Cargando…

Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arakane, Takayuki, Okada, Masahiro, Nakazawa, Yujiro, Tago, Kenichiro, Yoshikawa, Hiroki, Mizuno, Mariko, Abe, Hayato, Higaki, Tokio, Okamura, Yukiyasu, Takayama, Tadatoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203200
_version_ 1785127086468366336
author Arakane, Takayuki
Okada, Masahiro
Nakazawa, Yujiro
Tago, Kenichiro
Yoshikawa, Hiroki
Mizuno, Mariko
Abe, Hayato
Higaki, Tokio
Okamura, Yukiyasu
Takayama, Tadatoshi
author_facet Arakane, Takayuki
Okada, Masahiro
Nakazawa, Yujiro
Tago, Kenichiro
Yoshikawa, Hiroki
Mizuno, Mariko
Abe, Hayato
Higaki, Tokio
Okamura, Yukiyasu
Takayama, Tadatoshi
author_sort Arakane, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, such as slow diffusion-coefficient related to molecular diffusion (D), fast diffusion-coefficient related to perfusion in microvessels (D*), apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC), and perfusion related diffusion-fraction (f), were calculated by two observers (R1/R2). D (p = 0.718 for R1, p = 0.087 for R2) and D* (p = 0.513, p = 0.708, respectively) showed a poor correlation with HF. ADC (p = 0.034, p = 0.528, respectively) and f (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively) decreased as HF progressed, whereas SV/BSA increased (p = 0.015 for R1). The AUCs of SV/BSA (0.649–0.698 for R1) were higher than those of f (0.575–0.683 for R1 + R2) for severe HF (≥F3–4 and ≥F4), although AUCs of f (0.705–0.790 for R1 + R2) were higher than those of SV/BSA (0.628 for R1) for mild or no HF (≤F0–1). No significant differences to identify HF were observed between IVIM and SV/BSA. SV/BSA allows a higher estimation for evaluating severe HF than IVIM. IVIM is more suitable than SV/BSA for the assessment of mild or no HF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106054882023-10-28 Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients Arakane, Takayuki Okada, Masahiro Nakazawa, Yujiro Tago, Kenichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroki Mizuno, Mariko Abe, Hayato Higaki, Tokio Okamura, Yukiyasu Takayama, Tadatoshi Diagnostics (Basel) Article Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, such as slow diffusion-coefficient related to molecular diffusion (D), fast diffusion-coefficient related to perfusion in microvessels (D*), apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC), and perfusion related diffusion-fraction (f), were calculated by two observers (R1/R2). D (p = 0.718 for R1, p = 0.087 for R2) and D* (p = 0.513, p = 0.708, respectively) showed a poor correlation with HF. ADC (p = 0.034, p = 0.528, respectively) and f (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively) decreased as HF progressed, whereas SV/BSA increased (p = 0.015 for R1). The AUCs of SV/BSA (0.649–0.698 for R1) were higher than those of f (0.575–0.683 for R1 + R2) for severe HF (≥F3–4 and ≥F4), although AUCs of f (0.705–0.790 for R1 + R2) were higher than those of SV/BSA (0.628 for R1) for mild or no HF (≤F0–1). No significant differences to identify HF were observed between IVIM and SV/BSA. SV/BSA allows a higher estimation for evaluating severe HF than IVIM. IVIM is more suitable than SV/BSA for the assessment of mild or no HF. MDPI 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10605488/ /pubmed/37892021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203200 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Arakane, Takayuki
Okada, Masahiro
Nakazawa, Yujiro
Tago, Kenichiro
Yoshikawa, Hiroki
Mizuno, Mariko
Abe, Hayato
Higaki, Tokio
Okamura, Yukiyasu
Takayama, Tadatoshi
Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
title Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
title_full Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
title_fullStr Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
title_short Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients
title_sort comparison between intravoxel incoherent motion and splenic volumetry to predict hepatic fibrosis staging in preoperative patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203200
work_keys_str_mv AT arakanetakayuki comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT okadamasahiro comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT nakazawayujiro comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT tagokenichiro comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT yoshikawahiroki comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT mizunomariko comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT abehayato comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT higakitokio comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT okamurayukiyasu comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients
AT takayamatadatoshi comparisonbetweenintravoxelincoherentmotionandsplenicvolumetrytopredicthepaticfibrosisstaginginpreoperativepatients