Cargando…
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systemic inflammatory markers are useful methods to predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients after surgeries. The Naples prognostic score is a useful predictive scoring system that reflects a patient’s inflammatory and nutritional status. In this study, the postoperative N...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15205098 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systemic inflammatory markers are useful methods to predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients after surgeries. The Naples prognostic score is a useful predictive scoring system that reflects a patient’s inflammatory and nutritional status. In this study, the postoperative Naples prognostic score showed high accuracy in predicting survival after curative resection in stage II–III colorectal cancer patients compared with preoperative inflammatory markers. ABSTRACT: Background: The Naples prognostic score (NPS) is a scoring system that reflects a patient’s systemic inflammatory and nutritional status. This study aimed to evaluate whether postoperative NPS is effective in assessing the prognosis of stage II–III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients compared with preoperative NPS. Methods: Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 164 patients diagnosed with stage II–III CRC, who underwent curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, were divided into two groups: Group 0–1 (NPS = 0–2) and Group 2 (NPS = 3 or 4). Preoperative NPS was calculated based on the results before surgeries, and postoperative NPS was assessed using the results obtained before adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The overall survival of Group 0–1 was higher than that of Group 2 in both pre- and postoperative NPS assessments. According to the ROC curve analysis, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) ratio for postoperative NPS was 0.64, compared with 0.57 for preoperative NPS, 0.52 for the preoperative neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.032), and 0.51 for the preoperative platelet–lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.027). Conclusions: Postoperative NPS is effective in predicting the prognosis of stage II–III CRC patients who underwent curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of NPS could be beneficial in evaluating the prognosis of CRC patients after surgeries. |
---|