Cargando…
Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test
Emotion understanding (EU) ability is associated with healthy social functioning and psychological well-being. Across three studies, we develop and present validity evidence for the Core Relational Themes of Emotions (CORE) Test. The test measures people’s ability to identify relational themes under...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100195 |
_version_ | 1785127675167244288 |
---|---|
author | Floman, James L. Brackett, Marc A. LaPalme, Matthew L. Ponnock, Annette R. Barsade, Sigal G. Doyle, Aidan |
author_facet | Floman, James L. Brackett, Marc A. LaPalme, Matthew L. Ponnock, Annette R. Barsade, Sigal G. Doyle, Aidan |
author_sort | Floman, James L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotion understanding (EU) ability is associated with healthy social functioning and psychological well-being. Across three studies, we develop and present validity evidence for the Core Relational Themes of Emotions (CORE) Test. The test measures people’s ability to identify relational themes underlying 19 positive and negative emotions. Relational themes are consistencies in the meaning people assign to emotional experiences. In Study 1, we developed and refined the test items employing a literature review, expert panel, and confusion matrix with a demographically diverse sample. Correctness criteria were determined using theory and prior research, and a progressive (degrees of correctness) paradigm was utilized to score the test. In Study 2, the CORE demonstrated high internal consistency and a confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional factor structure. The CORE showed evidence of convergence with established EU ability measures and divergent relationships with verbal intelligence and demographic characteristics, supporting its construct validity. Also, the CORE was associated with less relational conflict. In Study 3, the CORE was associated with more adaptive and less maladaptive coping and higher well-being on multiple indicators. A set of effects remained, accounting for variance from a widely used EU test, supporting the CORE’s incremental validity. Theoretical and methodological contributions are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10607998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106079982023-10-28 Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test Floman, James L. Brackett, Marc A. LaPalme, Matthew L. Ponnock, Annette R. Barsade, Sigal G. Doyle, Aidan J Intell Article Emotion understanding (EU) ability is associated with healthy social functioning and psychological well-being. Across three studies, we develop and present validity evidence for the Core Relational Themes of Emotions (CORE) Test. The test measures people’s ability to identify relational themes underlying 19 positive and negative emotions. Relational themes are consistencies in the meaning people assign to emotional experiences. In Study 1, we developed and refined the test items employing a literature review, expert panel, and confusion matrix with a demographically diverse sample. Correctness criteria were determined using theory and prior research, and a progressive (degrees of correctness) paradigm was utilized to score the test. In Study 2, the CORE demonstrated high internal consistency and a confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional factor structure. The CORE showed evidence of convergence with established EU ability measures and divergent relationships with verbal intelligence and demographic characteristics, supporting its construct validity. Also, the CORE was associated with less relational conflict. In Study 3, the CORE was associated with more adaptive and less maladaptive coping and higher well-being on multiple indicators. A set of effects remained, accounting for variance from a widely used EU test, supporting the CORE’s incremental validity. Theoretical and methodological contributions are discussed. MDPI 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10607998/ /pubmed/37888427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100195 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Floman, James L. Brackett, Marc A. LaPalme, Matthew L. Ponnock, Annette R. Barsade, Sigal G. Doyle, Aidan Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test |
title | Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test |
title_full | Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test |
title_short | Development and Validation of an Ability Measure of Emotion Understanding: The Core Relational Themes of Emotion (CORE) Test |
title_sort | development and validation of an ability measure of emotion understanding: the core relational themes of emotion (core) test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10607998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37888427 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11100195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flomanjamesl developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest AT brackettmarca developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest AT lapalmematthewl developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest AT ponnockannetter developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest AT barsadesigalg developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest AT doyleaidan developmentandvalidationofanabilitymeasureofemotionunderstandingthecorerelationalthemesofemotioncoretest |