram
Mossing, Mitja
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Akkan, Jan
Seyhan, Harun
Grieb, Gerrit
Opländer, Christian
Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
author_facet Heitzmann, Wolfram
Mossing, Mitja
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Akkan, Jan
Seyhan, Harun
Grieb, Gerrit
Opländer, Christian
Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
author_sort Heitzmann, Wolfram
collection PubMed
description Following the enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns, the choice of wound dressing is crucial for providing an adequate environment and suitable conditions for rapid wound healing. As Suprathel(®) and fatty gauze (Jelonet(®)) are the most commonly used dressings in burn centers, the aim of this study is to compare Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) in the treatment of deep dermal burns after enzymatic debridement with respect to wound healing, patient comfort, and pain. A total of 23 patients with deep dermal burns of the hand or foot (mean total body surface area of 4.31%) were included in this prospective, unicentric, open, comparative, and intra-individual clinical study. After enzymatic debridement, wounds were divided into two areas: one was treated with Suprathel(®) and the other with Jelonet(®). Suprathel(®) remained on the wounds without dressing changes while Jelonet(®) was regularly changed. Wound healing, infection, bleeding, exudation, time for dressing changes, and pain were documented (from days 2 to 48) after injury. Satisfactory results were obtained in 22 cases; only one patient had to undergo a second debridement followed by skin grafting. No significant difference in time to final wound healing could be observed (18–19 d). Patients reported significantly less pain during the dressing changes for Suprathel(®) compared to Jelonet(®). Furthermore, the wound areas treated with Suprathel(®) showed significantly less exudation and bleeding. Wound infections rarely occurred in both groups. In conclusion, the authors found that both wound dressings could be used to achieve safe and rapid wound healing after the enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns of the hands and feet. However, compared to Jelonet(®), Suprathel(®) showed superior results in terms of patient comfort and pain reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106039252023-10-28 Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement Heitzmann, Wolfram Mossing, Mitja Fuchs, Paul Christian Akkan, Jan Seyhan, Harun Grieb, Gerrit Opländer, Christian Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn Biomedicines Article Following the enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns, the choice of wound dressing is crucial for providing an adequate environment and suitable conditions for rapid wound healing. As Suprathel(®) and fatty gauze (Jelonet(®)) are the most commonly used dressings in burn centers, the aim of this study is to compare Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) in the treatment of deep dermal burns after enzymatic debridement with respect to wound healing, patient comfort, and pain. A total of 23 patients with deep dermal burns of the hand or foot (mean total body surface area of 4.31%) were included in this prospective, unicentric, open, comparative, and intra-individual clinical study. After enzymatic debridement, wounds were divided into two areas: one was treated with Suprathel(®) and the other with Jelonet(®). Suprathel(®) remained on the wounds without dressing changes while Jelonet(®) was regularly changed. Wound healing, infection, bleeding, exudation, time for dressing changes, and pain were documented (from days 2 to 48) after injury. Satisfactory results were obtained in 22 cases; only one patient had to undergo a second debridement followed by skin grafting. No significant difference in time to final wound healing could be observed (18–19 d). Patients reported significantly less pain during the dressing changes for Suprathel(®) compared to Jelonet(®). Furthermore, the wound areas treated with Suprathel(®) showed significantly less exudation and bleeding. Wound infections rarely occurred in both groups. In conclusion, the authors found that both wound dressings could be used to achieve safe and rapid wound healing after the enzymatic debridement of deep dermal burns of the hands and feet. However, compared to Jelonet(®), Suprathel(®) showed superior results in terms of patient comfort and pain reduction. MDPI 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10603925/ /pubmed/37892967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102593 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heitzmann, Wolfram
Mossing, Mitja
Fuchs, Paul Christian
Akkan, Jan
Seyhan, Harun
Grieb, Gerrit
Opländer, Christian
Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement
title Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement
title_full Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement
title_fullStr Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement
title_short Comparative Clinical Study of Suprathel(®) and Jelonet(®) Wound Dressings in Burn Wound Healing after Enzymatic Debridement
title_sort comparative clinical study of suprathel(®) and jelonet(®) wound dressings in burn wound healing after enzymatic debridement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102593
work_keys_str_mv AT heitzmannwolfram comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT mossingmitja comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT fuchspaulchristian comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT akkanjan comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT seyhanharun comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT griebgerrit comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT oplanderchristian comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement
AT schieferjenniferlynn comparativeclinicalstudyofsuprathelandjelonetwounddressingsinburnwoundhealingafterenzymaticdebridement