Cargando…
Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1
The highly mutated BA.2.86, with over 30 spike protein mutations in comparison to Omicron BA.2 and XBB.1.5 variants, has raised concerns about its potential to evade COVID-19 vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection-elicited immunity. In this study, we employ a live SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2271089 |
_version_ | 1785127398199525376 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Yanping Zou, Jing Kurhade, Chaitanya Deng, Xiangxue Chang, Hope C. Kim, Debora K. Shi, Pei-Yong Ren, Ping Xie, Xuping |
author_facet | Hu, Yanping Zou, Jing Kurhade, Chaitanya Deng, Xiangxue Chang, Hope C. Kim, Debora K. Shi, Pei-Yong Ren, Ping Xie, Xuping |
author_sort | Hu, Yanping |
collection | PubMed |
description | The highly mutated BA.2.86, with over 30 spike protein mutations in comparison to Omicron BA.2 and XBB.1.5 variants, has raised concerns about its potential to evade COVID-19 vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection-elicited immunity. In this study, we employ a live SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay to compare the neutralization evasion ability of BA.2.86 with other emerged SARS-CoV-2 subvariants, including BA.2-derived CH.1.1, Delta-Omicron recombinant XBC.1.6, and XBB descendants XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, XBB.2.3, EG.5.1 and FL.1.5.1. Our results show that BA.2.86 is less neutralization evasive than XBB sublineages. XBB descendants XBB.1.16, EG.5.1, and FL.1.5.1 continue to significantly evade neutralization induced by the parental COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and a BA.5 Bivalent booster. Notably, when compared to XBB.1.5, the more recent XBB descendants, particularly EG.5.1, display increased resistance to neutralization. Among all the tested variants, CH.1.1 exhibits the greatest neutralization evasion. In contrast, XBC.1.6 shows a slight reduction but remains comparably sensitive to neutralization when compared to BA.5. Furthermore, a recent XBB.1.5-breakthrough infection significantly enhances the breadth and potency of cross-neutralization. These findings reinforce the expectation that the upcoming XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccine would likely boost the neutralization of currently circulating variants, while also underscoring the critical importance of ongoing surveillance to monitor the evolution and immune evasion potential of SARS-CoV-2 variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10606781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106067812023-10-28 Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 Hu, Yanping Zou, Jing Kurhade, Chaitanya Deng, Xiangxue Chang, Hope C. Kim, Debora K. Shi, Pei-Yong Ren, Ping Xie, Xuping Emerg Microbes Infect Emerging and Re-Emerging Coronaviruses The highly mutated BA.2.86, with over 30 spike protein mutations in comparison to Omicron BA.2 and XBB.1.5 variants, has raised concerns about its potential to evade COVID-19 vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection-elicited immunity. In this study, we employ a live SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay to compare the neutralization evasion ability of BA.2.86 with other emerged SARS-CoV-2 subvariants, including BA.2-derived CH.1.1, Delta-Omicron recombinant XBC.1.6, and XBB descendants XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, XBB.2.3, EG.5.1 and FL.1.5.1. Our results show that BA.2.86 is less neutralization evasive than XBB sublineages. XBB descendants XBB.1.16, EG.5.1, and FL.1.5.1 continue to significantly evade neutralization induced by the parental COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and a BA.5 Bivalent booster. Notably, when compared to XBB.1.5, the more recent XBB descendants, particularly EG.5.1, display increased resistance to neutralization. Among all the tested variants, CH.1.1 exhibits the greatest neutralization evasion. In contrast, XBC.1.6 shows a slight reduction but remains comparably sensitive to neutralization when compared to BA.5. Furthermore, a recent XBB.1.5-breakthrough infection significantly enhances the breadth and potency of cross-neutralization. These findings reinforce the expectation that the upcoming XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccine would likely boost the neutralization of currently circulating variants, while also underscoring the critical importance of ongoing surveillance to monitor the evolution and immune evasion potential of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Taylor & Francis 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10606781/ /pubmed/37824708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2271089 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of Shanghai Shangyixun Cultural Communication Co., Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Emerging and Re-Emerging Coronaviruses Hu, Yanping Zou, Jing Kurhade, Chaitanya Deng, Xiangxue Chang, Hope C. Kim, Debora K. Shi, Pei-Yong Ren, Ping Xie, Xuping Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 |
title | Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 |
title_full | Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 |
title_fullStr | Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 |
title_full_unstemmed | Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 |
title_short | Less neutralization evasion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 than XBB sublineages and CH.1.1 |
title_sort | less neutralization evasion of sars-cov-2 ba.2.86 than xbb sublineages and ch.1.1 |
topic | Emerging and Re-Emerging Coronaviruses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2271089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huyanping lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT zoujing lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT kurhadechaitanya lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT dengxiangxue lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT changhopec lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT kimdeborak lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT shipeiyong lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT renping lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 AT xiexuping lessneutralizationevasionofsarscov2ba286thanxbbsublineagesandch11 |