Cargando…

Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre

Advanced pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, often less than 1 year. Honest prognosis discussions guide early community palliative care services input, facilitating timely advance care planning and improving quality of life. The aims were to assess if patients were offered prognos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clelland, Sarah, Nuttall, Christina L., Stott, Helen E., Cope, Joseph, Barratt, Natalie L., Farrell, Kelly, Eyong, Manyi V., Gleeson, Jack P., Lamarca, Angela, Hubner, Richard A., Valle, Juan W., McNamara, Mairéad G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893876
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202802
_version_ 1785127297455489024
author Clelland, Sarah
Nuttall, Christina L.
Stott, Helen E.
Cope, Joseph
Barratt, Natalie L.
Farrell, Kelly
Eyong, Manyi V.
Gleeson, Jack P.
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
McNamara, Mairéad G.
author_facet Clelland, Sarah
Nuttall, Christina L.
Stott, Helen E.
Cope, Joseph
Barratt, Natalie L.
Farrell, Kelly
Eyong, Manyi V.
Gleeson, Jack P.
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
McNamara, Mairéad G.
author_sort Clelland, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Advanced pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, often less than 1 year. Honest prognosis discussions guide early community palliative care services input, facilitating timely advance care planning and improving quality of life. The aims were to assess if patients were offered prognosis discussions and community palliative care services referral. A retrospective analysis of consecutive case-notes of new advanced pancreatic cancer patients was conducted. Chi-squared test assessed the association with prognosis discussion and community palliative care services referral. In total, 365 cases (60%) had a documented prognosis discussion at any time-point in the treatment pathway; 54.4% during the first appointment. The frequency of prognosis discussion was greater with nurse clinician review at first appointment (p < 0.001). In total, 171 patients (28.1%) were known to community palliative care services at the first appointment. Of those not known, 171 (39.1%) and 143 (32.7%) were referred at this initial time-point or later, respectively. There was a significant association between the referral to community palliative care services at first appointment and the reviewing professional (this was greatest for nurse clinicians (frequency 65.2%)) (p < 0.001), and also if reviewed by clinical nurse specialist at first visit or not (47.8% vs. 35.6%) (p < 0.01). Prognosis discussions were documented in approximately two-thirds of cases, highlighting missed opportunities. Prognosis discussion was associated with clinician review and was most frequent for nurse clinician, as was referral to community palliative care services. Clinical nurse specialist review increased referral to community palliative care services if seen at the initial visit. Multi-disciplinary review, specifically nursing, therefore, during the first consultation is imperative and additive. It should be considered best practice to offer and negotiate the content and timing of prognosis discussions with cancer patients, and revisit this offer throughout their treatment pathway. Greater attention to prognosis discussion documentation is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106063592023-10-28 Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre Clelland, Sarah Nuttall, Christina L. Stott, Helen E. Cope, Joseph Barratt, Natalie L. Farrell, Kelly Eyong, Manyi V. Gleeson, Jack P. Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. McNamara, Mairéad G. Healthcare (Basel) Article Advanced pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, often less than 1 year. Honest prognosis discussions guide early community palliative care services input, facilitating timely advance care planning and improving quality of life. The aims were to assess if patients were offered prognosis discussions and community palliative care services referral. A retrospective analysis of consecutive case-notes of new advanced pancreatic cancer patients was conducted. Chi-squared test assessed the association with prognosis discussion and community palliative care services referral. In total, 365 cases (60%) had a documented prognosis discussion at any time-point in the treatment pathway; 54.4% during the first appointment. The frequency of prognosis discussion was greater with nurse clinician review at first appointment (p < 0.001). In total, 171 patients (28.1%) were known to community palliative care services at the first appointment. Of those not known, 171 (39.1%) and 143 (32.7%) were referred at this initial time-point or later, respectively. There was a significant association between the referral to community palliative care services at first appointment and the reviewing professional (this was greatest for nurse clinicians (frequency 65.2%)) (p < 0.001), and also if reviewed by clinical nurse specialist at first visit or not (47.8% vs. 35.6%) (p < 0.01). Prognosis discussions were documented in approximately two-thirds of cases, highlighting missed opportunities. Prognosis discussion was associated with clinician review and was most frequent for nurse clinician, as was referral to community palliative care services. Clinical nurse specialist review increased referral to community palliative care services if seen at the initial visit. Multi-disciplinary review, specifically nursing, therefore, during the first consultation is imperative and additive. It should be considered best practice to offer and negotiate the content and timing of prognosis discussions with cancer patients, and revisit this offer throughout their treatment pathway. Greater attention to prognosis discussion documentation is recommended. MDPI 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10606359/ /pubmed/37893876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202802 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Clelland, Sarah
Nuttall, Christina L.
Stott, Helen E.
Cope, Joseph
Barratt, Natalie L.
Farrell, Kelly
Eyong, Manyi V.
Gleeson, Jack P.
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
McNamara, Mairéad G.
Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre
title Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre
title_full Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre
title_fullStr Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre
title_short Prognosis Discussion and Referral to Community Palliative Care Services in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated in a Tertiary Cancer Centre
title_sort prognosis discussion and referral to community palliative care services in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated in a tertiary cancer centre
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893876
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202802
work_keys_str_mv AT clellandsarah prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT nuttallchristinal prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT stotthelene prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT copejoseph prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT barrattnataliel prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT farrellkelly prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT eyongmanyiv prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT gleesonjackp prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT lamarcaangela prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT hubnerricharda prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT vallejuanw prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre
AT mcnamaramaireadg prognosisdiscussionandreferraltocommunitypalliativecareservicesinpatientswithadvancedpancreaticcancertreatedinatertiarycancercentre