Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review

All societies should carefully address the child abuse and neglect phenomenon due to its acute and chronic sequelae. Even if artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in this field could be helpful, the state of the art of this implementation is not known. No studies have comprehensively reviewed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupariello, Francesco, Sussetto, Luca, Di Trani, Sara, Di Vella, Giancarlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10101659
_version_ 1785127140022288384
author Lupariello, Francesco
Sussetto, Luca
Di Trani, Sara
Di Vella, Giancarlo
author_facet Lupariello, Francesco
Sussetto, Luca
Di Trani, Sara
Di Vella, Giancarlo
author_sort Lupariello, Francesco
collection PubMed
description All societies should carefully address the child abuse and neglect phenomenon due to its acute and chronic sequelae. Even if artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in this field could be helpful, the state of the art of this implementation is not known. No studies have comprehensively reviewed the types of AI models that have been developed/validated. Furthermore, no indications about the risk of bias in these studies are available. For these reasons, the authors conducted a systematic review of the PubMed database to answer the following questions: “what is the state of the art about the development and/or validation of AI predictive models useful to contrast child abuse and neglect phenomenon?”; “which is the risk of bias of the included articles?”. The inclusion criteria were: articles written in English and dated from January 1985 to 31 March 2023; publications that used a medical and/or protective service dataset to develop and/or validate AI prediction models. The reviewers screened 413 articles. Among them, seven papers were included. Their analysis showed that: the types of input data were heterogeneous; artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, and natural language processing were used; the datasets had a median size of 2600 cases; the risk of bias was high for all studies. The results of the review pointed out that the implementation of AI in the child abuse and neglect field lagged compared to other medical fields. Furthermore, the evaluation of the risk of bias suggested that future studies should provide an appropriate choice of sample size, validation, and management of overfitting, optimism, and missing data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10605696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106056962023-10-28 Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review Lupariello, Francesco Sussetto, Luca Di Trani, Sara Di Vella, Giancarlo Children (Basel) Review All societies should carefully address the child abuse and neglect phenomenon due to its acute and chronic sequelae. Even if artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in this field could be helpful, the state of the art of this implementation is not known. No studies have comprehensively reviewed the types of AI models that have been developed/validated. Furthermore, no indications about the risk of bias in these studies are available. For these reasons, the authors conducted a systematic review of the PubMed database to answer the following questions: “what is the state of the art about the development and/or validation of AI predictive models useful to contrast child abuse and neglect phenomenon?”; “which is the risk of bias of the included articles?”. The inclusion criteria were: articles written in English and dated from January 1985 to 31 March 2023; publications that used a medical and/or protective service dataset to develop and/or validate AI prediction models. The reviewers screened 413 articles. Among them, seven papers were included. Their analysis showed that: the types of input data were heterogeneous; artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, and natural language processing were used; the datasets had a median size of 2600 cases; the risk of bias was high for all studies. The results of the review pointed out that the implementation of AI in the child abuse and neglect field lagged compared to other medical fields. Furthermore, the evaluation of the risk of bias suggested that future studies should provide an appropriate choice of sample size, validation, and management of overfitting, optimism, and missing data. MDPI 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10605696/ /pubmed/37892322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10101659 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lupariello, Francesco
Sussetto, Luca
Di Trani, Sara
Di Vella, Giancarlo
Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review
title Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review
title_full Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review
title_short Artificial Intelligence and Child Abuse and Neglect: A Systematic Review
title_sort artificial intelligence and child abuse and neglect: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10101659
work_keys_str_mv AT lupariellofrancesco artificialintelligenceandchildabuseandneglectasystematicreview
AT sussettoluca artificialintelligenceandchildabuseandneglectasystematicreview
AT ditranisara artificialintelligenceandchildabuseandneglectasystematicreview
AT divellagiancarlo artificialintelligenceandchildabuseandneglectasystematicreview