Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
(1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100215 |
_version_ | 1785127542286450688 |
---|---|
author | Abraham, Adriel Jose, Rejath Ahmad, Jawad Joshi, Jai Jacob, Thomas Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman Ali, Hassam Patel, Pratik Singh, Jaspreet Toma, Milan |
author_facet | Abraham, Adriel Jose, Rejath Ahmad, Jawad Joshi, Jai Jacob, Thomas Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman Ali, Hassam Patel, Pratik Singh, Jaspreet Toma, Milan |
author_sort | Abraham, Adriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the performance of three machine learning image classification models’ performance in detecting and classifying colon polyps. (2) Methods: The performance of three machine learning image classification models, Google Teachable Machine (GTM), Roboflow3 (RF3), and You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8n), in the detection and classification of colon polyps was evaluated using the testing split for each model. The external validity of the test was analyzed using 90 images that were not used to test, train, or validate the model. The study used a dataset of colonoscopy images of normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps. The study assessed the models’ ability to correctly classify the images into their respective classes using precision, recall, and F1 score generated from confusion matrix analysis and performance graphs. (3) Results: All three models successfully distinguished between normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps in colonoscopy images. GTM achieved the highest accuracies: 0.99, with consistent precision, recall, and F1 scores of 1.00 for the ‘normal’ class, 0.97–1.00 for ‘polyps’, and 0.97–1.00 for ‘resected polyps’. While GTM exclusively classified images into these three categories, both YOLOv8n and RF3 were able to detect and specify the location of normal colonic tissue, polyps, and resected polyps, with YOLOv8n and RF3 achieving overall accuracies of 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Machine learning, particularly models like GTM, shows promising results in ensuring comprehensive detection of polyps during colonoscopies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10607441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106074412023-10-28 Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps Abraham, Adriel Jose, Rejath Ahmad, Jawad Joshi, Jai Jacob, Thomas Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman Ali, Hassam Patel, Pratik Singh, Jaspreet Toma, Milan J Imaging Article (1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the performance of three machine learning image classification models’ performance in detecting and classifying colon polyps. (2) Methods: The performance of three machine learning image classification models, Google Teachable Machine (GTM), Roboflow3 (RF3), and You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8n), in the detection and classification of colon polyps was evaluated using the testing split for each model. The external validity of the test was analyzed using 90 images that were not used to test, train, or validate the model. The study used a dataset of colonoscopy images of normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps. The study assessed the models’ ability to correctly classify the images into their respective classes using precision, recall, and F1 score generated from confusion matrix analysis and performance graphs. (3) Results: All three models successfully distinguished between normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps in colonoscopy images. GTM achieved the highest accuracies: 0.99, with consistent precision, recall, and F1 scores of 1.00 for the ‘normal’ class, 0.97–1.00 for ‘polyps’, and 0.97–1.00 for ‘resected polyps’. While GTM exclusively classified images into these three categories, both YOLOv8n and RF3 were able to detect and specify the location of normal colonic tissue, polyps, and resected polyps, with YOLOv8n and RF3 achieving overall accuracies of 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Machine learning, particularly models like GTM, shows promising results in ensuring comprehensive detection of polyps during colonoscopies. MDPI 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10607441/ /pubmed/37888322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100215 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Abraham, Adriel Jose, Rejath Ahmad, Jawad Joshi, Jai Jacob, Thomas Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman Ali, Hassam Patel, Pratik Singh, Jaspreet Toma, Milan Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps |
title | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps |
title_sort | comparative analysis of machine learning models for image detection of colonic polyps vs. resected polyps |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamadriel comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT joserejath comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT ahmadjawad comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT joshijai comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT jacobthomas comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT khalidazizurrahman comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT alihassam comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT patelpratik comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT singhjaspreet comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps AT tomamilan comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps |