Cargando…

Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis

With the emergence of additive manufacturing technology, patient-specific cranial implants using 3D printing have massively influenced the field. These implants offer improved surgical outcomes and aesthetic preservation. However, as additive manufacturing in cranial implants is still emerging, ongo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haque, Fariha, Luscher, Anthony F., Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S., Sutradhar, Alok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887630
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8060498
_version_ 1785126718532485120
author Haque, Fariha
Luscher, Anthony F.
Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S.
Sutradhar, Alok
author_facet Haque, Fariha
Luscher, Anthony F.
Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S.
Sutradhar, Alok
author_sort Haque, Fariha
collection PubMed
description With the emergence of additive manufacturing technology, patient-specific cranial implants using 3D printing have massively influenced the field. These implants offer improved surgical outcomes and aesthetic preservation. However, as additive manufacturing in cranial implants is still emerging, ongoing research is investigating their reliability and sustainability. The long-term biomechanical performance of these implants is critically influenced by factors such as implant material, anticipated loads, implant-skull interface geometry, and structural constraints, among others. The efficacy of cranial implants involves an intricate interplay of these factors, with fixation playing a pivotal role. This study addresses two critical concerns: determining the ideal number of fixation points for cranial implants and the optimal curvilinear distance between those points, thereby establishing a minimum threshold. Employing finite element analysis, the research incorporates variables such as implant shapes, sizes, materials, the number of fixation points, and their relative positions. The study reveals that the optimal number of fixation points ranges from four to five, accounting for defect size and shape. Moreover, the optimal curvilinear distance between two screws is approximately 40 mm for smaller implants and 60 mm for larger implants. Optimal fixation placement away from the center mitigates higher deflection due to overhangs. Notably, a symmetric screw orientation reduces deflection, enhancing implant stability. The findings offer crucial insights into optimizing fixation strategies for cranial implants, thereby aiding surgical decision-making guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10603949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106039492023-10-28 Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis Haque, Fariha Luscher, Anthony F. Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S. Sutradhar, Alok Biomimetics (Basel) Article With the emergence of additive manufacturing technology, patient-specific cranial implants using 3D printing have massively influenced the field. These implants offer improved surgical outcomes and aesthetic preservation. However, as additive manufacturing in cranial implants is still emerging, ongoing research is investigating their reliability and sustainability. The long-term biomechanical performance of these implants is critically influenced by factors such as implant material, anticipated loads, implant-skull interface geometry, and structural constraints, among others. The efficacy of cranial implants involves an intricate interplay of these factors, with fixation playing a pivotal role. This study addresses two critical concerns: determining the ideal number of fixation points for cranial implants and the optimal curvilinear distance between those points, thereby establishing a minimum threshold. Employing finite element analysis, the research incorporates variables such as implant shapes, sizes, materials, the number of fixation points, and their relative positions. The study reveals that the optimal number of fixation points ranges from four to five, accounting for defect size and shape. Moreover, the optimal curvilinear distance between two screws is approximately 40 mm for smaller implants and 60 mm for larger implants. Optimal fixation placement away from the center mitigates higher deflection due to overhangs. Notably, a symmetric screw orientation reduces deflection, enhancing implant stability. The findings offer crucial insights into optimizing fixation strategies for cranial implants, thereby aiding surgical decision-making guidelines. MDPI 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10603949/ /pubmed/37887630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8060498 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haque, Fariha
Luscher, Anthony F.
Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S.
Sutradhar, Alok
Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
title Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
title_full Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
title_short Optimization of Fixations for Additively Manufactured Cranial Implants: Insights from Finite Element Analysis
title_sort optimization of fixations for additively manufactured cranial implants: insights from finite element analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887630
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8060498
work_keys_str_mv AT haquefariha optimizationoffixationsforadditivelymanufacturedcranialimplantsinsightsfromfiniteelementanalysis
AT luscheranthonyf optimizationoffixationsforadditivelymanufacturedcranialimplantsinsightsfromfiniteelementanalysis
AT mitchellkerryanns optimizationoffixationsforadditivelymanufacturedcranialimplantsinsightsfromfiniteelementanalysis
AT sutradharalok optimizationoffixationsforadditivelymanufacturedcranialimplantsinsightsfromfiniteelementanalysis