Cargando…

Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net

Computer-assisted technologies have made significant progress in fetoscopic laser surgery, including placental vessel segmentation. However, the intra- and inter-procedure variabilities in the state-of-the-art segmentation methods remain a significant hurdle. To address this, we investigated the use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Schot, Anouk, Sikkel, Esther, Niekolaas, Marèll, Spaanderman, Marc, de Jong, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100226
_version_ 1785127518529912832
author van der Schot, Anouk
Sikkel, Esther
Niekolaas, Marèll
Spaanderman, Marc
de Jong, Guido
author_facet van der Schot, Anouk
Sikkel, Esther
Niekolaas, Marèll
Spaanderman, Marc
de Jong, Guido
author_sort van der Schot, Anouk
collection PubMed
description Computer-assisted technologies have made significant progress in fetoscopic laser surgery, including placental vessel segmentation. However, the intra- and inter-procedure variabilities in the state-of-the-art segmentation methods remain a significant hurdle. To address this, we investigated the use of conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) for fetoscopic image segmentation and compared their performance with the benchmark U-Net technique for placental vessel segmentation. Two deep-learning models, U-Net and pix2pix (a popular cGAN model), were trained and evaluated using a publicly available dataset and an internal validation set. The overall results showed that the pix2pix model outperformed the U-Net model, with a Dice score of 0.80 [0.70; 0.86] versus 0.75 [0.0.60; 0.84] (p-value < 0.01) and an Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.70 [0.61; 0.77] compared to 0.66 [0.53; 0.75] (p-value < 0.01), respectively. The internal validation dataset further validated the superiority of the pix2pix model, achieving Dice and IoU scores of 0.68 [0.53; 0.79] and 0.59 [0.49; 0.69] (p-value < 0.01), respectively, while the U-Net model obtained scores of 0.53 [0.49; 0.64] and 0.49 [0.17; 0.56], respectively. This study successfully compared U-Net and pix2pix models for placental vessel segmentation in fetoscopic images, demonstrating improved results with the cGAN-based approach. However, the challenge of achieving generalizability still needs to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106073212023-10-28 Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net van der Schot, Anouk Sikkel, Esther Niekolaas, Marèll Spaanderman, Marc de Jong, Guido J Imaging Brief Report Computer-assisted technologies have made significant progress in fetoscopic laser surgery, including placental vessel segmentation. However, the intra- and inter-procedure variabilities in the state-of-the-art segmentation methods remain a significant hurdle. To address this, we investigated the use of conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) for fetoscopic image segmentation and compared their performance with the benchmark U-Net technique for placental vessel segmentation. Two deep-learning models, U-Net and pix2pix (a popular cGAN model), were trained and evaluated using a publicly available dataset and an internal validation set. The overall results showed that the pix2pix model outperformed the U-Net model, with a Dice score of 0.80 [0.70; 0.86] versus 0.75 [0.0.60; 0.84] (p-value < 0.01) and an Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.70 [0.61; 0.77] compared to 0.66 [0.53; 0.75] (p-value < 0.01), respectively. The internal validation dataset further validated the superiority of the pix2pix model, achieving Dice and IoU scores of 0.68 [0.53; 0.79] and 0.59 [0.49; 0.69] (p-value < 0.01), respectively, while the U-Net model obtained scores of 0.53 [0.49; 0.64] and 0.49 [0.17; 0.56], respectively. This study successfully compared U-Net and pix2pix models for placental vessel segmentation in fetoscopic images, demonstrating improved results with the cGAN-based approach. However, the challenge of achieving generalizability still needs to be addressed. MDPI 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10607321/ /pubmed/37888333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100226 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
van der Schot, Anouk
Sikkel, Esther
Niekolaas, Marèll
Spaanderman, Marc
de Jong, Guido
Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net
title Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net
title_full Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net
title_fullStr Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net
title_full_unstemmed Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net
title_short Placental Vessel Segmentation Using Pix2pix Compared to U-Net
title_sort placental vessel segmentation using pix2pix compared to u-net
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100226
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderschotanouk placentalvesselsegmentationusingpix2pixcomparedtounet
AT sikkelesther placentalvesselsegmentationusingpix2pixcomparedtounet
AT niekolaasmarell placentalvesselsegmentationusingpix2pixcomparedtounet
AT spaandermanmarc placentalvesselsegmentationusingpix2pixcomparedtounet
AT dejongguido placentalvesselsegmentationusingpix2pixcomparedtounet