Cargando…
Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
There are a variety of methods employed by laboratories for quantifying extracellular vesicles isolated from bacteria. As a result, the ability to compare results across published studies can lead to questions regarding the suitability of methods and buffers for accurately quantifying these vesicles...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015096 |
_version_ | 1785127344130752512 |
---|---|
author | Mosby, Chanel A. Perez Devia, Natalia Jones, Melissa K. |
author_facet | Mosby, Chanel A. Perez Devia, Natalia Jones, Melissa K. |
author_sort | Mosby, Chanel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are a variety of methods employed by laboratories for quantifying extracellular vesicles isolated from bacteria. As a result, the ability to compare results across published studies can lead to questions regarding the suitability of methods and buffers for accurately quantifying these vesicles. Within the literature, there are several common methods for vesicle quantification. These include lipid quantification using the lipophilic dye FM 4-64, protein quantification using microBCA, Qubit, and NanoOrange assays, or direct vesicle enumeration using nanoparticle tracking analysis. In addition, various diluents and lysis buffers are also used to resuspend and treat vesicles. In this study, we directly compared the quantification of a bacterial outer membrane vesicle using several commonly used methods. We also tested the impact of different buffers, buffer age, lysis method, and vesicle diluent on vesicle quantification. The results showed that buffer age had no significant effect on vesicle quantification, but the lysis method impacted the reliability of measurements using Qubit and NanoOrange. The microBCA assay displayed the least variability in protein concentration values and was the most consistent, regardless of the buffer or diluent used. MicroBCA also demonstrated the strongest correlation to the NTA-determined particle number across a range of vesicle concentrations. Overall, these results indicate that with appropriate diluent and buffer choice, microBCA vs. NTA standard curves could be generated and the microBCA assay used to estimate the particle number when NTA instrumentation is not readily available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10606555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106065552023-10-28 Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria Mosby, Chanel A. Perez Devia, Natalia Jones, Melissa K. Int J Mol Sci Article There are a variety of methods employed by laboratories for quantifying extracellular vesicles isolated from bacteria. As a result, the ability to compare results across published studies can lead to questions regarding the suitability of methods and buffers for accurately quantifying these vesicles. Within the literature, there are several common methods for vesicle quantification. These include lipid quantification using the lipophilic dye FM 4-64, protein quantification using microBCA, Qubit, and NanoOrange assays, or direct vesicle enumeration using nanoparticle tracking analysis. In addition, various diluents and lysis buffers are also used to resuspend and treat vesicles. In this study, we directly compared the quantification of a bacterial outer membrane vesicle using several commonly used methods. We also tested the impact of different buffers, buffer age, lysis method, and vesicle diluent on vesicle quantification. The results showed that buffer age had no significant effect on vesicle quantification, but the lysis method impacted the reliability of measurements using Qubit and NanoOrange. The microBCA assay displayed the least variability in protein concentration values and was the most consistent, regardless of the buffer or diluent used. MicroBCA also demonstrated the strongest correlation to the NTA-determined particle number across a range of vesicle concentrations. Overall, these results indicate that with appropriate diluent and buffer choice, microBCA vs. NTA standard curves could be generated and the microBCA assay used to estimate the particle number when NTA instrumentation is not readily available. MDPI 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10606555/ /pubmed/37894776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015096 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mosby, Chanel A. Perez Devia, Natalia Jones, Melissa K. Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria |
title | Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria |
title_full | Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria |
title_short | Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria |
title_sort | comparison of methods for quantifying extracellular vesicles of gram-negative bacteria |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mosbychanela comparisonofmethodsforquantifyingextracellularvesiclesofgramnegativebacteria AT perezdevianatalia comparisonofmethodsforquantifyingextracellularvesiclesofgramnegativebacteria AT jonesmelissak comparisonofmethodsforquantifyingextracellularvesiclesofgramnegativebacteria |