Cargando…
Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Clinical benefit can be time-dependent even after first-pass recanalization (FPR) in endovascular treatment of acute stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the association between favorable outcome and FPR under a specific time frame. Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206596 |
_version_ | 1785127557148966912 |
---|---|
author | Baek, Jang-Hyun Heo, Ji Hoe Nam, Hyo Suk Kim, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Young Dae |
author_facet | Baek, Jang-Hyun Heo, Ji Hoe Nam, Hyo Suk Kim, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Young Dae |
author_sort | Baek, Jang-Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical benefit can be time-dependent even after first-pass recanalization (FPR) in endovascular treatment of acute stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the association between favorable outcome and FPR under a specific time frame. Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Recanalization status was categorized into four groups based on FPR and dichotomized time from groin puncture to recanalization (P-to-R time). Favorable outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 458 patients were included. As the cutoff of P-to-R time for favorable outcome was 30 min, recanalization status was categorized into FPR (+) with a P-to-R time ≤ 30 min (Group 1), FPR (–) with a P-to-R time ≤ 30 min (Group 2), FPR (+) with a P-to-R time > 30 min (Group 3), and FPR (–) with a P-to-R time > 30 min (Group 4). Favorable outcomes in Group 3 (37.5%) were significantly less frequent than those in Group 1 (60.4%, p = 0.029) and Group 2 (59.5%, p = 0.033) but were not significantly different from those in Group 4 (35.7%, p = 0.903). Compared to Group 1, Group 3 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30 [95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.76]; p = 0.011) and Group 4 (0.25 [0.14–0.48]; p < 0.001) were adversely associated with favorable outcomes. FPR was associated with functional outcome in a time-dependent manner. Even for patients who have achieved FPR, their functional outcome might not be favorable if the P-to-R time is >30 min. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10607503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106075032023-10-28 Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Baek, Jang-Hyun Heo, Ji Hoe Nam, Hyo Suk Kim, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Young Dae J Clin Med Article Clinical benefit can be time-dependent even after first-pass recanalization (FPR) in endovascular treatment of acute stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the association between favorable outcome and FPR under a specific time frame. Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Recanalization status was categorized into four groups based on FPR and dichotomized time from groin puncture to recanalization (P-to-R time). Favorable outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 458 patients were included. As the cutoff of P-to-R time for favorable outcome was 30 min, recanalization status was categorized into FPR (+) with a P-to-R time ≤ 30 min (Group 1), FPR (–) with a P-to-R time ≤ 30 min (Group 2), FPR (+) with a P-to-R time > 30 min (Group 3), and FPR (–) with a P-to-R time > 30 min (Group 4). Favorable outcomes in Group 3 (37.5%) were significantly less frequent than those in Group 1 (60.4%, p = 0.029) and Group 2 (59.5%, p = 0.033) but were not significantly different from those in Group 4 (35.7%, p = 0.903). Compared to Group 1, Group 3 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30 [95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.76]; p = 0.011) and Group 4 (0.25 [0.14–0.48]; p < 0.001) were adversely associated with favorable outcomes. FPR was associated with functional outcome in a time-dependent manner. Even for patients who have achieved FPR, their functional outcome might not be favorable if the P-to-R time is >30 min. MDPI 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10607503/ /pubmed/37892733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206596 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Baek, Jang-Hyun Heo, Ji Hoe Nam, Hyo Suk Kim, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Young Dae Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title | Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full | Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_fullStr | Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_short | Clinical Benefit of First-Pass Recanalization Is Time-Dependent in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_sort | clinical benefit of first-pass recanalization is time-dependent in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37892733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baekjanghyun clinicalbenefitoffirstpassrecanalizationistimedependentinendovasculartreatmentofacuteischemicstroke AT heojihoe clinicalbenefitoffirstpassrecanalizationistimedependentinendovasculartreatmentofacuteischemicstroke AT namhyosuk clinicalbenefitoffirstpassrecanalizationistimedependentinendovasculartreatmentofacuteischemicstroke AT kimbyungmoon clinicalbenefitoffirstpassrecanalizationistimedependentinendovasculartreatmentofacuteischemicstroke AT kimdongjoon clinicalbenefitoffirstpassrecanalizationistimedependentinendovasculartreatmentofacuteischemicstroke AT kimyoungdae clinicalbenefitoffirstpassrecanalizationistimedependentinendovasculartreatmentofacuteischemicstroke |