Cargando…

Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care

Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbatantuono, Chiara, Alfeo, Federica, Clemente, Livio, Lancioni, Giulio, De Caro, Maria Fara, Livrea, Paolo, Taurisano, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101443
_version_ 1785127101499703296
author Abbatantuono, Chiara
Alfeo, Federica
Clemente, Livio
Lancioni, Giulio
De Caro, Maria Fara
Livrea, Paolo
Taurisano, Paolo
author_facet Abbatantuono, Chiara
Alfeo, Federica
Clemente, Livio
Lancioni, Giulio
De Caro, Maria Fara
Livrea, Paolo
Taurisano, Paolo
author_sort Abbatantuono, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute to understanding the conversion from an asymptomatic stage to a very mild one, eventually leading to obvious disease. The present review examines different diagnostic approaches in view of neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence of NCD progression, which may be subdivided into: (1) preclinical stage; (2) transitional stage; (3) prodromal or mild stage; (4) major NCD. The absence of univocal criteria and the adoption of ambiguous or narrow labels might complicate the diagnostic process. In particular, it should be noted that: (1) only neuropathological hallmarks characterize preclinical NCD; (2) transitional NCD must be assessed through proactive neuropsychological protocols; (3) prodromal/mild NCDs are based on cognitive functional indicators; (4) major NCD requires well-established tools to evaluate its severity stage; (5) insight should be accounted for by both patient and informants. Therefore, the examination of evolving epidemiological and clinical features occurring at each NCD stage may orient primary and secondary care, allowing for more targeted prevention, diagnosis, and/or treatment of both cognitive and functional impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106055512023-10-28 Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care Abbatantuono, Chiara Alfeo, Federica Clemente, Livio Lancioni, Giulio De Caro, Maria Fara Livrea, Paolo Taurisano, Paolo Brain Sci Review Screening for early symptoms of cognitive impairment enables timely interventions for patients and their families. Despite the advances in dementia diagnosis, the current nosography of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) seems to overlook some clinical manifestations and predictors that could contribute to understanding the conversion from an asymptomatic stage to a very mild one, eventually leading to obvious disease. The present review examines different diagnostic approaches in view of neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence of NCD progression, which may be subdivided into: (1) preclinical stage; (2) transitional stage; (3) prodromal or mild stage; (4) major NCD. The absence of univocal criteria and the adoption of ambiguous or narrow labels might complicate the diagnostic process. In particular, it should be noted that: (1) only neuropathological hallmarks characterize preclinical NCD; (2) transitional NCD must be assessed through proactive neuropsychological protocols; (3) prodromal/mild NCDs are based on cognitive functional indicators; (4) major NCD requires well-established tools to evaluate its severity stage; (5) insight should be accounted for by both patient and informants. Therefore, the examination of evolving epidemiological and clinical features occurring at each NCD stage may orient primary and secondary care, allowing for more targeted prevention, diagnosis, and/or treatment of both cognitive and functional impairment. MDPI 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10605551/ /pubmed/37891810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101443 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Abbatantuono, Chiara
Alfeo, Federica
Clemente, Livio
Lancioni, Giulio
De Caro, Maria Fara
Livrea, Paolo
Taurisano, Paolo
Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
title Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
title_full Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
title_fullStr Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
title_full_unstemmed Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
title_short Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care
title_sort current challenges in the diagnosis of progressive neurocognitive disorders: a critical review of the literature and recommendations for primary and secondary care
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37891810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13101443
work_keys_str_mv AT abbatantuonochiara currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare
AT alfeofederica currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare
AT clementelivio currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare
AT lancionigiulio currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare
AT decaromariafara currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare
AT livreapaolo currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare
AT taurisanopaolo currentchallengesinthediagnosisofprogressiveneurocognitivedisordersacriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforprimaryandsecondarycare