Cargando…
Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors
[(18)F]FDG PET/CT is used in the workup of indeterminate soft tissue tumors (STTs) but lacks accuracy in the detection of malignant STTs. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether dual-time point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging (DTPI) can be useful in this indication. In this prospective study, [(18)F]...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203202 |
_version_ | 1785127242469212160 |
---|---|
author | d’Abadie, Philippe Gheysens, Olivier Lhommel, Renaud Jamar, François Kirchgesner, Thomas Mazzeo, Filomena Coubeau, Laurent Yildiz, Halil De Roo, An-Katrien Schubert, Thomas |
author_facet | d’Abadie, Philippe Gheysens, Olivier Lhommel, Renaud Jamar, François Kirchgesner, Thomas Mazzeo, Filomena Coubeau, Laurent Yildiz, Halil De Roo, An-Katrien Schubert, Thomas |
author_sort | d’Abadie, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | [(18)F]FDG PET/CT is used in the workup of indeterminate soft tissue tumors (STTs) but lacks accuracy in the detection of malignant STTs. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether dual-time point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging (DTPI) can be useful in this indication. In this prospective study, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 1 h (t1) and 3 h (t2) after injection. Tumor uptake (SUVmax) was calculated at each time point to define a retention index (RI) corresponding to the variation between t1 and t2 (%). Sixty-eight patients were included, representing 20 benign and 48 malignant tumors (including 40 sarcomas). The RI was significantly higher in malignant STTs than in benign STTs (median: +21.8% vs. −2%, p < 0.001). An RI of >14.3% predicted STT malignancy with a specificity (Sp) of 90% and a sensitivity (Se) of 69%. An SUVmax(t1) of >4.5 was less accurate with an Sp of 80% and an Se of 60%. In a subgroup of tumors with at least mild [(18)F]FDG uptake (SUVmax ≥ 3; n = 46), the RI significantly outperformed the diagnostic accuracy of SUVmax (AUC: 0.88 vs. 0.68, p = 0.01). DTPI identifies malignant STT tumors with high specificity and outperforms the diagnostic accuracy of standard PET/CT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10606132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106061322023-10-28 Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors d’Abadie, Philippe Gheysens, Olivier Lhommel, Renaud Jamar, François Kirchgesner, Thomas Mazzeo, Filomena Coubeau, Laurent Yildiz, Halil De Roo, An-Katrien Schubert, Thomas Diagnostics (Basel) Article [(18)F]FDG PET/CT is used in the workup of indeterminate soft tissue tumors (STTs) but lacks accuracy in the detection of malignant STTs. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether dual-time point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging (DTPI) can be useful in this indication. In this prospective study, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 1 h (t1) and 3 h (t2) after injection. Tumor uptake (SUVmax) was calculated at each time point to define a retention index (RI) corresponding to the variation between t1 and t2 (%). Sixty-eight patients were included, representing 20 benign and 48 malignant tumors (including 40 sarcomas). The RI was significantly higher in malignant STTs than in benign STTs (median: +21.8% vs. −2%, p < 0.001). An RI of >14.3% predicted STT malignancy with a specificity (Sp) of 90% and a sensitivity (Se) of 69%. An SUVmax(t1) of >4.5 was less accurate with an Sp of 80% and an Se of 60%. In a subgroup of tumors with at least mild [(18)F]FDG uptake (SUVmax ≥ 3; n = 46), the RI significantly outperformed the diagnostic accuracy of SUVmax (AUC: 0.88 vs. 0.68, p = 0.01). DTPI identifies malignant STT tumors with high specificity and outperforms the diagnostic accuracy of standard PET/CT. MDPI 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10606132/ /pubmed/37892023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203202 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article d’Abadie, Philippe Gheysens, Olivier Lhommel, Renaud Jamar, François Kirchgesner, Thomas Mazzeo, Filomena Coubeau, Laurent Yildiz, Halil De Roo, An-Katrien Schubert, Thomas Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors |
title | Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors |
title_full | Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors |
title_short | Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [(18)F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors |
title_sort | diagnostic superiority of dual-time point [(18)f]fdg pet/ct to differentiate malignant from benign soft tissue tumors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dabadiephilippe diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT gheysensolivier diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT lhommelrenaud diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT jamarfrancois diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT kirchgesnerthomas diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT mazzeofilomena diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT coubeaulaurent diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT yildizhalil diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT derooankatrien diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors AT schubertthomas diagnosticsuperiorityofdualtimepoint18ffdgpetcttodifferentiatemalignantfrombenignsofttissuetumors |