Cargando…

Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria

There are a variety of methods employed by laboratories for quantifying extracellular vesicles isolated from bacteria. As a result, the ability to compare results across published studies can lead to questions regarding the suitability of methods and buffers for accurately quantifying these vesicles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosby, Chanel A., Perez Devia, Natalia, Jones, Melissa K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015096
_version_ 1785127344130752512
author Mosby, Chanel A.
Perez Devia, Natalia
Jones, Melissa K.
author_facet Mosby, Chanel A.
Perez Devia, Natalia
Jones, Melissa K.
author_sort Mosby, Chanel A.
collection PubMed
description There are a variety of methods employed by laboratories for quantifying extracellular vesicles isolated from bacteria. As a result, the ability to compare results across published studies can lead to questions regarding the suitability of methods and buffers for accurately quantifying these vesicles. Within the literature, there are several common methods for vesicle quantification. These include lipid quantification using the lipophilic dye FM 4-64, protein quantification using microBCA, Qubit, and NanoOrange assays, or direct vesicle enumeration using nanoparticle tracking analysis. In addition, various diluents and lysis buffers are also used to resuspend and treat vesicles. In this study, we directly compared the quantification of a bacterial outer membrane vesicle using several commonly used methods. We also tested the impact of different buffers, buffer age, lysis method, and vesicle diluent on vesicle quantification. The results showed that buffer age had no significant effect on vesicle quantification, but the lysis method impacted the reliability of measurements using Qubit and NanoOrange. The microBCA assay displayed the least variability in protein concentration values and was the most consistent, regardless of the buffer or diluent used. MicroBCA also demonstrated the strongest correlation to the NTA-determined particle number across a range of vesicle concentrations. Overall, these results indicate that with appropriate diluent and buffer choice, microBCA vs. NTA standard curves could be generated and the microBCA assay used to estimate the particle number when NTA instrumentation is not readily available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106065552023-10-28 Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria Mosby, Chanel A. Perez Devia, Natalia Jones, Melissa K. Int J Mol Sci Article There are a variety of methods employed by laboratories for quantifying extracellular vesicles isolated from bacteria. As a result, the ability to compare results across published studies can lead to questions regarding the suitability of methods and buffers for accurately quantifying these vesicles. Within the literature, there are several common methods for vesicle quantification. These include lipid quantification using the lipophilic dye FM 4-64, protein quantification using microBCA, Qubit, and NanoOrange assays, or direct vesicle enumeration using nanoparticle tracking analysis. In addition, various diluents and lysis buffers are also used to resuspend and treat vesicles. In this study, we directly compared the quantification of a bacterial outer membrane vesicle using several commonly used methods. We also tested the impact of different buffers, buffer age, lysis method, and vesicle diluent on vesicle quantification. The results showed that buffer age had no significant effect on vesicle quantification, but the lysis method impacted the reliability of measurements using Qubit and NanoOrange. The microBCA assay displayed the least variability in protein concentration values and was the most consistent, regardless of the buffer or diluent used. MicroBCA also demonstrated the strongest correlation to the NTA-determined particle number across a range of vesicle concentrations. Overall, these results indicate that with appropriate diluent and buffer choice, microBCA vs. NTA standard curves could be generated and the microBCA assay used to estimate the particle number when NTA instrumentation is not readily available. MDPI 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10606555/ /pubmed/37894776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015096 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mosby, Chanel A.
Perez Devia, Natalia
Jones, Melissa K.
Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
title Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
title_full Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
title_fullStr Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
title_short Comparison of Methods for Quantifying Extracellular Vesicles of Gram-Negative Bacteria
title_sort comparison of methods for quantifying extracellular vesicles of gram-negative bacteria
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37894776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015096
work_keys_str_mv AT mosbychanela comparisonofmethodsforquantifyingextracellularvesiclesofgramnegativebacteria
AT perezdevianatalia comparisonofmethodsforquantifyingextracellularvesiclesofgramnegativebacteria
AT jonesmelissak comparisonofmethodsforquantifyingextracellularvesiclesofgramnegativebacteria