Cargando…

Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study

Background: Genetic testing may provide information for diagnostic, prognostic and pharmacogenetic purposes. The PREPARE study recently showed that the number of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions could be reduced via genotype-guided treatment. The aim of this work was to assess the relevanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kampik, Lukas, Schirmer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37895207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14101858
_version_ 1785127324115533824
author Kampik, Lukas
Schirmer, Michael
author_facet Kampik, Lukas
Schirmer, Michael
author_sort Kampik, Lukas
collection PubMed
description Background: Genetic testing may provide information for diagnostic, prognostic and pharmacogenetic purposes. The PREPARE study recently showed that the number of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions could be reduced via genotype-guided treatment. The aim of this work was to assess the relevance of genetic testing and its actual use in consecutive rheumatic outpatients. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed with data from a prospectively designed observational project with outpatients consecutively recruited from a university clinic of rheumatology. Results: In this cohort of 2490 patients, the potential need for genetic testing is immense, with 57.3% of patients having the potential to benefit from genetic testing according to their diagnosis and treatment and 53.3% of patients with actually performed genetic testing for diagnostic, prognostic or pharmacogenetic purposes. In detail, patients would potentially benefit from genetic testing especially for therapeutic (28.0%) and diagnostic (26.9%) purposes. Genetic testing was performed for diagnostic purposes in 51.6% of subjects, for pharmacogenetic purposes in 3.7% and for prognostic purposes in 0.1%. The ratio between the number of patients who had had tests performed to those with a potential need for genetic testing decreased with age, from 127.1% for 20 to <30-year-old patients to 46.1% for 80 to <90-year-old patients. Pharmacogenetic testing was only performed for disease-related medications. Conclusions: Genetic testing is frequently needed in patients with rheumatic diseases. The value of pharmacogenetic testing is certainly underestimated, especially in case of medications for comorbidities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106064702023-10-28 Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study Kampik, Lukas Schirmer, Michael Genes (Basel) Article Background: Genetic testing may provide information for diagnostic, prognostic and pharmacogenetic purposes. The PREPARE study recently showed that the number of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions could be reduced via genotype-guided treatment. The aim of this work was to assess the relevance of genetic testing and its actual use in consecutive rheumatic outpatients. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed with data from a prospectively designed observational project with outpatients consecutively recruited from a university clinic of rheumatology. Results: In this cohort of 2490 patients, the potential need for genetic testing is immense, with 57.3% of patients having the potential to benefit from genetic testing according to their diagnosis and treatment and 53.3% of patients with actually performed genetic testing for diagnostic, prognostic or pharmacogenetic purposes. In detail, patients would potentially benefit from genetic testing especially for therapeutic (28.0%) and diagnostic (26.9%) purposes. Genetic testing was performed for diagnostic purposes in 51.6% of subjects, for pharmacogenetic purposes in 3.7% and for prognostic purposes in 0.1%. The ratio between the number of patients who had had tests performed to those with a potential need for genetic testing decreased with age, from 127.1% for 20 to <30-year-old patients to 46.1% for 80 to <90-year-old patients. Pharmacogenetic testing was only performed for disease-related medications. Conclusions: Genetic testing is frequently needed in patients with rheumatic diseases. The value of pharmacogenetic testing is certainly underestimated, especially in case of medications for comorbidities. MDPI 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10606470/ /pubmed/37895207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14101858 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kampik, Lukas
Schirmer, Michael
Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
title Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
title_full Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
title_fullStr Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
title_short Unexpected High Need for Genetic Testing in Rheumatology: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
title_sort unexpected high need for genetic testing in rheumatology: a cross-sectional cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37895207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14101858
work_keys_str_mv AT kampiklukas unexpectedhighneedforgenetictestinginrheumatologyacrosssectionalcohortstudy
AT schirmermichael unexpectedhighneedforgenetictestinginrheumatologyacrosssectionalcohortstudy