Cargando…
Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables
Background and Objectives: mechanical restraint (MR) is a controversial issue in emergency psychiatry and should be better studied to implement other alternative therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of MR in an Italian psychiatric unit and identify the soci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101847 |
_version_ | 1785127666493423616 |
---|---|
author | Aguglia, Andrea Corsini, Giovanni Pietro Berardelli, Isabella Berti, Andrea Conio, Benedetta Garbarino, Nicolò Gnecco, Giovanni Battista Magni, Caterina Venturini, Enrico Costanza, Alessandra Amerio, Andrea Amore, Mario Serafini, Gianluca |
author_facet | Aguglia, Andrea Corsini, Giovanni Pietro Berardelli, Isabella Berti, Andrea Conio, Benedetta Garbarino, Nicolò Gnecco, Giovanni Battista Magni, Caterina Venturini, Enrico Costanza, Alessandra Amerio, Andrea Amore, Mario Serafini, Gianluca |
author_sort | Aguglia, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: mechanical restraint (MR) is a controversial issue in emergency psychiatry and should be better studied to implement other alternative therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of MR in an Italian psychiatric unit and identify the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as the pharmacological pattern associated with MR. Materials and Methods: all subjects (N = 799) consecutively admitted to an Italian psychiatric inpatient unit were recruited. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Results: The prevalence of MR was 14.1%. Males, a younger age, and a single and migrant status were associated with the MR phenomenon. MR was more prevalent in patients affected by other diagnoses and comorbid illicit substance use, in patients with aggressive behaviors, and those that were involuntary admitted, leading significantly to hospitalization over 21 days. Furthermore, the patients that underwent MR were taking a lower number of psychiatric medications. Conclusions: Unfortunately, MR is still used in emergency psychiatry. Future research should focus on the dynamics of MR development in psychiatry, specifically considering ward- and staff-related factors that could help identify a more precise prevention and alternative intervention strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10607962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106079622023-10-28 Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables Aguglia, Andrea Corsini, Giovanni Pietro Berardelli, Isabella Berti, Andrea Conio, Benedetta Garbarino, Nicolò Gnecco, Giovanni Battista Magni, Caterina Venturini, Enrico Costanza, Alessandra Amerio, Andrea Amore, Mario Serafini, Gianluca Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: mechanical restraint (MR) is a controversial issue in emergency psychiatry and should be better studied to implement other alternative therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of MR in an Italian psychiatric unit and identify the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as the pharmacological pattern associated with MR. Materials and Methods: all subjects (N = 799) consecutively admitted to an Italian psychiatric inpatient unit were recruited. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Results: The prevalence of MR was 14.1%. Males, a younger age, and a single and migrant status were associated with the MR phenomenon. MR was more prevalent in patients affected by other diagnoses and comorbid illicit substance use, in patients with aggressive behaviors, and those that were involuntary admitted, leading significantly to hospitalization over 21 days. Furthermore, the patients that underwent MR were taking a lower number of psychiatric medications. Conclusions: Unfortunately, MR is still used in emergency psychiatry. Future research should focus on the dynamics of MR development in psychiatry, specifically considering ward- and staff-related factors that could help identify a more precise prevention and alternative intervention strategies. MDPI 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10607962/ /pubmed/37893565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101847 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Aguglia, Andrea Corsini, Giovanni Pietro Berardelli, Isabella Berti, Andrea Conio, Benedetta Garbarino, Nicolò Gnecco, Giovanni Battista Magni, Caterina Venturini, Enrico Costanza, Alessandra Amerio, Andrea Amore, Mario Serafini, Gianluca Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables |
title | Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables |
title_full | Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables |
title_short | Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables |
title_sort | mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric unit: prevalence and associated clinical variables |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893565 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agugliaandrea mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT corsinigiovannipietro mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT berardelliisabella mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT bertiandrea mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT coniobenedetta mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT garbarinonicolo mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT gneccogiovannibattista mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT magnicaterina mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT venturinienrico mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT costanzaalessandra mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT amerioandrea mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT amoremario mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables AT serafinigianluca mechanicalrestraintininpatientpsychiatricunitprevalenceandassociatedclinicalvariables |