Cargando…

Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients

Background and Objectives: Implantation of a short femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) could reduce the perioperative time, soft tissue damage, and preserve the bone stock of the proximal femur. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mauch, Marlene, Brecht, Hendrik, Clauss, Martin, Stoffel, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101822
_version_ 1785127703243915264
author Mauch, Marlene
Brecht, Hendrik
Clauss, Martin
Stoffel, Karl
author_facet Mauch, Marlene
Brecht, Hendrik
Clauss, Martin
Stoffel, Karl
author_sort Mauch, Marlene
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Implantation of a short femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) could reduce the perioperative time, soft tissue damage, and preserve the bone stock of the proximal femur. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes after the use of short stems in rTHA with a follow-up of 1 to 5 years. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single center, and observational study analyzed the data of 31 patients (12 female, 19 male) with a median (interquartile range) age of 68.2 years (61.2–78.4) and BMI of 26.7 kg/m(2) (24.6–29.4) who received an uncemented short femoral stem in rTHA between 2015 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were extracted from medical reports and assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain and satisfaction, and the UCLA Physical Activity Score. Radiographs were analyzed for stem subsidence, fixation, and bone parameters. The Wilcoxon test was used for pre–post rTHA differences (p < 0.05); clinical relevance was interpreted based on effect sizes according to Cohen’s d. Results: All the clinical outcome measures improved significantly (p ≤ 0.001) at follow-up compared to preoperative status, with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d) ranging from 2.8 to 1.7. At the last follow-up, the median (interquartile) mHHS was 80.9 (58.6–93.5). Stem fixation was stable in all cases. Complications included stem subsidence of 3 mm (n = 1) and 10 mm (n = 1), heterotopic ossification Brooker stage III (n = 2), intraoperative femur perforation (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture Vancouver type A (n = 1), and dislocation (n = 2). Conclusions: The good clinical results in our selective study population of patients with mild to moderate bone deficiency, supported by large effect sizes, together with a complication rate within the normal range, support the consideration of short stems as a surgical option after a thorough preoperative analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10608113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106081132023-10-28 Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients Mauch, Marlene Brecht, Hendrik Clauss, Martin Stoffel, Karl Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Implantation of a short femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) could reduce the perioperative time, soft tissue damage, and preserve the bone stock of the proximal femur. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes after the use of short stems in rTHA with a follow-up of 1 to 5 years. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single center, and observational study analyzed the data of 31 patients (12 female, 19 male) with a median (interquartile range) age of 68.2 years (61.2–78.4) and BMI of 26.7 kg/m(2) (24.6–29.4) who received an uncemented short femoral stem in rTHA between 2015 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were extracted from medical reports and assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain and satisfaction, and the UCLA Physical Activity Score. Radiographs were analyzed for stem subsidence, fixation, and bone parameters. The Wilcoxon test was used for pre–post rTHA differences (p < 0.05); clinical relevance was interpreted based on effect sizes according to Cohen’s d. Results: All the clinical outcome measures improved significantly (p ≤ 0.001) at follow-up compared to preoperative status, with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d) ranging from 2.8 to 1.7. At the last follow-up, the median (interquartile) mHHS was 80.9 (58.6–93.5). Stem fixation was stable in all cases. Complications included stem subsidence of 3 mm (n = 1) and 10 mm (n = 1), heterotopic ossification Brooker stage III (n = 2), intraoperative femur perforation (n = 1), periprosthetic fracture Vancouver type A (n = 1), and dislocation (n = 2). Conclusions: The good clinical results in our selective study population of patients with mild to moderate bone deficiency, supported by large effect sizes, together with a complication rate within the normal range, support the consideration of short stems as a surgical option after a thorough preoperative analysis. MDPI 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10608113/ /pubmed/37893539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101822 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mauch, Marlene
Brecht, Hendrik
Clauss, Martin
Stoffel, Karl
Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients
title Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients
title_full Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients
title_fullStr Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients
title_short Use of Short Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of 31 Patients
title_sort use of short stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study of 31 patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10608113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37893539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101822
work_keys_str_mv AT mauchmarlene useofshortstemsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof31patients
AT brechthendrik useofshortstemsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof31patients
AT claussmartin useofshortstemsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof31patients
AT stoffelkarl useofshortstemsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectiveobservationalstudyof31patients