Cargando…
Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203200 |
_version_ | 1785127086468366336 |
---|---|
author | Arakane, Takayuki Okada, Masahiro Nakazawa, Yujiro Tago, Kenichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroki Mizuno, Mariko Abe, Hayato Higaki, Tokio Okamura, Yukiyasu Takayama, Tadatoshi |
author_facet | Arakane, Takayuki Okada, Masahiro Nakazawa, Yujiro Tago, Kenichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroki Mizuno, Mariko Abe, Hayato Higaki, Tokio Okamura, Yukiyasu Takayama, Tadatoshi |
author_sort | Arakane, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, such as slow diffusion-coefficient related to molecular diffusion (D), fast diffusion-coefficient related to perfusion in microvessels (D*), apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC), and perfusion related diffusion-fraction (f), were calculated by two observers (R1/R2). D (p = 0.718 for R1, p = 0.087 for R2) and D* (p = 0.513, p = 0.708, respectively) showed a poor correlation with HF. ADC (p = 0.034, p = 0.528, respectively) and f (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively) decreased as HF progressed, whereas SV/BSA increased (p = 0.015 for R1). The AUCs of SV/BSA (0.649–0.698 for R1) were higher than those of f (0.575–0.683 for R1 + R2) for severe HF (≥F3–4 and ≥F4), although AUCs of f (0.705–0.790 for R1 + R2) were higher than those of SV/BSA (0.628 for R1) for mild or no HF (≤F0–1). No significant differences to identify HF were observed between IVIM and SV/BSA. SV/BSA allows a higher estimation for evaluating severe HF than IVIM. IVIM is more suitable than SV/BSA for the assessment of mild or no HF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10605488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106054882023-10-28 Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients Arakane, Takayuki Okada, Masahiro Nakazawa, Yujiro Tago, Kenichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroki Mizuno, Mariko Abe, Hayato Higaki, Tokio Okamura, Yukiyasu Takayama, Tadatoshi Diagnostics (Basel) Article Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, such as slow diffusion-coefficient related to molecular diffusion (D), fast diffusion-coefficient related to perfusion in microvessels (D*), apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC), and perfusion related diffusion-fraction (f), were calculated by two observers (R1/R2). D (p = 0.718 for R1, p = 0.087 for R2) and D* (p = 0.513, p = 0.708, respectively) showed a poor correlation with HF. ADC (p = 0.034, p = 0.528, respectively) and f (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively) decreased as HF progressed, whereas SV/BSA increased (p = 0.015 for R1). The AUCs of SV/BSA (0.649–0.698 for R1) were higher than those of f (0.575–0.683 for R1 + R2) for severe HF (≥F3–4 and ≥F4), although AUCs of f (0.705–0.790 for R1 + R2) were higher than those of SV/BSA (0.628 for R1) for mild or no HF (≤F0–1). No significant differences to identify HF were observed between IVIM and SV/BSA. SV/BSA allows a higher estimation for evaluating severe HF than IVIM. IVIM is more suitable than SV/BSA for the assessment of mild or no HF. MDPI 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10605488/ /pubmed/37892021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203200 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arakane, Takayuki Okada, Masahiro Nakazawa, Yujiro Tago, Kenichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroki Mizuno, Mariko Abe, Hayato Higaki, Tokio Okamura, Yukiyasu Takayama, Tadatoshi Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients |
title | Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients |
title_full | Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients |
title_short | Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients |
title_sort | comparison between intravoxel incoherent motion and splenic volumetry to predict hepatic fibrosis staging in preoperative patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arakanetakayuki comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT okadamasahiro comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT nakazawayujiro comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT tagokenichiro comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT yoshikawahiroki comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT mizunomariko comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT abehayato comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT higakitokio comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT okamurayukiyasu comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients AT takayamatadatoshi comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients |