Cargando…

Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits

Background: Infection of orthopaedic implants after internal fixation of bone fractures remains a major complication with occasionally devastating consequences. Recent studies have reported that the use of absorbable materials, instead of metallic ones, may lead to a lower incidence of postoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitridis, Dimitrios, Savvidis, Panagiotis, Cheva, Angeliki, Papalois, Apostolos, Givissis, Panagiotis, Chalidis, Byron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100498
_version_ 1785127506534203392
author Kitridis, Dimitrios
Savvidis, Panagiotis
Cheva, Angeliki
Papalois, Apostolos
Givissis, Panagiotis
Chalidis, Byron
author_facet Kitridis, Dimitrios
Savvidis, Panagiotis
Cheva, Angeliki
Papalois, Apostolos
Givissis, Panagiotis
Chalidis, Byron
author_sort Kitridis, Dimitrios
collection PubMed
description Background: Infection of orthopaedic implants after internal fixation of bone fractures remains a major complication with occasionally devastating consequences. Recent studies have reported that the use of absorbable materials, instead of metallic ones, may lead to a lower incidence of postoperative infection. In this experimental pre-clinical animal study, we compared the infection rate between absorbable implants consisting of copolymers composed from trimethylene carbonate, L-polylactic acid, and D, L-polylactic acid monomers, and titanium implants after the inoculation of a pathogenic microorganism. Material and Methods: We used an experimental implant-related infection model in rabbits. Sixty animals were randomly and equally divided into two groups. In all animals, the right femur was exposed via a lateral approach and a 2.5 mm two-hole titanium plate with screws (Group A), or a two-hole absorbable plate and screws (Group B), were applied in the femoral shaft. Afterwards, the implant surface was inoculated with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa at a concentration of 2 × 10(8) CFU/mL. The primary outcome was the comparison of the incidence of developed infection between the two groups. The wound condition was monitored on a daily basis and radiographies were obtained at 12 weeks postoperatively. Infection-related laboratory markers (white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein values) were assessed at 3, 6, and 16 weeks postoperatively. Histologic analysis and cultures of tissue samples were also performed to evaluate the presence of infection. Results: Clinical and laboratory signs of infection were evident in 11 rabbits in Group A (36.7%), and 4 in Group B (13.3%). The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Five animals in Group B (16.7%) had clinical and histologic signs of a foreign-body reaction with significantly elevated CRP and ESR values but no simultaneous presence of infection was identified (p = 0.04). Bone remodelling with thickening of the periosteum and surrounding sclerosis was demonstrated radiologically in animals developing infection or foreign-body reactions. Conclusions: Absorbable plates and screws show lower susceptibility to infection compared to titanium ones. However, their application is associated with foreign-body reaction and the potential need for a second surgical intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106072712023-10-28 Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits Kitridis, Dimitrios Savvidis, Panagiotis Cheva, Angeliki Papalois, Apostolos Givissis, Panagiotis Chalidis, Byron J Funct Biomater Article Background: Infection of orthopaedic implants after internal fixation of bone fractures remains a major complication with occasionally devastating consequences. Recent studies have reported that the use of absorbable materials, instead of metallic ones, may lead to a lower incidence of postoperative infection. In this experimental pre-clinical animal study, we compared the infection rate between absorbable implants consisting of copolymers composed from trimethylene carbonate, L-polylactic acid, and D, L-polylactic acid monomers, and titanium implants after the inoculation of a pathogenic microorganism. Material and Methods: We used an experimental implant-related infection model in rabbits. Sixty animals were randomly and equally divided into two groups. In all animals, the right femur was exposed via a lateral approach and a 2.5 mm two-hole titanium plate with screws (Group A), or a two-hole absorbable plate and screws (Group B), were applied in the femoral shaft. Afterwards, the implant surface was inoculated with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa at a concentration of 2 × 10(8) CFU/mL. The primary outcome was the comparison of the incidence of developed infection between the two groups. The wound condition was monitored on a daily basis and radiographies were obtained at 12 weeks postoperatively. Infection-related laboratory markers (white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein values) were assessed at 3, 6, and 16 weeks postoperatively. Histologic analysis and cultures of tissue samples were also performed to evaluate the presence of infection. Results: Clinical and laboratory signs of infection were evident in 11 rabbits in Group A (36.7%), and 4 in Group B (13.3%). The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Five animals in Group B (16.7%) had clinical and histologic signs of a foreign-body reaction with significantly elevated CRP and ESR values but no simultaneous presence of infection was identified (p = 0.04). Bone remodelling with thickening of the periosteum and surrounding sclerosis was demonstrated radiologically in animals developing infection or foreign-body reactions. Conclusions: Absorbable plates and screws show lower susceptibility to infection compared to titanium ones. However, their application is associated with foreign-body reaction and the potential need for a second surgical intervention. MDPI 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10607271/ /pubmed/37888163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100498 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kitridis, Dimitrios
Savvidis, Panagiotis
Cheva, Angeliki
Papalois, Apostolos
Givissis, Panagiotis
Chalidis, Byron
Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits
title Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits
title_full Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits
title_fullStr Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits
title_short Are Absorbable Plates More Resistant to Infection Than Titanium Implants? An Experimental Pre-Clinical Trial in Rabbits
title_sort are absorbable plates more resistant to infection than titanium implants? an experimental pre-clinical trial in rabbits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100498
work_keys_str_mv AT kitridisdimitrios areabsorbableplatesmoreresistanttoinfectionthantitaniumimplantsanexperimentalpreclinicaltrialinrabbits
AT savvidispanagiotis areabsorbableplatesmoreresistanttoinfectionthantitaniumimplantsanexperimentalpreclinicaltrialinrabbits
AT chevaangeliki areabsorbableplatesmoreresistanttoinfectionthantitaniumimplantsanexperimentalpreclinicaltrialinrabbits
AT papaloisapostolos areabsorbableplatesmoreresistanttoinfectionthantitaniumimplantsanexperimentalpreclinicaltrialinrabbits
AT givissispanagiotis areabsorbableplatesmoreresistanttoinfectionthantitaniumimplantsanexperimentalpreclinicaltrialinrabbits
AT chalidisbyron areabsorbableplatesmoreresistanttoinfectionthantitaniumimplantsanexperimentalpreclinicaltrialinrabbits