Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Background: The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome is increasing, but the number and quality of clinical practice guidelines available are unknown. This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise and evaluate clinical practice guidelines for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Methods: A system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Zoe, Gilbert, Yasmin, Thananjeyan, Arabhi, Cope, James, Morton, Rachael L., Li, Annie, Pham, Cecile T., Ward, Meredith, Oei, Ju Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10101685
_version_ 1785126983173144576
author Wei, Zoe
Gilbert, Yasmin
Thananjeyan, Arabhi
Cope, James
Morton, Rachael L.
Li, Annie
Pham, Cecile T.
Ward, Meredith
Oei, Ju Lee
author_facet Wei, Zoe
Gilbert, Yasmin
Thananjeyan, Arabhi
Cope, James
Morton, Rachael L.
Li, Annie
Pham, Cecile T.
Ward, Meredith
Oei, Ju Lee
author_sort Wei, Zoe
collection PubMed
description Background: The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome is increasing, but the number and quality of clinical practice guidelines available are unknown. This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise and evaluate clinical practice guidelines for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Methods: A systematic search of databases and the grey literature was conducted between 1 June and 1 July 2022. Full-text guidelines published by national or state-wide institutions were included. The recommendations from each guideline were extracted. The AGREE-II instrument was used to assess guideline quality. Sufficient-quality scores were defined as >60 and good-quality scores were >80 for each domain of AGREE-II. Results: A total of 1703 records were identified, and 22 guidelines from the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, published between 2012 to 2021, were included. The quality scores were low, with median scores of 37/100 for stakeholder involvement, 33/100 for methodology, 34/100 for applicability and 0 for editorial independence. Scope and purpose scored 72/100, and presentation scored 85/100. Sixteen (73%) guidelines did not meet the cut-offs for clinical use. Conclusion: Many guidelines were of insufficient quality to guide clinical practice for neonatal abstinence syndrome. This emphasises the need for high-quality studies to inform clinical practice guidelines, improve care and reduce the risk of poor outcomes in these high-risk infants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106050602023-10-28 A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Wei, Zoe Gilbert, Yasmin Thananjeyan, Arabhi Cope, James Morton, Rachael L. Li, Annie Pham, Cecile T. Ward, Meredith Oei, Ju Lee Children (Basel) Systematic Review Background: The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome is increasing, but the number and quality of clinical practice guidelines available are unknown. This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise and evaluate clinical practice guidelines for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Methods: A systematic search of databases and the grey literature was conducted between 1 June and 1 July 2022. Full-text guidelines published by national or state-wide institutions were included. The recommendations from each guideline were extracted. The AGREE-II instrument was used to assess guideline quality. Sufficient-quality scores were defined as >60 and good-quality scores were >80 for each domain of AGREE-II. Results: A total of 1703 records were identified, and 22 guidelines from the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, published between 2012 to 2021, were included. The quality scores were low, with median scores of 37/100 for stakeholder involvement, 33/100 for methodology, 34/100 for applicability and 0 for editorial independence. Scope and purpose scored 72/100, and presentation scored 85/100. Sixteen (73%) guidelines did not meet the cut-offs for clinical use. Conclusion: Many guidelines were of insufficient quality to guide clinical practice for neonatal abstinence syndrome. This emphasises the need for high-quality studies to inform clinical practice guidelines, improve care and reduce the risk of poor outcomes in these high-risk infants. MDPI 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10605060/ /pubmed/37892348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10101685 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wei, Zoe
Gilbert, Yasmin
Thananjeyan, Arabhi
Cope, James
Morton, Rachael L.
Li, Annie
Pham, Cecile T.
Ward, Meredith
Oei, Ju Lee
A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
title A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
title_full A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
title_short A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
title_sort systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for neonatal abstinence syndrome
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10101685
work_keys_str_mv AT weizoe asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT gilbertyasmin asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT thananjeyanarabhi asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT copejames asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT mortonrachaell asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT liannie asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT phamcecilet asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT wardmeredith asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT oeijulee asystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT weizoe systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT gilbertyasmin systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT thananjeyanarabhi systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT copejames systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT mortonrachaell systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT liannie systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT phamcecilet systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT wardmeredith systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome
AT oeijulee systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforneonatalabstinencesyndrome