Cargando…

Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study

The type of implant-abutment connection is one of the factors influencing the distribution of occlusal forces. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical performance of the mandibular all-on-4 treatment with different implant–abutment connections. Two connection types with 30° abutments and 18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Pei-Shuang, Tsai, Ming-Hsu, Wu, Yu-Ling, Chen, Hung-Shyong, Lei, Yao-Ning, Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888180
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100515
_version_ 1785127439012200448
author Wang, Pei-Shuang
Tsai, Ming-Hsu
Wu, Yu-Ling
Chen, Hung-Shyong
Lei, Yao-Ning
Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
author_facet Wang, Pei-Shuang
Tsai, Ming-Hsu
Wu, Yu-Ling
Chen, Hung-Shyong
Lei, Yao-Ning
Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
author_sort Wang, Pei-Shuang
collection PubMed
description The type of implant-abutment connection is one of the factors influencing the distribution of occlusal forces. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical performance of the mandibular all-on-4 treatment with different implant–abutment connections. Two connection types with 30° abutments and 18-mm implant fixtures were chosen for the posterior implants of the all-on-4 assembly. For the external hexagon connection (EHC) group, the implants with 4 mm in diameter were used. For the internal hexagon connection (IHC) group, we selected implants with 4.3 mm in diameter. A vertical force of 190 N was applied to the cantilever region. The FEA results indicated that the most stressed region in the two groups was prosthetic screws, followed by multi-unit abutments (MUAs). The lowest values of von Mises stress were both observed on the bone. The peak stress value of the implant screw and implant fixture in the EHC group were 37.75% and 33.03% lower than the IHC group, respectively. For stress distribution patterns, the load force tended to be concentrated at locations where components were interconnected. The EHC and IHC are clinically durable under the tested loading conditions, but the prosthetic screws and MUAs can be the weak point on the posterior implant within the mandibular all-on-four assembly. The peak stress values of implant screw and implant fixture in the EHC groups were lower than the IHC group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10606984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106069842023-10-28 Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study Wang, Pei-Shuang Tsai, Ming-Hsu Wu, Yu-Ling Chen, Hung-Shyong Lei, Yao-Ning Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen J Funct Biomater Article The type of implant-abutment connection is one of the factors influencing the distribution of occlusal forces. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical performance of the mandibular all-on-4 treatment with different implant–abutment connections. Two connection types with 30° abutments and 18-mm implant fixtures were chosen for the posterior implants of the all-on-4 assembly. For the external hexagon connection (EHC) group, the implants with 4 mm in diameter were used. For the internal hexagon connection (IHC) group, we selected implants with 4.3 mm in diameter. A vertical force of 190 N was applied to the cantilever region. The FEA results indicated that the most stressed region in the two groups was prosthetic screws, followed by multi-unit abutments (MUAs). The lowest values of von Mises stress were both observed on the bone. The peak stress value of the implant screw and implant fixture in the EHC group were 37.75% and 33.03% lower than the IHC group, respectively. For stress distribution patterns, the load force tended to be concentrated at locations where components were interconnected. The EHC and IHC are clinically durable under the tested loading conditions, but the prosthetic screws and MUAs can be the weak point on the posterior implant within the mandibular all-on-four assembly. The peak stress values of implant screw and implant fixture in the EHC groups were lower than the IHC group. MDPI 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10606984/ /pubmed/37888180 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100515 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Pei-Shuang
Tsai, Ming-Hsu
Wu, Yu-Ling
Chen, Hung-Shyong
Lei, Yao-Ning
Wu, Aaron Yu-Jen
Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_full Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_fullStr Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_short Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study
title_sort biomechanical analysis of titanium dental implants in the all-on-4 treatment with different implant–abutment connections: a three-dimensional finite element study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888180
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100515
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpeishuang biomechanicalanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantsintheallon4treatmentwithdifferentimplantabutmentconnectionsathreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT tsaiminghsu biomechanicalanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantsintheallon4treatmentwithdifferentimplantabutmentconnectionsathreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT wuyuling biomechanicalanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantsintheallon4treatmentwithdifferentimplantabutmentconnectionsathreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT chenhungshyong biomechanicalanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantsintheallon4treatmentwithdifferentimplantabutmentconnectionsathreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT leiyaoning biomechanicalanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantsintheallon4treatmentwithdifferentimplantabutmentconnectionsathreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy
AT wuaaronyujen biomechanicalanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantsintheallon4treatmentwithdifferentimplantabutmentconnectionsathreedimensionalfiniteelementstudy