Cargando…

Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding

Temporary binding of visual features enables objects to be stored and maintained in the visual working memory as a singular structure, irrespective of its inherent complexity. Although working memory capacity is reduced in aging, previous behavioral studies suggest that binding is preserved. Using e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werrmann, Michelle, Niedeggen, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101389
_version_ 1785127032918638592
author Werrmann, Michelle
Niedeggen, Michael
author_facet Werrmann, Michelle
Niedeggen, Michael
author_sort Werrmann, Michelle
collection PubMed
description Temporary binding of visual features enables objects to be stored and maintained in the visual working memory as a singular structure, irrespective of its inherent complexity. Although working memory capacity is reduced in aging, previous behavioral studies suggest that binding is preserved. Using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we tested whether stimulus encoding is different in younger (N = 26, mean age = 28.5) and older (N = 22; mean age = 67.4) participants in a change detection task. The processing costs of binding were defined by the difference between feature-alone (color or shape) and feature-binding (color–shape) conditions. The behavioral data revealed that discrimination ability was reduced in the feature-binding condition, and that this effect was more attenuated in older participants. A corresponding ERP effect was not found in early components related to visual feature detection and processing (posterior N1 and frontal P2). However, the late positive complex (LPC) was more often expressed in the feature-binding condition, and the increase in amplitude was more pronounced in older participants. The LPC can be related to attentional allocation processes which might support the maintenance of the more complex stimulus representation in the binding task. However, the selective neural overactivation in the encoding phase observed in older participants does not prevent swap errors in the subsequent retrieval phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106052702023-10-28 Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding Werrmann, Michelle Niedeggen, Michael Brain Sci Article Temporary binding of visual features enables objects to be stored and maintained in the visual working memory as a singular structure, irrespective of its inherent complexity. Although working memory capacity is reduced in aging, previous behavioral studies suggest that binding is preserved. Using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we tested whether stimulus encoding is different in younger (N = 26, mean age = 28.5) and older (N = 22; mean age = 67.4) participants in a change detection task. The processing costs of binding were defined by the difference between feature-alone (color or shape) and feature-binding (color–shape) conditions. The behavioral data revealed that discrimination ability was reduced in the feature-binding condition, and that this effect was more attenuated in older participants. A corresponding ERP effect was not found in early components related to visual feature detection and processing (posterior N1 and frontal P2). However, the late positive complex (LPC) was more often expressed in the feature-binding condition, and the increase in amplitude was more pronounced in older participants. The LPC can be related to attentional allocation processes which might support the maintenance of the more complex stimulus representation in the binding task. However, the selective neural overactivation in the encoding phase observed in older participants does not prevent swap errors in the subsequent retrieval phase. MDPI 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10605270/ /pubmed/37891758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101389 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Werrmann, Michelle
Niedeggen, Michael
Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding
title Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding
title_full Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding
title_fullStr Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding
title_full_unstemmed Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding
title_short Age-Specific Effects of Visual Feature Binding
title_sort age-specific effects of visual feature binding
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101389
work_keys_str_mv AT werrmannmichelle agespecificeffectsofvisualfeaturebinding
AT niedeggenmichael agespecificeffectsofvisualfeaturebinding