Cargando…
Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience
Background: Hedinger syndrome (HS) or carcinoid heart disease (CD) is a rare and challenging manifestation of malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) involving the heart. We aimed to report our experience with surgical strategies and midterm results in HS patients. Methods: Eleven patients (58 ± 11...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100413 |
_version_ | 1785127524115677184 |
---|---|
author | El Gabry, Mohamed Arends, Sven Shehada, Sharaf-Eldin Lahner, Harald Kamler, Markus Wendt, Daniel Spetsotaki, Konstantina |
author_facet | El Gabry, Mohamed Arends, Sven Shehada, Sharaf-Eldin Lahner, Harald Kamler, Markus Wendt, Daniel Spetsotaki, Konstantina |
author_sort | El Gabry, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Hedinger syndrome (HS) or carcinoid heart disease (CD) is a rare and challenging manifestation of malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) involving the heart. We aimed to report our experience with surgical strategies and midterm results in HS patients. Methods: Eleven patients (58 ± 11 (range 41 to 79 years); 5 females) with HS who underwent cardiac surgery in our department between 07/2005 and 05/2023 were analysed. Results: All patients showed a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV and in all the tricuspid valve (TV) was involved. Four patients received a TV replacement, and three TV reconstruction. Recently, to preserve the geometry and function of the compromised right ventricle (RV), we have applied the TV “bio-prosthesis in native-valve” implantation technique with the preservation of the valve apparatus (tricuspid valve implantation: TVI) in four cases. Concomitant procedures included pulmonary valve replacement in four, pulmonary implantation in one, and aortic valve replacement in three cases. To treat RV failure, we adapted a combined TandemHeart(®)-CytoSorb(®) haemoperfusion strategy in Patient #10 and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support avoidance, after experiencing an ECMO-induced carcinoid-storm-related death in Patient #8. Mortality at 30 days was 18% (2/11). The median follow up was 2 ± 2.1 years (range 1 month to 6 years) with an overall mortality during the follow-up period of 72.7% (8/11). Conclusions: HS surgery, despite being a high-risk procedure, can efficiently prolong survival, and represents a safe and feasible procedure. However, patient selection seems to be crucial. Further follow up and larger cohorts are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10607344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106073442023-10-28 Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience El Gabry, Mohamed Arends, Sven Shehada, Sharaf-Eldin Lahner, Harald Kamler, Markus Wendt, Daniel Spetsotaki, Konstantina J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Article Background: Hedinger syndrome (HS) or carcinoid heart disease (CD) is a rare and challenging manifestation of malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) involving the heart. We aimed to report our experience with surgical strategies and midterm results in HS patients. Methods: Eleven patients (58 ± 11 (range 41 to 79 years); 5 females) with HS who underwent cardiac surgery in our department between 07/2005 and 05/2023 were analysed. Results: All patients showed a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III–IV and in all the tricuspid valve (TV) was involved. Four patients received a TV replacement, and three TV reconstruction. Recently, to preserve the geometry and function of the compromised right ventricle (RV), we have applied the TV “bio-prosthesis in native-valve” implantation technique with the preservation of the valve apparatus (tricuspid valve implantation: TVI) in four cases. Concomitant procedures included pulmonary valve replacement in four, pulmonary implantation in one, and aortic valve replacement in three cases. To treat RV failure, we adapted a combined TandemHeart(®)-CytoSorb(®) haemoperfusion strategy in Patient #10 and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support avoidance, after experiencing an ECMO-induced carcinoid-storm-related death in Patient #8. Mortality at 30 days was 18% (2/11). The median follow up was 2 ± 2.1 years (range 1 month to 6 years) with an overall mortality during the follow-up period of 72.7% (8/11). Conclusions: HS surgery, despite being a high-risk procedure, can efficiently prolong survival, and represents a safe and feasible procedure. However, patient selection seems to be crucial. Further follow up and larger cohorts are needed. MDPI 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10607344/ /pubmed/37887860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100413 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article El Gabry, Mohamed Arends, Sven Shehada, Sharaf-Eldin Lahner, Harald Kamler, Markus Wendt, Daniel Spetsotaki, Konstantina Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience |
title | Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full | Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience |
title_fullStr | Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience |
title_short | Hedinger Syndrome—Lessons Learnt: A Single-Center Experience |
title_sort | hedinger syndrome—lessons learnt: a single-center experience |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37887860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10100413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elgabrymohamed hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience AT arendssven hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience AT shehadasharafeldin hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience AT lahnerharald hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience AT kamlermarkus hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience AT wendtdaniel hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience AT spetsotakikonstantina hedingersyndromelessonslearntasinglecenterexperience |