Cargando…
Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on electronic reading (e-reading) versus paper reading. The main objective was to assess the current state of research comparing digital and paper reading outcomes among students aged 6–18 years old, as well as assessing the impact of vari...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142 |
_version_ | 1785127266793029632 |
---|---|
author | Peras, Igor Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva Japelj Pavešić, Barbara Mekiš Recek, Žiga |
author_facet | Peras, Igor Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva Japelj Pavešić, Barbara Mekiš Recek, Žiga |
author_sort | Peras, Igor |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on electronic reading (e-reading) versus paper reading. The main objective was to assess the current state of research comparing digital and paper reading outcomes among students aged 6–18 years old, as well as assessing the impact of various factors (gender, socioeconomic status, and school location) in explaining the differences between the two modes. Inclusion criteria included the following: participants (6–18 years), research focus (comparing digital reading and paper reading), study type (quantitative or mixed methods), publication (peer reviewed between 2015 and 2022), and language (English). A systematic search in four databases (WOS, Scopus, ERIC, and JSTOR) in August 2022 was conducted by three reviewers. The search revealed 23 studies matching the inclusion criteria. The findings from the reviewed studies are diverse, with some reporting no significant differences in reading comprehension between the two modes, while others suggest screen inferiority, thereby favoring paper reading. Individual-level predictors, such as prior comprehension skills and reading habits, play a crucial role in determining reading performance across modes. Family-level factors, such as the number of books at home, and school-level factors, like the usage of ICT resources, influence both paper and digital reading comprehension. Moreover, gender differences in attitudes and performance towards different reading modes are apparent. SES is positively associated with reading achievement in both modes, with a larger effect shown for paper reading. Overall, the comparison between electronic and paper reading modes reveals a complex interplay of individual and contextual factors influencing reading comprehension and attitudes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10606230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106062302023-10-28 Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality Peras, Igor Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva Japelj Pavešić, Barbara Mekiš Recek, Žiga Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ Review This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on electronic reading (e-reading) versus paper reading. The main objective was to assess the current state of research comparing digital and paper reading outcomes among students aged 6–18 years old, as well as assessing the impact of various factors (gender, socioeconomic status, and school location) in explaining the differences between the two modes. Inclusion criteria included the following: participants (6–18 years), research focus (comparing digital reading and paper reading), study type (quantitative or mixed methods), publication (peer reviewed between 2015 and 2022), and language (English). A systematic search in four databases (WOS, Scopus, ERIC, and JSTOR) in August 2022 was conducted by three reviewers. The search revealed 23 studies matching the inclusion criteria. The findings from the reviewed studies are diverse, with some reporting no significant differences in reading comprehension between the two modes, while others suggest screen inferiority, thereby favoring paper reading. Individual-level predictors, such as prior comprehension skills and reading habits, play a crucial role in determining reading performance across modes. Family-level factors, such as the number of books at home, and school-level factors, like the usage of ICT resources, influence both paper and digital reading comprehension. Moreover, gender differences in attitudes and performance towards different reading modes are apparent. SES is positively associated with reading achievement in both modes, with a larger effect shown for paper reading. Overall, the comparison between electronic and paper reading modes reveals a complex interplay of individual and contextual factors influencing reading comprehension and attitudes. MDPI 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10606230/ /pubmed/37887143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Peras, Igor Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva Japelj Pavešić, Barbara Mekiš Recek, Žiga Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality |
title | Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality |
title_full | Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality |
title_fullStr | Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality |
title_short | Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality |
title_sort | digital versus paper reading: a systematic literature review on contemporary gaps according to gender, socioeconomic status, and rurality |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perasigor digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality AT klemencicmirazchiyskieva digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality AT japeljpavesicbarbara digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality AT mekisrecekziga digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality |