Cargando…
A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100660 |
_version_ | 1785126993549852672 |
---|---|
author | Stevens, Courtney J. Wechsler, Stephen Ejem, Deborah B. Khalidi, Sarah Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine Morency, Jamme L. Thorp, Karen E. Codini, Megan E. Newman, Robin M. Echols, Jennifer Cloyd, Danielle Z. dos Anjos, Sarah Muse, Colleen Gallups, Sarah Goedeken, Susan C. Flannery, Kaitlin Bakitas, Marie A. Hegel, Mark T. Lyons, Kathleen Doyle |
author_facet | Stevens, Courtney J. Wechsler, Stephen Ejem, Deborah B. Khalidi, Sarah Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine Morency, Jamme L. Thorp, Karen E. Codini, Megan E. Newman, Robin M. Echols, Jennifer Cloyd, Danielle Z. dos Anjos, Sarah Muse, Colleen Gallups, Sarah Goedeken, Susan C. Flannery, Kaitlin Bakitas, Marie A. Hegel, Mark T. Lyons, Kathleen Doyle |
author_sort | Stevens, Courtney J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with social roles and activities, as compared to an attention control condition. This process evaluation examined (a) fidelity monitoring scores; (b) participants’ perceived benefit ratings for gaining confidence, reducing distress, adjusting habits and routines, setting goals, and increasing exercise; and (c) field notes, email communications, and transcripts of coach supervision and debriefing sessions. The behavioral and attention control conditions were delivered with a high degree of fidelity (global quality rating score for the BA/PS condition was M = 4.6 (SD = 0.6) and M = 4.9 (SD = 0.3) for the attention control condition, where “5” is the highest rating). The behavioral intervention participants perceived greater benefits than the control participants pertaining to goal setting, t(248) = 5.73, p = <0.0001, adjusting habits and routines, t(248) = 2.94, p = 0.0036, and increasing exercise, t(248) = 4.66, p = <0.0001. Moreover, coaches’ perceptions regarding the behavioral intervention’s therapeutic aspects aligned with the study’s a priori conceptual model including the use of a structured process to set small, observable goals and facilitate the independent use of problem-solving skills. However, coaches also noted that aspects of the attention control condition, including the perceived relevance of the educational content and opportunities for social support, may have made it more therapeutically potent than intended. The pandemic may have affected the activity goals behavioral intervention participants could set as well as augmented the relevancy of social support provided in both conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10605104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106051042023-10-28 A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic Stevens, Courtney J. Wechsler, Stephen Ejem, Deborah B. Khalidi, Sarah Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine Morency, Jamme L. Thorp, Karen E. Codini, Megan E. Newman, Robin M. Echols, Jennifer Cloyd, Danielle Z. dos Anjos, Sarah Muse, Colleen Gallups, Sarah Goedeken, Susan C. Flannery, Kaitlin Bakitas, Marie A. Hegel, Mark T. Lyons, Kathleen Doyle Curr Oncol Article The purpose of the present study was to conduct a process evaluation of intervention delivery for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (NCT 03915548). The RCT tested the effects of a telephone-delivered behavioral intervention on changes in breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with social roles and activities, as compared to an attention control condition. This process evaluation examined (a) fidelity monitoring scores; (b) participants’ perceived benefit ratings for gaining confidence, reducing distress, adjusting habits and routines, setting goals, and increasing exercise; and (c) field notes, email communications, and transcripts of coach supervision and debriefing sessions. The behavioral and attention control conditions were delivered with a high degree of fidelity (global quality rating score for the BA/PS condition was M = 4.6 (SD = 0.6) and M = 4.9 (SD = 0.3) for the attention control condition, where “5” is the highest rating). The behavioral intervention participants perceived greater benefits than the control participants pertaining to goal setting, t(248) = 5.73, p = <0.0001, adjusting habits and routines, t(248) = 2.94, p = 0.0036, and increasing exercise, t(248) = 4.66, p = <0.0001. Moreover, coaches’ perceptions regarding the behavioral intervention’s therapeutic aspects aligned with the study’s a priori conceptual model including the use of a structured process to set small, observable goals and facilitate the independent use of problem-solving skills. However, coaches also noted that aspects of the attention control condition, including the perceived relevance of the educational content and opportunities for social support, may have made it more therapeutically potent than intended. The pandemic may have affected the activity goals behavioral intervention participants could set as well as augmented the relevancy of social support provided in both conditions. MDPI 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10605104/ /pubmed/37887560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100660 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Stevens, Courtney J. Wechsler, Stephen Ejem, Deborah B. Khalidi, Sarah Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine Morency, Jamme L. Thorp, Karen E. Codini, Megan E. Newman, Robin M. Echols, Jennifer Cloyd, Danielle Z. dos Anjos, Sarah Muse, Colleen Gallups, Sarah Goedeken, Susan C. Flannery, Kaitlin Bakitas, Marie A. Hegel, Mark T. Lyons, Kathleen Doyle A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | process evaluation of intervention delivery for a cancer survivorship rehabilitation clinical trial conducted during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevenscourtneyj aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT wechslerstephen aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT ejemdeborahb aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT khalidisarah aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT coffeedunningjazmine aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT morencyjammel aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT thorpkarene aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT codinimegane aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT newmanrobinm aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT echolsjennifer aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT cloyddaniellez aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT dosanjossarah aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT musecolleen aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT gallupssarah aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT goedekensusanc aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT flannerykaitlin aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT bakitasmariea aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT hegelmarkt aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT lyonskathleendoyle aprocessevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT stevenscourtneyj processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT wechslerstephen processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT ejemdeborahb processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT khalidisarah processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT coffeedunningjazmine processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT morencyjammel processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT thorpkarene processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT codinimegane processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT newmanrobinm processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT echolsjennifer processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT cloyddaniellez processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT dosanjossarah processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT musecolleen processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT gallupssarah processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT goedekensusanc processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT flannerykaitlin processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT bakitasmariea processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT hegelmarkt processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic AT lyonskathleendoyle processevaluationofinterventiondeliveryforacancersurvivorshiprehabilitationclinicaltrialconductedduringthecovid19pandemic |