Cargando…

Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials

The final three steps of heme biogenesis exhibit notable differences between di- and mono-derm bacteria. The former employs the protoporphyrin-dependent (PPD) pathway, while the latter utilizes the more recently uncovered coproporphyrin-dependent (CPD) pathway. In order to devise a rapid screen for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Laurie K., Dailey, Tammy A., Anderle, Brenden, Warren, Martin J., Bergonia, Hector A., Dailey, Harry A., Phillips, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13101485
_version_ 1785126862998994944
author Jackson, Laurie K.
Dailey, Tammy A.
Anderle, Brenden
Warren, Martin J.
Bergonia, Hector A.
Dailey, Harry A.
Phillips, John D.
author_facet Jackson, Laurie K.
Dailey, Tammy A.
Anderle, Brenden
Warren, Martin J.
Bergonia, Hector A.
Dailey, Harry A.
Phillips, John D.
author_sort Jackson, Laurie K.
collection PubMed
description The final three steps of heme biogenesis exhibit notable differences between di- and mono-derm bacteria. The former employs the protoporphyrin-dependent (PPD) pathway, while the latter utilizes the more recently uncovered coproporphyrin-dependent (CPD) pathway. In order to devise a rapid screen for potential inhibitors that differentiate the two pathways, the genes associated with the protoporphyrin pathway in an Escherichia coli YFP strain were replaced with those for the CPD pathway from Staphylococcus aureus (SA) through a sliding modular gene replacement recombineering strategy to generate the E. coli strain Sa-CPD-YFP. Potential inhibitors that differentially target the pathways were identified by screening compound libraries against the YFP-producing Sa-CPD-YFP strain in comparison to a CFP-producing E. coli strain. Using a mixed strain assay, inhibitors targeting either the CPD or PPD heme pathways were identified through a decrease in one fluorescent signal but not the other. An initial screen identified both azole and prodigiosin-derived compounds that were shown to specifically target the CPD pathway and which led to the accumulation of coproheme, indicating that the main target of inhibition would appear to be the coproheme decarboxylase (ChdC) enzyme. In silico modeling highlighted that these inhibitors are able to bind within the active site of ChdC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10604556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106045562023-10-28 Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials Jackson, Laurie K. Dailey, Tammy A. Anderle, Brenden Warren, Martin J. Bergonia, Hector A. Dailey, Harry A. Phillips, John D. Biomolecules Article The final three steps of heme biogenesis exhibit notable differences between di- and mono-derm bacteria. The former employs the protoporphyrin-dependent (PPD) pathway, while the latter utilizes the more recently uncovered coproporphyrin-dependent (CPD) pathway. In order to devise a rapid screen for potential inhibitors that differentiate the two pathways, the genes associated with the protoporphyrin pathway in an Escherichia coli YFP strain were replaced with those for the CPD pathway from Staphylococcus aureus (SA) through a sliding modular gene replacement recombineering strategy to generate the E. coli strain Sa-CPD-YFP. Potential inhibitors that differentially target the pathways were identified by screening compound libraries against the YFP-producing Sa-CPD-YFP strain in comparison to a CFP-producing E. coli strain. Using a mixed strain assay, inhibitors targeting either the CPD or PPD heme pathways were identified through a decrease in one fluorescent signal but not the other. An initial screen identified both azole and prodigiosin-derived compounds that were shown to specifically target the CPD pathway and which led to the accumulation of coproheme, indicating that the main target of inhibition would appear to be the coproheme decarboxylase (ChdC) enzyme. In silico modeling highlighted that these inhibitors are able to bind within the active site of ChdC. MDPI 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10604556/ /pubmed/37892169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13101485 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jackson, Laurie K.
Dailey, Tammy A.
Anderle, Brenden
Warren, Martin J.
Bergonia, Hector A.
Dailey, Harry A.
Phillips, John D.
Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials
title Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials
title_full Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials
title_fullStr Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials
title_full_unstemmed Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials
title_short Exploiting Differences in Heme Biosynthesis between Bacterial Species to Screen for Novel Antimicrobials
title_sort exploiting differences in heme biosynthesis between bacterial species to screen for novel antimicrobials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom13101485
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksonlauriek exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials
AT daileytammya exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials
AT anderlebrenden exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials
AT warrenmartinj exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials
AT bergoniahectora exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials
AT daileyharrya exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials
AT phillipsjohnd exploitingdifferencesinhemebiosynthesisbetweenbacterialspeciestoscreenfornovelantimicrobials