Cargando…

A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Courtney J., Wechsler, Stephen, Ejem, Deborah B., Khalidi, Sarah, Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine, Morency, Jamme L., Thorp, Karen E., Codini, Megan E., Newman, Robin M., Echols, Jennifer, Cloyd, Danielle Z., dos Anjos, Sarah, Muse, Colleen, Gallups, Sarah, Goedeken, Susan C., Flannery, Kaitlin, Bakitas, Marie A., Hegel, Mark T., Lyons, Kathleen Doyle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100660
_version_ 1785126993549852672
author Stevens, Courtney J.
Wechsler, Stephen
Ejem, Deborah B.
Khalidi, Sarah
Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine
Morency, Jamme L.
Thorp, Karen E.
Codini, Megan E.
Newman, Robin M.
Echols, Jennifer
Cloyd, Danielle Z.
dos Anjos, Sarah
Muse, Colleen
Gallups, Sarah
Goedeken, Susan C.
Flannery, Kaitlin
Bakitas, Marie A.
Hegel, Mark T.
Lyons, Kathleen Doyle
author_facet Stevens, Courtney J.
Wechsler, Stephen
Ejem, Deborah B.
Khalidi, Sarah
Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine
Morency, Jamme L.
Thorp, Karen E.
Codini, Megan E.
Newman, Robin M.
Echols, Jennifer
Cloyd, Danielle Z.
dos Anjos, Sarah
Muse, Colleen
Gallups, Sarah
Goedeken, Susan C.
Flannery, Kaitlin
Bakitas, Marie A.
Hegel, Mark T.
Lyons, Kathleen Doyle
author_sort Stevens, Courtney J.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with social roles and activities, as compared to an attention control condition. This process evaluation examined (a) fidelity monitoring scores; (b) participants’ perceived benefit ratings for gaining confidence, reducing distress, adjusting habits and routines, setting goals, and increasing exercise; and (c) field notes, email communications, and transcripts of coach supervision and debriefing sessions. The behavioral and attention control conditions were delivered with a high degree of fidelity (global quality rating score for the BA/PS condition was M = 4.6 (SD = 0.6) and M = 4.9 (SD = 0.3) for the attention control condition, where “5” is the highest rating). The behavioral intervention participants perceived greater benefits than the control participants pertaining to goal setting, t(248) = 5.73, p = <0.0001, adjusting habits and routines, t(248) = 2.94, p = 0.0036, and increasing exercise, t(248) = 4.66, p = <0.0001. Moreover, coaches’ perceptions regarding the behavioral intervention’s therapeutic aspects aligned with the study’s a priori conceptual model including the use of a structured process to set small, observable goals and facilitate the independent use of problem-solving skills. However, coaches also noted that aspects of the attention control condition, including the perceived relevance of the educational content and opportunities for social support, may have made it more therapeutically potent than intended. The pandemic may have affected the activity goals behavioral intervention participants could set as well as augmented the relevancy of social support provided in both conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106051042023-10-28 A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic Stevens, Courtney J. Wechsler, Stephen Ejem, Deborah B. Khalidi, Sarah Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine Morency, Jamme L. Thorp, Karen E. Codini, Megan E. Newman, Robin M. Echols, Jennifer Cloyd, Danielle Z. dos Anjos, Sarah Muse, Colleen Gallups, Sarah Goedeken, Susan C. Flannery, Kaitlin Bakitas, Marie A. Hegel, Mark T. Lyons, Kathleen Doyle Curr Oncol Article The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with social roles and activities, as compared to an attention control condition. This process evaluation examined (a) fidelity monitoring scores; (b) participants’ perceived benefit ratings for gaining confidence, reducing distress, adjusting habits and routines, setting goals, and increasing exercise; and (c) field notes, email communications, and transcripts of coach supervision and debriefing sessions. The behavioral and attention control conditions were delivered with a high degree of fidelity (global quality rating score for the BA/PS condition was M = 4.6 (SD = 0.6) and M = 4.9 (SD = 0.3) for the attention control condition, where “5” is the highest rating). The behavioral intervention participants perceived greater benefits than the control participants pertaining to goal setting, t(248) = 5.73, p = <0.0001, adjusting habits and routines, t(248) = 2.94, p = 0.0036, and increasing exercise, t(248) = 4.66, p = <0.0001. Moreover, coaches’ perceptions regarding the behavioral intervention’s therapeutic aspects aligned with the study’s a priori conceptual model including the use of a structured process to set small, observable goals and facilitate the independent use of problem-solving skills. However, coaches also noted that aspects of the attention control condition, including the perceived relevance of the educational content and opportunities for social support, may have made it more therapeutically potent than intended. The pandemic may have affected the activity goals behavioral intervention participants could set as well as augmented the relevancy of social support provided in both conditions. MDPI 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10605104/ /pubmed/37887560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100660 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stevens, Courtney J.
Wechsler, Stephen
Ejem, Deborah B.
Khalidi, Sarah
Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine
Morency, Jamme L.
Thorp, Karen E.
Codini, Megan E.
Newman, Robin M.
Echols, Jennifer
Cloyd, Danielle Z.
dos Anjos, Sarah
Muse, Colleen
Gallups, Sarah
Goedeken, Susan C.
Flannery, Kaitlin
Bakitas, Marie A.
Hegel, Mark T.
Lyons, Kathleen Doyle
A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort process evaluation of intervention delivery for a cancer survivorship rehabilitation clinical trial conducted during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100660
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenscourtneyj aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT wechslerstephen aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ejemdeborahb aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT khalidisarah aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT coffeedunningjazmine aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT morencyjammel aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT thorpkarene aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT codinimegane aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT newmanrobinm aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT echolsjennifer aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT cloyddaniellez aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dosanjossarah aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT musecolleen aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT gallupssarah aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT goedekensusanc aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT flannerykaitlin aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT bakitasmariea aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hegelmarkt aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT lyonskathleendoyle aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT stevenscourtneyj processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT wechslerstephen processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ejemdeborahb processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT khalidisarah processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT coffeedunningjazmine processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT morencyjammel processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT thorpkarene processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT codinimegane processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT newmanrobinm processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT echolsjennifer processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT cloyddaniellez processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dosanjossarah processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT musecolleen processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT gallupssarah processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT goedekensusanc processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT flannerykaitlin processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT bakitasmariea processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hegelmarkt processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic
AT lyonskathleendoyle processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic