Cargando…

Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey

OBJECTIVE: Interventional radiology (IR) training in the UK has evolved since recognition as a subspecialty in 2010 and introduction of a new curriculum in 2021. The changing landscape, increasing workload and COVID-19 have affected training. The purpose of this study was to review trainees’ perspec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahay, Usman, Jenkins, Paul, Watkins, Linda, Mandal, Indrajeet, Lewis, Omotolani, Harborne, Katrina Elizabeth, Patel, Shian, Reicher, John, Liu, Wing Yan, Zhong, Jim, Hamady, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37747294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230039
_version_ 1785127534723072000
author Mahay, Usman
Jenkins, Paul
Watkins, Linda
Mandal, Indrajeet
Lewis, Omotolani
Harborne, Katrina Elizabeth
Patel, Shian
Reicher, John
Liu, Wing Yan
Zhong, Jim
Hamady, Mohamad
author_facet Mahay, Usman
Jenkins, Paul
Watkins, Linda
Mandal, Indrajeet
Lewis, Omotolani
Harborne, Katrina Elizabeth
Patel, Shian
Reicher, John
Liu, Wing Yan
Zhong, Jim
Hamady, Mohamad
author_sort Mahay, Usman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Interventional radiology (IR) training in the UK has evolved since recognition as a subspecialty in 2010 and introduction of a new curriculum in 2021. The changing landscape, increasing workload and COVID-19 have affected training. The purpose of this study was to review trainees’ perspectives on training and develop strategies to further improve training. METHODS: Online survey approved by the British Society of Interventional Radiology Council distributed to British Society of Interventional Radiology Trainee members between 9 March 22 and 25 March 2022. The survey was open to all UK based ST4-6 IR trainees and fellows. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: 43 responses were received from 17/19 UK training regions. Females represented 10% (4/41) and 5% (2/43) less than full time (LTFT) trainees. 82% (31/38) felt their curriculum was suitable for their training and 28/38 (74%) were satisfied with IR training. Vascular IR, Interventional Oncology, paediatrics and stroke thrombectomy were identified as areas of training desiring improvement. 45% (18/40) stated exposure to IR led clinics and 17.5% (7/40) to IR led ward rounds. Only 6/38 (15.7%) received structured IR teaching at least once a month. Approximately, a third of respondents (13/38) stated training opportunities were significantly compromised secondary to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This survey shows overall good satisfaction with IR training. However, improved training opportunities in vascular IR, interventional oncology, paediatric IR and stroke thrombectomy are required. In addition, access to clinics, ward rounds and protected time for research is needed to improve training quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: New national UK IR training survey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106073922023-10-28 Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey Mahay, Usman Jenkins, Paul Watkins, Linda Mandal, Indrajeet Lewis, Omotolani Harborne, Katrina Elizabeth Patel, Shian Reicher, John Liu, Wing Yan Zhong, Jim Hamady, Mohamad Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Interventional radiology (IR) training in the UK has evolved since recognition as a subspecialty in 2010 and introduction of a new curriculum in 2021. The changing landscape, increasing workload and COVID-19 have affected training. The purpose of this study was to review trainees’ perspectives on training and develop strategies to further improve training. METHODS: Online survey approved by the British Society of Interventional Radiology Council distributed to British Society of Interventional Radiology Trainee members between 9 March 22 and 25 March 2022. The survey was open to all UK based ST4-6 IR trainees and fellows. Descriptive and thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: 43 responses were received from 17/19 UK training regions. Females represented 10% (4/41) and 5% (2/43) less than full time (LTFT) trainees. 82% (31/38) felt their curriculum was suitable for their training and 28/38 (74%) were satisfied with IR training. Vascular IR, Interventional Oncology, paediatrics and stroke thrombectomy were identified as areas of training desiring improvement. 45% (18/40) stated exposure to IR led clinics and 17.5% (7/40) to IR led ward rounds. Only 6/38 (15.7%) received structured IR teaching at least once a month. Approximately, a third of respondents (13/38) stated training opportunities were significantly compromised secondary to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This survey shows overall good satisfaction with IR training. However, improved training opportunities in vascular IR, interventional oncology, paediatric IR and stroke thrombectomy are required. In addition, access to clinics, ward rounds and protected time for research is needed to improve training quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: New national UK IR training survey. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-11 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10607392/ /pubmed/37747294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230039 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Mahay, Usman
Jenkins, Paul
Watkins, Linda
Mandal, Indrajeet
Lewis, Omotolani
Harborne, Katrina Elizabeth
Patel, Shian
Reicher, John
Liu, Wing Yan
Zhong, Jim
Hamady, Mohamad
Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey
title Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey
title_full Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey
title_fullStr Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey
title_short Interventional radiology training in the UK: a view from within—a national survey
title_sort interventional radiology training in the uk: a view from within—a national survey
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37747294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230039
work_keys_str_mv AT mahayusman interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT jenkinspaul interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT watkinslinda interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT mandalindrajeet interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT lewisomotolani interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT harbornekatrinaelizabeth interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT patelshian interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT reicherjohn interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT liuwingyan interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT zhongjim interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey
AT hamadymohamad interventionalradiologytrainingintheukaviewfromwithinanationalsurvey