Cargando…

Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale

The food system represents a complex, interrelated, and interdependent network of individuals and organizations. Despite the unique characteristics of the food system domain, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of leadership capacity amongst food system professionals. The present study pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lamm, Kevan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12203746
_version_ 1785127350163210240
author Lamm, Kevan W.
author_facet Lamm, Kevan W.
author_sort Lamm, Kevan W.
collection PubMed
description The food system represents a complex, interrelated, and interdependent network of individuals and organizations. Despite the unique characteristics of the food system domain, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of leadership capacity amongst food system professionals. The present study provides an empirical assessment of food system leadership capacity using many leadership instruments. The study included pilot (n = 125) and primary (n = 4185) data collection across 27 food system-related leadership development programs. The results validate the Issue Leadership scale, which comprises seven capacity areas: action, change, communication, critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning, interpersonal traits and characteristics, leadership process, and leadership skills. The Issue Leadership scale captures both perception of importance and current skill level. The study results indicate that food system professionals perceived communication and critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning as the most important leadership capacity areas. Furthermore, respondents indicated the highest level of self-perceived skill in critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning, and interpersonal traits and characteristics. Overall, respondents had higher perceived importance levels (m = 4.17) than skill (m = 3.44), indicating the need for additional leadership capacity development amongst food system professionals. Respondents also indicated similar levels of opinion leadership (m = 3.92), servant leadership (m = 3.82), transformational leadership (m = 3.78), and transactional leadership (m = 3.70), providing an additional empirical assessment of food system professional leadership capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106065802023-10-28 Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale Lamm, Kevan W. Foods Article The food system represents a complex, interrelated, and interdependent network of individuals and organizations. Despite the unique characteristics of the food system domain, there has never been a comprehensive analysis of leadership capacity amongst food system professionals. The present study provides an empirical assessment of food system leadership capacity using many leadership instruments. The study included pilot (n = 125) and primary (n = 4185) data collection across 27 food system-related leadership development programs. The results validate the Issue Leadership scale, which comprises seven capacity areas: action, change, communication, critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning, interpersonal traits and characteristics, leadership process, and leadership skills. The Issue Leadership scale captures both perception of importance and current skill level. The study results indicate that food system professionals perceived communication and critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning as the most important leadership capacity areas. Furthermore, respondents indicated the highest level of self-perceived skill in critical thinking, strategic planning and visioning, and interpersonal traits and characteristics. Overall, respondents had higher perceived importance levels (m = 4.17) than skill (m = 3.44), indicating the need for additional leadership capacity development amongst food system professionals. Respondents also indicated similar levels of opinion leadership (m = 3.92), servant leadership (m = 3.82), transformational leadership (m = 3.78), and transactional leadership (m = 3.70), providing an additional empirical assessment of food system professional leadership capacity. MDPI 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10606580/ /pubmed/37893638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12203746 Text en © 2023 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lamm, Kevan W.
Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale
title Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale
title_full Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale
title_fullStr Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale
title_short Assessing Leadership Capacity in the Food System: The Issue Leadership Scale
title_sort assessing leadership capacity in the food system: the issue leadership scale
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12203746
work_keys_str_mv AT lammkevanw assessingleadershipcapacityinthefoodsystemtheissueleadershipscale