Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps

(1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, Adriel, Jose, Rejath, Ahmad, Jawad, Joshi, Jai, Jacob, Thomas, Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman, Ali, Hassam, Patel, Pratik, Singh, Jaspreet, Toma, Milan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100215
_version_ 1785127542286450688
author Abraham, Adriel
Jose, Rejath
Ahmad, Jawad
Joshi, Jai
Jacob, Thomas
Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman
Ali, Hassam
Patel, Pratik
Singh, Jaspreet
Toma, Milan
author_facet Abraham, Adriel
Jose, Rejath
Ahmad, Jawad
Joshi, Jai
Jacob, Thomas
Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman
Ali, Hassam
Patel, Pratik
Singh, Jaspreet
Toma, Milan
author_sort Abraham, Adriel
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the performance of three machine learning image classification models’ performance in detecting and classifying colon polyps. (2) Methods: The performance of three machine learning image classification models, Google Teachable Machine (GTM), Roboflow3 (RF3), and You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8n), in the detection and classification of colon polyps was evaluated using the testing split for each model. The external validity of the test was analyzed using 90 images that were not used to test, train, or validate the model. The study used a dataset of colonoscopy images of normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps. The study assessed the models’ ability to correctly classify the images into their respective classes using precision, recall, and F1 score generated from confusion matrix analysis and performance graphs. (3) Results: All three models successfully distinguished between normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps in colonoscopy images. GTM achieved the highest accuracies: 0.99, with consistent precision, recall, and F1 scores of 1.00 for the ‘normal’ class, 0.97–1.00 for ‘polyps’, and 0.97–1.00 for ‘resected polyps’. While GTM exclusively classified images into these three categories, both YOLOv8n and RF3 were able to detect and specify the location of normal colonic tissue, polyps, and resected polyps, with YOLOv8n and RF3 achieving overall accuracies of 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Machine learning, particularly models like GTM, shows promising results in ensuring comprehensive detection of polyps during colonoscopies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106074412023-10-28 Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps Abraham, Adriel Jose, Rejath Ahmad, Jawad Joshi, Jai Jacob, Thomas Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman Ali, Hassam Patel, Pratik Singh, Jaspreet Toma, Milan J Imaging Article (1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the performance of three machine learning image classification models’ performance in detecting and classifying colon polyps. (2) Methods: The performance of three machine learning image classification models, Google Teachable Machine (GTM), Roboflow3 (RF3), and You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8n), in the detection and classification of colon polyps was evaluated using the testing split for each model. The external validity of the test was analyzed using 90 images that were not used to test, train, or validate the model. The study used a dataset of colonoscopy images of normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps. The study assessed the models’ ability to correctly classify the images into their respective classes using precision, recall, and F1 score generated from confusion matrix analysis and performance graphs. (3) Results: All three models successfully distinguished between normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps in colonoscopy images. GTM achieved the highest accuracies: 0.99, with consistent precision, recall, and F1 scores of 1.00 for the ‘normal’ class, 0.97–1.00 for ‘polyps’, and 0.97–1.00 for ‘resected polyps’. While GTM exclusively classified images into these three categories, both YOLOv8n and RF3 were able to detect and specify the location of normal colonic tissue, polyps, and resected polyps, with YOLOv8n and RF3 achieving overall accuracies of 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Machine learning, particularly models like GTM, shows promising results in ensuring comprehensive detection of polyps during colonoscopies. MDPI 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10607441/ /pubmed/37888322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100215 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abraham, Adriel
Jose, Rejath
Ahmad, Jawad
Joshi, Jai
Jacob, Thomas
Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman
Ali, Hassam
Patel, Pratik
Singh, Jaspreet
Toma, Milan
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
title Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
title_full Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
title_short Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
title_sort comparative analysis of machine learning models for image detection of colonic polyps vs. resected polyps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100215
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamadriel comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT joserejath comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT ahmadjawad comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT joshijai comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT jacobthomas comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT khalidazizurrahman comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT alihassam comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT patelpratik comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT singhjaspreet comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps
AT tomamilan comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningmodelsforimagedetectionofcolonicpolypsvsresectedpolyps