Cargando…
Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876165 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231225 |
_version_ | 1785127387938160640 |
---|---|
author | Atar, Funda Keskin, Gülsen Karaca Akaslan, Filiz Tıraş, Yasemin Dönmez, Aslı |
author_facet | Atar, Funda Keskin, Gülsen Karaca Akaslan, Filiz Tıraş, Yasemin Dönmez, Aslı |
author_sort | Atar, Funda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered to the patients. To achieve PLMA fixation, patients were randomly assigned to either adjustable elastic band (Group I) or adhesive tape fixation (Group II). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) evaluation and glottic image grading (grade 1-4) and lip margin distances of PLMA (M1 and M2) were evaluated before and after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: We enrolled 116 patients. Surgery of 7 patients was postponed. PLMA dislocated in 2 patients in group II during positioning. For another patient who used adhesive tape in Group II, it was removed because it could not adhere to properly, and a new sticking plaster was used. The study was completed with 106 patients. In FOB evaluation, the number of patients with optimal FOB grade (FOB grade 1) after PLMA was inserted and fixed was more in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.01). FOB evaluation was repeated at the end of the operation, and the number of patients with the worst FOB grade (FOB grade 4) was 0 (0%) and 11 (10.5%) in Groups I and II, respectively. PLMA displaced more than 1 cm in 10 (18.9%) patients in Group I and in 30 patients (56.6%) in Group II. CONCLUSION: The adjustable elastic band method is simple, easy, and convenient and can be used in any surgical procedure for PLMA fixation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10606738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106067382023-10-28 Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation Atar, Funda Keskin, Gülsen Karaca Akaslan, Filiz Tıraş, Yasemin Dönmez, Aslı Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered to the patients. To achieve PLMA fixation, patients were randomly assigned to either adjustable elastic band (Group I) or adhesive tape fixation (Group II). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) evaluation and glottic image grading (grade 1-4) and lip margin distances of PLMA (M1 and M2) were evaluated before and after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: We enrolled 116 patients. Surgery of 7 patients was postponed. PLMA dislocated in 2 patients in group II during positioning. For another patient who used adhesive tape in Group II, it was removed because it could not adhere to properly, and a new sticking plaster was used. The study was completed with 106 patients. In FOB evaluation, the number of patients with optimal FOB grade (FOB grade 1) after PLMA was inserted and fixed was more in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.01). FOB evaluation was repeated at the end of the operation, and the number of patients with the worst FOB grade (FOB grade 4) was 0 (0%) and 11 (10.5%) in Groups I and II, respectively. PLMA displaced more than 1 cm in 10 (18.9%) patients in Group I and in 30 patients (56.6%) in Group II. CONCLUSION: The adjustable elastic band method is simple, easy, and convenient and can be used in any surgical procedure for PLMA fixation. Galenos Publishing 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10606738/ /pubmed/37876165 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231225 Text en ©Copyright 2023 by the Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Association / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation is published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Atar, Funda Keskin, Gülsen Karaca Akaslan, Filiz Tıraş, Yasemin Dönmez, Aslı Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation |
title | Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation |
title_full | Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation |
title_short | Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation |
title_sort | comparison of two different methods for proseal(tm) laryngeal mask fixation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876165 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atarfunda comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation AT keskingulsen comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation AT karacaakaslanfiliz comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation AT tırasyasemin comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation AT donmezaslı comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation |