Cargando…

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: To choose the appropriate treatment for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), proper diagnosis and risk assessment of the disease is mandatory. This study reviews some of the diagnostic tools, and the patient- and disease-related prognostic factors that affect the ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitaraf, Masoud, Ghafoori Yazdi, Mahmood, Amini, Erfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15204987
_version_ 1785127079995506688
author Bitaraf, Masoud
Ghafoori Yazdi, Mahmood
Amini, Erfan
author_facet Bitaraf, Masoud
Ghafoori Yazdi, Mahmood
Amini, Erfan
author_sort Bitaraf, Masoud
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: To choose the appropriate treatment for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), proper diagnosis and risk assessment of the disease is mandatory. This study reviews some of the diagnostic tools, and the patient- and disease-related prognostic factors that affect the outcome. Predictive tools designed by these factors help determine which patients should undergo radical nephroureterectomy. Other tools help post-operative decisions regarding the use of chemotherapy and planning follow-up sessions. The available pre-operative predictive tools and post-operative nomograms are discussed. A revision of the current classification of patients to low- and high-risk groups is recommended, to expand the number of patients benefiting from kidney-sparing surgeries. ABSTRACT: Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106054612023-10-28 Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review Bitaraf, Masoud Ghafoori Yazdi, Mahmood Amini, Erfan Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: To choose the appropriate treatment for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), proper diagnosis and risk assessment of the disease is mandatory. This study reviews some of the diagnostic tools, and the patient- and disease-related prognostic factors that affect the outcome. Predictive tools designed by these factors help determine which patients should undergo radical nephroureterectomy. Other tools help post-operative decisions regarding the use of chemotherapy and planning follow-up sessions. The available pre-operative predictive tools and post-operative nomograms are discussed. A revision of the current classification of patients to low- and high-risk groups is recommended, to expand the number of patients benefiting from kidney-sparing surgeries. ABSTRACT: Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed. MDPI 2023-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10605461/ /pubmed/37894354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15204987 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bitaraf, Masoud
Ghafoori Yazdi, Mahmood
Amini, Erfan
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review
title Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review
title_full Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review
title_fullStr Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review
title_full_unstemmed Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review
title_short Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review
title_sort upper tract urothelial carcinoma (utuc) diagnosis and risk stratification: a comprehensive review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15204987
work_keys_str_mv AT bitarafmasoud uppertracturothelialcarcinomautucdiagnosisandriskstratificationacomprehensivereview
AT ghafooriyazdimahmood uppertracturothelialcarcinomautucdiagnosisandriskstratificationacomprehensivereview
AT aminierfan uppertracturothelialcarcinomautucdiagnosisandriskstratificationacomprehensivereview