Cargando…

AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) has shown impressive success in image synthesis. Artificial GAN-based synthesized images have been widely spread over the Internet with the advancement in generating naturalistic and photo-realist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baraheem, Samah S., Nguyen, Tam V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100199
_version_ 1785127633695014912
author Baraheem, Samah S.
Nguyen, Tam V.
author_facet Baraheem, Samah S.
Nguyen, Tam V.
author_sort Baraheem, Samah S.
collection PubMed
description The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) has shown impressive success in image synthesis. Artificial GAN-based synthesized images have been widely spread over the Internet with the advancement in generating naturalistic and photo-realistic images. This might have the ability to improve content and media; however, it also constitutes a threat with regard to legitimacy, authenticity, and security. Moreover, implementing an automated system that is able to detect and recognize GAN-generated images is significant for image synthesis models as an evaluation tool, regardless of the input modality. To this end, we propose a framework for reliably detecting AI-generated images from real ones through Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). First, GAN-generated images were collected based on different tasks and different architectures to help with the generalization. Then, transfer learning was applied. Finally, several Class Activation Maps (CAM) were integrated to determine the discriminative regions that guided the classification model in its decision. Our approach achieved 100% on our dataset, i.e., Real or Synthetic Images (RSI), and a superior performance on other datasets and configurations in terms of its accuracy. Hence, it can be used as an evaluation tool in image generation. Our best detector was a pre-trained EfficientNetB4 fine-tuned on our dataset with a batch size of 64 and an initial learning rate of 0.001 for 20 epochs. Adam was used as an optimizer, and learning rate reduction along with data augmentation were incorporated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106078232023-10-28 AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images? Baraheem, Samah S. Nguyen, Tam V. J Imaging Article The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) has shown impressive success in image synthesis. Artificial GAN-based synthesized images have been widely spread over the Internet with the advancement in generating naturalistic and photo-realistic images. This might have the ability to improve content and media; however, it also constitutes a threat with regard to legitimacy, authenticity, and security. Moreover, implementing an automated system that is able to detect and recognize GAN-generated images is significant for image synthesis models as an evaluation tool, regardless of the input modality. To this end, we propose a framework for reliably detecting AI-generated images from real ones through Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). First, GAN-generated images were collected based on different tasks and different architectures to help with the generalization. Then, transfer learning was applied. Finally, several Class Activation Maps (CAM) were integrated to determine the discriminative regions that guided the classification model in its decision. Our approach achieved 100% on our dataset, i.e., Real or Synthetic Images (RSI), and a superior performance on other datasets and configurations in terms of its accuracy. Hence, it can be used as an evaluation tool in image generation. Our best detector was a pre-trained EfficientNetB4 fine-tuned on our dataset with a batch size of 64 and an initial learning rate of 0.001 for 20 epochs. Adam was used as an optimizer, and learning rate reduction along with data augmentation were incorporated. MDPI 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10607823/ /pubmed/37888306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100199 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baraheem, Samah S.
Nguyen, Tam V.
AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?
title AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?
title_full AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?
title_fullStr AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?
title_full_unstemmed AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?
title_short AI vs. AI: Can AI Detect AI-Generated Images?
title_sort ai vs. ai: can ai detect ai-generated images?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging9100199
work_keys_str_mv AT baraheemsamahs aivsaicanaidetectaigeneratedimages
AT nguyentamv aivsaicanaidetectaigeneratedimages