Cargando…

Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test

Emotion understanding (EU) ability is associated with healthy social functioning and psychological well-being. Across three studies, we develop and present validity evidence for the Core Relational Themes of Emotions (CORE) Test. The test measures people’s ability to identify relational themes under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Floman, James L., Brackett, Marc A., LaPalme, Matthew L., Ponnock, Annette R., Barsade, Sigal G., Doyle, Aidan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888427
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100195
_version_ 1785127675167244288
author Floman, James L.
Brackett, Marc A.
LaPalme, Matthew L.
Ponnock, Annette R.
Barsade, Sigal G.
Doyle, Aidan
author_facet Floman, James L.
Brackett, Marc A.
LaPalme, Matthew L.
Ponnock, Annette R.
Barsade, Sigal G.
Doyle, Aidan
author_sort Floman, James L.
collection PubMed
description Emotion understanding (EU) ability is associated with healthy social functioning and psychological well-being. Across three studies, we develop and present validity evidence for the Core Relational Themes of Emotions (CORE) Test. The test measures people’s ability to identify relational themes underlying 19 positive and negative emotions. Relational themes are consistencies in the meaning people assign to emotional experiences. In Study 1, we developed and refined the test items employing a literature review, expert panel, and confusion matrix with a demographically diverse sample. Correctness criteria were determined using theory and prior research, and a progressive (degrees of correctness) paradigm was utilized to score the test. In Study 2, the CORE demonstrated high internal consistency and a confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional factor structure. The CORE showed evidence of convergence with established EU ability measures and divergent relationships with verbal intelligence and demographic characteristics, supporting its construct validity. Also, the CORE was associated with less relational conflict. In Study 3, the CORE was associated with more adaptive and less maladaptive coping and higher well-being on multiple indicators. A set of effects remained, accounting for variance from a widely used EU test, supporting the CORE’s incremental validity. Theoretical and methodological contributions are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10607998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106079982023-10-28 Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test Floman, James L. Brackett, Marc A. LaPalme, Matthew L. Ponnock, Annette R. Barsade, Sigal G. Doyle, Aidan J Intell Article Emotion understanding (EU) ability is associated with healthy social functioning and psychological well-being. Across three studies, we develop and present validity evidence for the Core Relational Themes of Emotions (CORE) Test. The test measures people’s ability to identify relational themes underlying 19 positive and negative emotions. Relational themes are consistencies in the meaning people assign to emotional experiences. In Study 1, we developed and refined the test items employing a literature review, expert panel, and confusion matrix with a demographically diverse sample. Correctness criteria were determined using theory and prior research, and a progressive (degrees of correctness) paradigm was utilized to score the test. In Study 2, the CORE demonstrated high internal consistency and a confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional factor structure. The CORE showed evidence of convergence with established EU ability measures and divergent relationships with verbal intelligence and demographic characteristics, supporting its construct validity. Also, the CORE was associated with less relational conflict. In Study 3, the CORE was associated with more adaptive and less maladaptive coping and higher well-being on multiple indicators. A set of effects remained, accounting for variance from a widely used EU test, supporting the CORE’s incremental validity. Theoretical and methodological contributions are discussed. MDPI 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10607998/ /pubmed/37888427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100195 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Floman, James L.
Brackett, Marc A.
LaPalme, Matthew L.
Ponnock, Annette R.
Barsade, Sigal G.
Doyle, Aidan
Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
title Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
title_full Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
title_fullStr Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
title_short Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
title_sort development and validation of an ability measure of emotion understanding: the core relational themes of emotion (core) test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888427
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100195
work_keys_str_mv AT flomanjamesl developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest
AT brackettmarca developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest
AT lapalmematthewl developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest
AT ponnockannetter developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest
AT barsadesigalg developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest
AT doyleaidan developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest