Cargando…

Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: The unilaterally extrapedicular approach is adopted increasingly to perform balloon kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures, which is intended to improve radiological and clinical efficacy. We compared the efficacy and safety of this method with a unilaterally transpedicula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Hao, Li, Jun, Ding, Haoyang, Deng, Yi, Deng, Zhongliang, Jiang, Qilong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37884925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04267-6
_version_ 1785126923883511808
author Hong, Hao
Li, Jun
Ding, Haoyang
Deng, Yi
Deng, Zhongliang
Jiang, Qilong
author_facet Hong, Hao
Li, Jun
Ding, Haoyang
Deng, Yi
Deng, Zhongliang
Jiang, Qilong
author_sort Hong, Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The unilaterally extrapedicular approach is adopted increasingly to perform balloon kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures, which is intended to improve radiological and clinical efficacy. We compared the efficacy and safety of this method with a unilaterally transpedicular approach. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolling participants with a one-level osteoporotic lumbar fracture in less than 1 month. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo kyphoplasty via either a unilaterally extrapedicular approach (treatment group) or a unilaterally transpedicular approach (control group). The primary outcome was the difference in change from baseline to 1 month in visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups. Secondary outcome measures included vertebral height ratio, operation time, fluoroscopic times, hemoglobin loss, and cement leakage between groups. Data were analyzed by intention to treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 80 participants were assigned to the treatment group (n = 40) and control group (n = 40), with three and two patients lost to follow-up during 12 months in the two groups, respectively. At 1 month postoperatively, the treatment group showed a greater reduction in VAS score from baseline, compared with the control group (mean difference between groups = 0.63, 95%CI 0.19–1.06). There were no significant between-group differences in restoration in anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in the rate of cement leakage and perioperative hemoglobin loss (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with balloon kyphoplasty via the unilaterally transpedicular approach in treating lumbar OVCFs, the unilaterally extrapedicular approach appears to be promising in achieving effective pain relief, adequate cement infusion, short operation time, less fluoroscopy exposure, and comparable risk of cement leakage and vessel injury. It is an alternative approach for lumbar OVCFs treated with kyphoplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10604808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106048082023-10-28 Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study Hong, Hao Li, Jun Ding, Haoyang Deng, Yi Deng, Zhongliang Jiang, Qilong J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The unilaterally extrapedicular approach is adopted increasingly to perform balloon kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures, which is intended to improve radiological and clinical efficacy. We compared the efficacy and safety of this method with a unilaterally transpedicular approach. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolling participants with a one-level osteoporotic lumbar fracture in less than 1 month. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo kyphoplasty via either a unilaterally extrapedicular approach (treatment group) or a unilaterally transpedicular approach (control group). The primary outcome was the difference in change from baseline to 1 month in visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups. Secondary outcome measures included vertebral height ratio, operation time, fluoroscopic times, hemoglobin loss, and cement leakage between groups. Data were analyzed by intention to treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 80 participants were assigned to the treatment group (n = 40) and control group (n = 40), with three and two patients lost to follow-up during 12 months in the two groups, respectively. At 1 month postoperatively, the treatment group showed a greater reduction in VAS score from baseline, compared with the control group (mean difference between groups = 0.63, 95%CI 0.19–1.06). There were no significant between-group differences in restoration in anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in the rate of cement leakage and perioperative hemoglobin loss (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with balloon kyphoplasty via the unilaterally transpedicular approach in treating lumbar OVCFs, the unilaterally extrapedicular approach appears to be promising in achieving effective pain relief, adequate cement infusion, short operation time, less fluoroscopy exposure, and comparable risk of cement leakage and vessel injury. It is an alternative approach for lumbar OVCFs treated with kyphoplasty. BioMed Central 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10604808/ /pubmed/37884925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04267-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hong, Hao
Li, Jun
Ding, Haoyang
Deng, Yi
Deng, Zhongliang
Jiang, Qilong
Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
title Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
title_full Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
title_short Unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
title_sort unilaterally extrapedicular versus transpedicular kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures: a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37884925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04267-6
work_keys_str_mv AT honghao unilaterallyextrapedicularversustranspedicularkyphoplastyintreatingosteoporoticlumbarfracturesarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lijun unilaterallyextrapedicularversustranspedicularkyphoplastyintreatingosteoporoticlumbarfracturesarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dinghaoyang unilaterallyextrapedicularversustranspedicularkyphoplastyintreatingosteoporoticlumbarfracturesarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dengyi unilaterallyextrapedicularversustranspedicularkyphoplastyintreatingosteoporoticlumbarfracturesarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dengzhongliang unilaterallyextrapedicularversustranspedicularkyphoplastyintreatingosteoporoticlumbarfracturesarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jiangqilong unilaterallyextrapedicularversustranspedicularkyphoplastyintreatingosteoporoticlumbarfracturesarandomizedcontrolledstudy