Cargando…
Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101443 |
_version_ | 1785127101499703296 |
---|---|
author | Abbatantuono, Chiara Alfeo, Federica Clemente, Livio Lancioni, Giulio De Caro, Maria Fara Livrea, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo |
author_facet | Abbatantuono, Chiara Alfeo, Federica Clemente, Livio Lancioni, Giulio De Caro, Maria Fara Livrea, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo |
author_sort | Abbatantuono, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute to understanding the conversion from an asymptomatic stage to a very mild one, eventually leading to obvious disease. The present review examines different diagnostic approaches in view of neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence of NCD progression, which may be subdivided into: (1) preclinical stage; (2) transitional stage; (3) prodromal or mild stage; (4) major NCD. The absence of univocal criteria and the adoption of ambiguous or narrow labels might complicate the diagnostic process. In particular, it should be noted that: (1) only neuropathological hallmarks characterize preclinical NCD; (2) transitional NCD must be assessed through proactive neuropsychological protocols; (3) prodromal/mild NCDs are based on cognitive functional indicators; (4) major NCD requires well-established tools to evaluate its severity stage; (5) insight should be accounted for by both patient and informants. Therefore, the examination of evolving epidemiological and clinical features occurring at each NCD stage may orient primary and secondary care, allowing for more targeted prevention, diagnosis, and/or treatment of both cognitive and functional impairment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10605551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106055512023-10-28 Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care Abbatantuono, Chiara Alfeo, Federica Clemente, Livio Lancioni, Giulio De Caro, Maria Fara Livrea, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo Brain Sci Review Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute to understanding the conversion from an asymptomatic stage to a very mild one, eventually leading to obvious disease. The present review examines different diagnostic approaches in view of neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence of NCD progression, which may be subdivided into: (1) preclinical stage; (2) transitional stage; (3) prodromal or mild stage; (4) major NCD. The absence of univocal criteria and the adoption of ambiguous or narrow labels might complicate the diagnostic process. In particular, it should be noted that: (1) only neuropathological hallmarks characterize preclinical NCD; (2) transitional NCD must be assessed through proactive neuropsychological protocols; (3) prodromal/mild NCDs are based on cognitive functional indicators; (4) major NCD requires well-established tools to evaluate its severity stage; (5) insight should be accounted for by both patient and informants. Therefore, the examination of evolving epidemiological and clinical features occurring at each NCD stage may orient primary and secondary care, allowing for more targeted prevention, diagnosis, and/or treatment of both cognitive and functional impairment. MDPI 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10605551/ /pubmed/37891810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101443 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Abbatantuono, Chiara Alfeo, Federica Clemente, Livio Lancioni, Giulio De Caro, Maria Fara Livrea, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care |
title | Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care |
title_full | Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care |
title_fullStr | Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care |
title_short | Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care |
title_sort | current challenges in the diagnosis of progressive neurocognitive disorders: a critical review of the literature and recommendations for primary and secondary care |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abbatantuonochiara currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare AT alfeofederica currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare AT clementelivio currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare AT lancionigiulio currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare AT decaromariafara currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare AT livreapaolo currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare AT taurisanopaolo currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare |