Cargando…
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020
We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901455 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16310 |
_version_ | 1785127486999232512 |
---|---|
author | Gin, Taylor E. Petzold, Elizabeth A. Uthappa, Diya M. Neighbors, Coralei E. Borough, Anna R. Gin, Craig Lashnits, Erin Sempowski, Gregory D. Denny, Thomas Bienzle, Dorothee Weese, J. Scott Callahan, Benjamin J. Woods, Christopher W. |
author_facet | Gin, Taylor E. Petzold, Elizabeth A. Uthappa, Diya M. Neighbors, Coralei E. Borough, Anna R. Gin, Craig Lashnits, Erin Sempowski, Gregory D. Denny, Thomas Bienzle, Dorothee Weese, J. Scott Callahan, Benjamin J. Woods, Christopher W. |
author_sort | Gin, Taylor E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints. Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-offs for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. A small number of pet dogs (2/43, 4.7%) and one cat (1/21, 4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 28.6 and 37.5% of cats and dogs were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10607186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106071862023-10-28 Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 Gin, Taylor E. Petzold, Elizabeth A. Uthappa, Diya M. Neighbors, Coralei E. Borough, Anna R. Gin, Craig Lashnits, Erin Sempowski, Gregory D. Denny, Thomas Bienzle, Dorothee Weese, J. Scott Callahan, Benjamin J. Woods, Christopher W. PeerJ Veterinary Medicine We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints. Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-offs for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. A small number of pet dogs (2/43, 4.7%) and one cat (1/21, 4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 28.6 and 37.5% of cats and dogs were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, respectively. PeerJ Inc. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10607186/ /pubmed/37901455 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16310 Text en ©2023 Gin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Medicine Gin, Taylor E. Petzold, Elizabeth A. Uthappa, Diya M. Neighbors, Coralei E. Borough, Anna R. Gin, Craig Lashnits, Erin Sempowski, Gregory D. Denny, Thomas Bienzle, Dorothee Weese, J. Scott Callahan, Benjamin J. Woods, Christopher W. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 |
title | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 |
title_full | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 |
title_short | Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in SARS-CoV-2-positive homes in North Carolina, March to December 2020 |
title_sort | evaluation of sars-cov-2 identification methods through surveillance of companion animals in sars-cov-2-positive homes in north carolina, march to december 2020 |
topic | Veterinary Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901455 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gintaylore evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT petzoldelizabetha evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT uthappadiyam evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT neighborscoraleie evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT boroughannar evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT gincraig evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT lashnitserin evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT sempowskigregoryd evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT dennythomas evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT bienzledorothee evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT weesejscott evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT callahanbenjaminj evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 AT woodschristopherw evaluationofsarscov2identificationmethodsthroughsurveillanceofcompanionanimalsinsarscov2positivehomesinnorthcarolinamarchtodecember2020 |