Cargando…

Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on electronic reading (e-reading) versus paper reading. The main objective was to assess the current state of research comparing digital and paper reading outcomes among students aged 6–18 years old, as well as assessing the impact of vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peras, Igor, Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva, Japelj Pavešić, Barbara, Mekiš Recek, Žiga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142
_version_ 1785127266793029632
author Peras, Igor
Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva
Japelj Pavešić, Barbara
Mekiš Recek, Žiga
author_facet Peras, Igor
Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva
Japelj Pavešić, Barbara
Mekiš Recek, Žiga
author_sort Peras, Igor
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on electronic reading (e-reading) versus paper reading. The main objective was to assess the current state of research comparing digital and paper reading outcomes among students aged 6–18 years old, as well as assessing the impact of various factors (gender, socioeconomic status, and school location) in explaining the differences between the two modes. Inclusion criteria included the following: participants (6–18 years), research focus (comparing digital reading and paper reading), study type (quantitative or mixed methods), publication (peer reviewed between 2015 and 2022), and language (English). A systematic search in four databases (WOS, Scopus, ERIC, and JSTOR) in August 2022 was conducted by three reviewers. The search revealed 23 studies matching the inclusion criteria. The findings from the reviewed studies are diverse, with some reporting no significant differences in reading comprehension between the two modes, while others suggest screen inferiority, thereby favoring paper reading. Individual-level predictors, such as prior comprehension skills and reading habits, play a crucial role in determining reading performance across modes. Family-level factors, such as the number of books at home, and school-level factors, like the usage of ICT resources, influence both paper and digital reading comprehension. Moreover, gender differences in attitudes and performance towards different reading modes are apparent. SES is positively associated with reading achievement in both modes, with a larger effect shown for paper reading. Overall, the comparison between electronic and paper reading modes reveals a complex interplay of individual and contextual factors influencing reading comprehension and attitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106062302023-10-28 Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality Peras, Igor Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva Japelj Pavešić, Barbara Mekiš Recek, Žiga Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ Review This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature on electronic reading (e-reading) versus paper reading. The main objective was to assess the current state of research comparing digital and paper reading outcomes among students aged 6–18 years old, as well as assessing the impact of various factors (gender, socioeconomic status, and school location) in explaining the differences between the two modes. Inclusion criteria included the following: participants (6–18 years), research focus (comparing digital reading and paper reading), study type (quantitative or mixed methods), publication (peer reviewed between 2015 and 2022), and language (English). A systematic search in four databases (WOS, Scopus, ERIC, and JSTOR) in August 2022 was conducted by three reviewers. The search revealed 23 studies matching the inclusion criteria. The findings from the reviewed studies are diverse, with some reporting no significant differences in reading comprehension between the two modes, while others suggest screen inferiority, thereby favoring paper reading. Individual-level predictors, such as prior comprehension skills and reading habits, play a crucial role in determining reading performance across modes. Family-level factors, such as the number of books at home, and school-level factors, like the usage of ICT resources, influence both paper and digital reading comprehension. Moreover, gender differences in attitudes and performance towards different reading modes are apparent. SES is positively associated with reading achievement in both modes, with a larger effect shown for paper reading. Overall, the comparison between electronic and paper reading modes reveals a complex interplay of individual and contextual factors influencing reading comprehension and attitudes. MDPI 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10606230/ /pubmed/37887143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Peras, Igor
Klemenčič Mirazchiyski, Eva
Japelj Pavešić, Barbara
Mekiš Recek, Žiga
Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
title Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
title_full Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
title_fullStr Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
title_full_unstemmed Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
title_short Digital versus Paper Reading: A Systematic Literature Review on Contemporary Gaps According to Gender, Socioeconomic Status, and Rurality
title_sort digital versus paper reading: a systematic literature review on contemporary gaps according to gender, socioeconomic status, and rurality
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100142
work_keys_str_mv AT perasigor digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality
AT klemencicmirazchiyskieva digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality
AT japeljpavesicbarbara digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality
AT mekisrecekziga digitalversuspaperreadingasystematicliteraturereviewoncontemporarygapsaccordingtogendersocioeconomicstatusandrurality