Cargando…

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020

We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gin, Taylor E., Petzold, Elizabeth A., Uthappa, Diya M., Neighbors, Coralei E., Borough, Anna R., Gin, Craig, Lashnits, Erin, Sempowski, Gregory D., Denny, Thomas, Bienzle, Dorothee, Weese, J. Scott, Callahan, Benjamin J., Woods, Christopher W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901455
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16310
_version_ 1785127486999232512
author Gin, Taylor E.
Petzold, Elizabeth A.
Uthappa, Diya M.
Neighbors, Coralei E.
Borough, Anna R.
Gin, Craig
Lashnits, Erin
Sempowski, Gregory D.
Denny, Thomas
Bienzle, Dorothee
Weese, J. Scott
Callahan, Benjamin J.
Woods, Christopher W.
author_facet Gin, Taylor E.
Petzold, Elizabeth A.
Uthappa, Diya M.
Neighbors, Coralei E.
Borough, Anna R.
Gin, Craig
Lashnits, Erin
Sempowski, Gregory D.
Denny, Thomas
Bienzle, Dorothee
Weese, J. Scott
Callahan, Benjamin J.
Woods, Christopher W.
author_sort Gin, Taylor E.
collection PubMed
description We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints. Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-offs for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. A small number of pet dogs (2/43, 4.7%) and one cat (1/21, 4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 28.6 and 37.5% of cats and dogs were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106071862023-10-28 Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 Gin, Taylor E. Petzold, Elizabeth A. Uthappa, Diya M. Neighbors, Coralei E. Borough, Anna R. Gin, Craig Lashnits, Erin Sempowski, Gregory D. Denny, Thomas Bienzle, Dorothee Weese, J. Scott Callahan, Benjamin J. Woods, Christopher W. PeerJ Veterinary Medicine We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints. Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-offs for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. A small number of pet dogs (2/43, 4.7%) and one cat (1/21, 4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 28.6 and 37.5% of cats and dogs were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, respectively. PeerJ Inc. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10607186/ /pubmed/37901455 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16310 Text en ©2023 Gin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Veterinary Medicine
Gin, Taylor E.
Petzold, Elizabeth A.
Uthappa, Diya M.
Neighbors, Coralei E.
Borough, Anna R.
Gin, Craig
Lashnits, Erin
Sempowski, Gregory D.
Denny, Thomas
Bienzle, Dorothee
Weese, J. Scott
Callahan, Benjamin J.
Woods, Christopher W.
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
title Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
title_full Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
title_fullStr Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
title_short Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
title_sort evaluation of sars-cov-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in sars-cov-2-positive homes in north carolina, march to december 2020
topic Veterinary Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901455
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16310
work_keys_str_mv AT gintaylore evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT petzoldelizabetha evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT uthappadiyam evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT neighborscoraleie evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT boroughannar evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT gincraig evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT lashnitserin evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT sempowskigregoryd evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT dennythomas evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT bienzledorothee evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT weesejscott evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT callahanbenjaminj evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020
AT woodschristopherw evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020