Cargando…

Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?

Since the only and the milestone FDA approval of becaplermin gel (Regranex(TM), 0.01% human recombinant PDGF-BB) as a (diabetic) wound healing therapeutic more than 25 years ago, no new therapeutic (excluding physical therapies, devices, dressings, anti-microbial agents, or other preventive treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Mei, Chang, Cheng, Levian, Brandon, Woodley, David T., Li, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015109
_version_ 1785127320484315136
author Chen, Mei
Chang, Cheng
Levian, Brandon
Woodley, David T.
Li, Wei
author_facet Chen, Mei
Chang, Cheng
Levian, Brandon
Woodley, David T.
Li, Wei
author_sort Chen, Mei
collection PubMed
description Since the only and the milestone FDA approval of becaplermin gel (Regranex(TM), 0.01% human recombinant PDGF-BB) as a (diabetic) wound healing therapeutic more than 25 years ago, no new therapeutic (excluding physical therapies, devices, dressings, anti-microbial agents, or other preventive treatments) for any type of wound healing has advanced to clinical applications. During the same period of time, the FDA has approved additional 250 new drugs for various human tumors, which were famously described as “wounds that do not heal”. Two similar pathological conditions have experienced such a dramatic difference in therapeutics. More surprisingly, few in the wound healing community seem to be alarmed by this mysterious deficit. As it is often said, “damaging is far easier than re-building”. In contrast to the primary duty of a cancer drug to damage a single molecule of the signaling network, a wound healing drug must be able to re-build the multi-level damages in the wound. No known single molecule alone is capable of repairing multi-cell-type and multi-pathway damages all at once. We argue that the previous single molecule-based strategy for developing wound healing therapeutics is profoundly flawed in theory. The future success of effective wound healing therapeutics requires a fundamental change in the paradigm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106064552023-10-28 Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing? Chen, Mei Chang, Cheng Levian, Brandon Woodley, David T. Li, Wei Int J Mol Sci Review Since the only and the milestone FDA approval of becaplermin gel (Regranex(TM), 0.01% human recombinant PDGF-BB) as a (diabetic) wound healing therapeutic more than 25 years ago, no new therapeutic (excluding physical therapies, devices, dressings, anti-microbial agents, or other preventive treatments) for any type of wound healing has advanced to clinical applications. During the same period of time, the FDA has approved additional 250 new drugs for various human tumors, which were famously described as “wounds that do not heal”. Two similar pathological conditions have experienced such a dramatic difference in therapeutics. More surprisingly, few in the wound healing community seem to be alarmed by this mysterious deficit. As it is often said, “damaging is far easier than re-building”. In contrast to the primary duty of a cancer drug to damage a single molecule of the signaling network, a wound healing drug must be able to re-build the multi-level damages in the wound. No known single molecule alone is capable of repairing multi-cell-type and multi-pathway damages all at once. We argue that the previous single molecule-based strategy for developing wound healing therapeutics is profoundly flawed in theory. The future success of effective wound healing therapeutics requires a fundamental change in the paradigm. MDPI 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10606455/ /pubmed/37894789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015109 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Mei
Chang, Cheng
Levian, Brandon
Woodley, David T.
Li, Wei
Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?
title Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?
title_full Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?
title_fullStr Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?
title_full_unstemmed Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?
title_short Why Are There So Few FDA-Approved Therapeutics for Wound Healing?
title_sort why are there so few fda-approved therapeutics for wound healing?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015109
work_keys_str_mv AT chenmei whyaretheresofewfdaapprovedtherapeuticsforwoundhealing
AT changcheng whyaretheresofewfdaapprovedtherapeuticsforwoundhealing
AT levianbrandon whyaretheresofewfdaapprovedtherapeuticsforwoundhealing
AT woodleydavidt whyaretheresofewfdaapprovedtherapeuticsforwoundhealing
AT liwei whyaretheresofewfdaapprovedtherapeuticsforwoundhealing