Cargando…

Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation

OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atar, Funda, Keskin, Gülsen, Karaca Akaslan, Filiz, Tıraş, Yasemin, Dönmez, Aslı
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876165
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231225
_version_ 1785127387938160640
author Atar, Funda
Keskin, Gülsen
Karaca Akaslan, Filiz
Tıraş, Yasemin
Dönmez, Aslı
author_facet Atar, Funda
Keskin, Gülsen
Karaca Akaslan, Filiz
Tıraş, Yasemin
Dönmez, Aslı
author_sort Atar, Funda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered to the patients. To achieve PLMA fixation, patients were randomly assigned to either adjustable elastic band (Group I) or adhesive tape fixation (Group II). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) evaluation and glottic image grading (grade 1-4) and lip margin distances of PLMA (M1 and M2) were evaluated before and after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: We enrolled 116 patients. Surgery of 7 patients was postponed. PLMA dislocated in 2 patients in group II during positioning. For another patient who used adhesive tape in Group II, it was removed because it could not adhere to properly, and a new sticking plaster was used. The study was completed with 106 patients. In FOB evaluation, the number of patients with optimal FOB grade (FOB grade 1) after PLMA was inserted and fixed was more in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.01). FOB evaluation was repeated at the end of the operation, and the number of patients with the worst FOB grade (FOB grade 4) was 0 (0%) and 11 (10.5%) in Groups I and II, respectively. PLMA displaced more than 1 cm in 10 (18.9%) patients in Group I and in 30 patients (56.6%) in Group II. CONCLUSION: The adjustable elastic band method is simple, easy, and convenient and can be used in any surgical procedure for PLMA fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106067382023-10-28 Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation Atar, Funda Keskin, Gülsen Karaca Akaslan, Filiz Tıraş, Yasemin Dönmez, Aslı Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for Proseal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered to the patients. To achieve PLMA fixation, patients were randomly assigned to either adjustable elastic band (Group I) or adhesive tape fixation (Group II). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) evaluation and glottic image grading (grade 1-4) and lip margin distances of PLMA (M1 and M2) were evaluated before and after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: We enrolled 116 patients. Surgery of 7 patients was postponed. PLMA dislocated in 2 patients in group II during positioning. For another patient who used adhesive tape in Group II, it was removed because it could not adhere to properly, and a new sticking plaster was used. The study was completed with 106 patients. In FOB evaluation, the number of patients with optimal FOB grade (FOB grade 1) after PLMA was inserted and fixed was more in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.01). FOB evaluation was repeated at the end of the operation, and the number of patients with the worst FOB grade (FOB grade 4) was 0 (0%) and 11 (10.5%) in Groups I and II, respectively. PLMA displaced more than 1 cm in 10 (18.9%) patients in Group I and in 30 patients (56.6%) in Group II. CONCLUSION: The adjustable elastic band method is simple, easy, and convenient and can be used in any surgical procedure for PLMA fixation. Galenos Publishing 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10606738/ /pubmed/37876165 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231225 Text en ©Copyright 2023 by the Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Association / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation is published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Atar, Funda
Keskin, Gülsen
Karaca Akaslan, Filiz
Tıraş, Yasemin
Dönmez, Aslı
Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
title Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
title_full Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
title_short Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSeal(TM) Laryngeal Mask Fixation
title_sort comparison of two different methods for proseal(tm) laryngeal mask fixation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876165
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.231225
work_keys_str_mv AT atarfunda comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation
AT keskingulsen comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation
AT karacaakaslanfiliz comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation
AT tırasyasemin comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation
AT donmezaslı comparisonoftwodifferentmethodsforprosealtmlaryngealmaskfixation